There sig_atomic_t is shorter than void *.
As result, it cannot keep pointer.
Assigning to void * is actually safe for us in a signal handler.
Reviewed by: asomers
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
Fixes: 4f917847c9
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D32064
During VOP_GETPAGES, fusefs needs to determine the file's length, which
could require a FUSE_GETATTR operation. If that fails, it's better to
SIGBUS than panic.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Axcient
Reviewed by: markj, kib
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31994
Follow-up d396c67f26 by also silencing warnings about deprecated
implicit copy constructors in the fusefs tests, which use googletest.
Fixes: d396c67f26
MFC after: 3 days
During FUSE_SETLK, the owner field should uniquely identify the calling
process. The fusefs module now sets it to the process's pid.
Previously, it expected the calling process to set it directly, which
was wrong.
libfuse also apparently expects the owner field to be set during
FUSE_GETLK, though I'm not sure why.
PR: 256005
Reported by: Agata <chogata@moosefs.pro>
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30622
Every FUSE operation has a unique value in its header. As the name
implies, these values are supposed to be unique among all outstanding
operations. And since FUSE_INTERRUPT is asynchronous and racy, it is
desirable that the unique values be unique among all operations that are
"close in time".
Ensure that they are actually unique by incrementing them whenever we
reuse a fuse_dispatcher object, for example during fsync, write, and
listextattr.
PR: 244686
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30810
/dev/fuse is always ready for writing, so it's kind of dumb to poll it.
But some applications do it anyway. Better to return ready than EINVAL.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: emaste, pfg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30784
1) F_SETLKW (blocking) operations would be sent to the FUSE server as
F_SETLK (non-blocking).
2) Release operations, F_SETLK with lk_type = F_UNLCK, would simply
return EINVAL.
PR: 253500
Reported by: John Millikin <jmillikin@gmail.com>
MFC after: 2 weeks
This allows d_off to be used with lseek to position the file so that
getdirentries(2) will return the next entry. It is not used by
readdir(3).
PR: 253411
Reported by: John Millikin <jmillikin@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D28605
This updates the FUSE protocol to 7.28, though most of the new features
are optional and are not yet implemented.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27818
An order-of-operations problem caused an expectation intended for
FUSE_READ to instead match FUSE_ACCESS. Surprisingly, only one test
case was affected.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Reviewed by: cem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27818
FUSE_LSEEK reports holes on fuse file systems, and is used for example
by bsdtar.
MFC after: 2 weeks
Relnotes: yes
Reviewed by: cem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27804
maxphys is now a tunable, ever since r368124. The default value is also
larger than it used to be. That broke several fusefs tests that made
assumptions about maxphys.
* WriteCluster.clustering used the MAXPHYS compile-time constant.
* WriteBackAsync.direct_io_partially_overlaps_cached_block implicitly
depended on the default value of maxphys. Fix it by making the
dependency explicit.
* Write.write_large implicitly assumed that maxphys would be no more
than twice maxbcachebuf. Fix it by explicitly setting m_max_write.
* WriteCluster.clustering and several others failed because the MockFS
module did not work for max_write > 128KB (which most tests would set
when maxphys > 256KB). Limit max_write accordingly. This is the same
as fusefs-libs's behavior.
* Bmap's tests were originally written for MAXPHYS=128KB. With larger
values, the simulated file size was too small.
PR: 252096
Reviewed by: emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27769
Repeating the default WARNS here makes it slightly more difficult to
experiment with default WARNS changes, e.g. if we did something absolutely
bananas and introduced a WARNS=7 and wanted to try lifting the default to
that.
Drop most of them; there is one in the blake2 kernel module, but I suspect
it should be dropped -- the default WARNS in the rest of the build doesn't
currently apply to kernel modules, and I haven't put too much thought into
whether it makes sense to make it so.
If a FUSE server returns FOPEN_DIRECT_IO in response to FUSE_OPEN, that
instructs the kernel to bypass the page cache for that file. This feature
is also known by libfuse's name: "direct_io".
However, when accessing a file via mmap, there is no possible way to bypass
the cache completely. This change fixes a deadlock that would happen when
an mmap'd write tried to invalidate a portion of the cache, wrongly assuming
that a write couldn't possibly come from cache if direct_io were set.
Arguably, we could instead disable mmap for files with FOPEN_DIRECT_IO set.
But allowing it is less likely to cause user complaints, and is more in
keeping with the spirit of open(2), where O_DIRECT instructs the kernel to
"reduce", not "eliminate" cache effects.
PR: 247276
Reported by: trapexit@spawn.link
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 3 days
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26485
Thanks to r364064, the name cache now returns a hit where previously it
would miss. Adjust the expectations accordingly.
