It defaults to -5 dBm for eeproms earlier than v21.
This apparently only applies to Merlin (AR9280) or later,
earlier 11n chipsets have a power table offset of 0.
All the code in ath9k which checks the power table offset
and takes it into account first ensures the chip is
Merlin or later.
The earlier way of doing debugging would evaluate the function parameters
before calling the HALDEBUG. In the case of detailed register debugging
would mean a -lot- of unneeded register IO and other stuff was going on.
This method evaluates the ath_hal_debug variable before the function
parameters are evaluated, drastically reducing the amount of overhead
enabling HAL debugging during compilation.
determining whether to use MRR or not.
It uses the 11g protection mode when calculating 11n related stuff, rather
than checking the 11n protection mode.
Furthermore, the 11n chipsets can quite happily handle multi-rate retry w/
protection; the TX path and rate control modules need to be taught about
that.
* change the BB gating logic to explicitly define which chips are covered;
the ath9k method isn't as clear.
* don't disable the BB gating for now, the ar5416 initvals have it, and the
ar9160 initval sets it to 0x0. Figure out why before re-enabling this.
* migrate the Merlin (ar9280) applicable WAR from the Kite (ar9285) code
(which won't get called for Merlin!) and stuff it in here.
* add dot11rate_label() which returns Mb or MCS based on legacy or HT
* use it everywhere dot11rate() is used
* in the "current selection" part at the top of the debugging output,
otuput what the rate itself is rather than the rix. The rate index
(rix) has very little meaning to normal humans who don't know how
to find the PHY settings for each of the chipsets; pointing out the
rix rate and type is likely more useful.
These flags are just plain wrong - they're the node flags from negotiation,
not the configured flags. I'll jump in later on and figure out exactly
what should be done to properly set these two flags when in both STA mode
(ie, what the AP says is possible and what's configured) and AP mode
(ie, where the AP has a configuration, but then negotiates what's possible
with each node, so per-node configuration can and will differ.)
This allows the 11n 2.4ghz/ht20 mode to associate (but perform poorly still)
and exchange MCS rates with atheros reference APs and a Cisco/Linksys
E3000 AP.
* Turn ath_tx_calc_ctsduration() into a function that
returns the ctsduration, or -1 for HT rates;
* add a printf() to ath_tx_calc_ctsduration() which will be
very loud if somehow that function is called with an MCS
rate;
* Add ath_tx_get_rtscts_rate() which returns the RTS/CTS
rate to use for the given data rate, incl. the short
preamble flag;
* Only call ath_tx_calc_ctsduration() for non-11n chipsets;
11n chipsets don't require the rtscts duration to be
calculated.
It's used to calculate:
* the initial per-rate entries for short/long preamble ACK durations;
* packet durations for TDMA slot decisions;
* RTS/CTS protection durations;
* updating the duration field in the 802.11 frame header
This way invalid durations will generate a warning, prompting for it to be
fixed.
as they're likely not entirely correct, but they give people something
to toy with to compare behaviour/performance.
Disable the anti-noise part, as this apparently interferes with
RIFS. I haven't verified this.
packet duration for the ath_rate_sample module.
This doesn't affect the packet TX at all; only how much time the
sample rate module attributes to a completed TX.
correctly:
* pass in whether to allow the hardware to override the duration field
in the main data frame (durupdate_en) - PS_POLL frames in particular
don't have the duration bit overriden;
* there's no rts/cts duration here; that's done elsehwere
There's still a lot of random issues to sort out with the radio side of
things and AMPDU RX handling (and completely missing AMPDU TX handling!)
but if people wish to give this a go and assist in debugging the
issues, they can define ATH_DO_11N to enable it.