PR: 248583
Reported by: lwhsu
MFC with: r364064
This patch fixes two issues relating to FUSE_ACCESS when the
default_permissions mount option is disabled:
* VOP_ACCESS() calls with VADMIN set should never be sent to a fuse server
in the form of FUSE_ACCESS operations. The FUSE protocol has no equivalent
of VADMIN, so we must evaluate such things kernel-side, regardless of the
default_permissions setting.
* The FUSE protocol only requires FUSE_ACCESS to be sent for two purposes:
for the access(2) syscall and to check directory permissions for
searchability during lookup. FreeBSD sends it much more frequently, due to
differences between our VFS and Linux's, for which FUSE was designed. But
this patch does eliminate several cases not required by the FUSE protocol:
* for any FUSE_*XATTR operation
* when creating a new file
* when deleting a file
* when setting timestamps, such as by utimensat(2).
* Additionally, when default_permissions is disabled, this patch removes one
FUSE_GETATTR operation when deleting a file.
PR: 245689
Reported by: MooseFS FreeBSD Team <freebsd@moosefs.pro>
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24777
When a FUSE operation other than LOOKUP returns ENOENT, the kernel will
reclaim that vnode, resuling in a FUSE_FORGET being sent a short while
later. Many of the ENOENT tests weren't expecting those FUSE_FORGET
operations. They usually passed by luck since FUSE_FORGET is often delayed.
This commit adds appropriate expectations.
MFC after: 2 weeks
These two errors have been present since the tests' introduction.
Coincidentally every test (I think there's only one) that cares about that
field also works when the field's value is 0.
MFC after: 2 weeks
mac_bsdextended(4), when enabled, causes ordinary operations to send many
more VOP_GETATTRs to file system. The fusefs tests expectations aren't
written with those in mind. Optionally expecting them would greatly
obfuscate the fusefs tests. Worse, certain fusefs functionality (like
attribute caching) would be impossible to test if the tests couldn't expect
an exact number of GETATTR operations.
This commit resolves that conflict by making two changes:
1. The fusefs tests will now check for mac_bsdextended, and skip if it's
enabled.
2. The mac_bsdextended tests will now check whether the module is enabled, not
merely loaded. If it's loaded but disabled, the tests will automatically
enable it for the duration of the tests.
With these changes, a CI system can achieve best coverage by loading both
fusefs and mac_bsdextended at boot, and setting
security.mac.bsdextended.enabled=0
PR: 244229
Reported by: lwhsu
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24577
The FUSE protocol allows the client (kernel) to cache a file's size, if the
server (userspace daemon) allows it. A well-behaved daemon obviously should
not change a file's size while a client has it cached. But a buggy daemon
might. If the kernel ever detects that that has happened, then it should
invalidate the entire cache for that file. Previously, we would not only
cache stale data, but in the case of a file extension while we had the size
cached, we accidentally extended the cache with zeros.
PR: 244178
Reported by: Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmx.com>
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24012
We were reusing a structure for multiple operations, but failing to
reinitialize one member. The result is that a server that cares about FUSE
file handle IDs would see one correct FUSE_FSYNC operation, and one with the
FHID unset.
PR: 244431
Reported by: Agata <chogata@gmail.com>
MFC after: 2 weeks
This re-enables building the googletest suite by default on mips and instead
specifically doesn't build fusefs tests for mips+clang builds. clang will
easily spent >= 1.5 hours compiling a single file due to a bug in
optimization (see LLVM PR 43263), so turn these off for now while that's
hashed out.
GCC builds are unaffected and build the fusefs tests as-is. Clang builds
only happen by early adopters attempting to hash out the remaining issues.
The comment has been updated to reflect its new position and use less strong
wording about imposing on people.
Discussed with: ngie, asomers
Reviewed by: ngie
Coverity complained that I wasn't initializing some class members until the
SetUp method. Do it in the constructor instead.
Reported by: Coverity
Coverity CIDs: 1404352, 1404378
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Where open(2) is expected to fail, the tests should assert or expect that
its return value is -1. These tests all accepted too much but happened to
pass anyway.
Reported by: Coverity
Coverity CID: 1404512, 1404378, 1404504, 1404483
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
When communicating with a FUSE server that implements version 7.8 (or older)
of the FUSE protocol, the FUSE_WRITE request structure is 16 bytes shorter
than normal. The protocol version check wasn't applied universally, leading
to an extra 16 bytes being sent to such servers. The extra bytes were
allocated and bzero()d, so there was no information disclosure.
Reviewed by: emaste
MFC after: 3 days
MFC-With: r350665
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21557
The fusefs tests deliberately leak file descriptors. To do otherwise would
add extra complications to the tests' mock FUSE server. This annotation
should hopefully convince Coverity to shut up about the leaks.
Reviewed by: uqs
MFC after: 4 days
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Address the following defects reported by Coverity:
* Structurally dead code (CID 1404366): set m_quit before FAIL, not after
* Unchecked return value of sysctlbyname (CID 1404321)
* Unchecked return value of stat(2) (CID 1404471)
* Unchecked return value of open(2) (CID 1404402, 1404529)
* Unchecked return value of dup(2) (CID 1404478)
* Buffer overflows. These are all false positives caused by the fact that
Coverity thinks I'm using a buffer to store strings, when in fact I'm
really just using it to store a byte array that happens to be initialized
with a string. I'm changing the type from char to uint8_t in the hopes
that it will placate Coverity. (CID 1404338, 1404350, 1404367, 1404376,
1404379, 1404381, 1404388, 1404403, 1404425, 1404433, 1404434, 1404474,
1404480, 1404484, 1404503, 1404505)
* False positive file descriptor leak. I'm going to try to fix this with
Coverity modeling, but I'll also change an EXPECT to ASSERT so we don't
perform meaningless assertions after the failure. (CID 1404320, 1404324,
1404440, 1404445).
* Unannotated file descriptor leak. This will be followed up by a Coverity
modeling change. (CID 1404326, 1404334, 1404336, 1404357, 1404361,
1404372, 1404391, 1404395, 1404409, 1404430, 1404448, 1404451, 1404455,
1404457, 1404458, 1404460)
* Uninitialized variables in C++ constructors (CID 1404327, 1404346). In the
case of m_maxphys, this actually led to part of the FUSE_INIT's response
being set to stack garbage during the WriteCluster::clustering test.
* Uninitialized sun_len field in struct sockaddr_un (CID 1404330, 1404371,
1404429).
Reported by: Coverity
Reviewed by: emaste
MFC after: 3 days
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21457
* A small error in r338152 let to the returned size always being exactly
eight bytes too large.
* The FUSE_LISTXATTR operation works like Linux's listxattr(2): if the
caller does not provide enough space, then the server should return ERANGE
rather than return a truncated list. That's true even though in FUSE's
case the kernel doesn't provide space to the client at all; it simply
requests a maximum size for the list. We previously weren't handling the
case where the server returns ERANGE even though the kernel requested as
much size as the server had told us it needs; that can happen due to a
race.
* We also need to ensure that a pathological server that always returns
ERANGE no matter what size we request in FUSE_LISTXATTR won't cause an
infinite loop in the kernel. As of this commit, it will instead cause an
infinite loop that exits and enters the kernel on each iteration, allowing
signals to be processed.
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21287
Attempting to build the fusefs tests WITHOUT_GOOGLETEST will result in an
error if the host system or sysroot doesn't already have googletest headers
in /usr/include/private (e.g. host built/installed WITHOUT_GOOGLETEST, clean
cross-buildworld WITHOUT_GOOGLETEST).
Reviewed by: asomers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21367
The FUSE_LISTXATTR operation always returns the full list of a file's
extended attributes, in all namespaces. There's no way to filter the list
server-side. However, currently FreeBSD's fusefs driver sends a namespace
string with the FUSE_LISTXATTR request. That behavior was probably copied
from fuse_vnop_getextattr, which has an attribute name argument. It's
been there ever since extended attribute support was added in r324620. This
commit removes it.
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21280
The entirety of r351061 was a copy/paste error. I'm sorry I've been
comitting so hastily.
Reported by: rpokala
Reviewed by: rpokala
MFC after: 2 weeks
MFC-With: 351061
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21265
In FUSE protocol 7.9, the size of the FUSE_GETATTR request has increased.
However, the fusefs driver is currently not sending the additional fields.
In our implementation, the additional fields are always zero, so I there
haven't been any test failures until now. But fusefs-lkl requires the
request's length to be correct.
Fix this bug, and also enhance the test suite to catch similar bugs.
PR: 239830
MFC after: 2 weeks
MFC-With: 350665
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
The test needs to expect a FUSE_FORGET operation. Most of the time the test
would pass anyway, because by chance FUSE_FORGET would arrive after the
unmount.
MFC after: 2 weeks
MFC-With: 350665
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
This is a gcc 8.0+ warning which needed to be silenced on for the riscv
build. amd64-xtoolchain-gcc still uses gcc 6.4.0 and does not understand
this flag.
Reviewed by: asomers
Feedback from: imp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21195
When a fusefs file system is mounted using the writeback cache, the cache
may still be bypassed by opening a file with O_DIRECT. When writing with
O_DIRECT, the cache must be invalidated for the affected portion of the
file. Fix some panics caused by inadvertently invalidating too much.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
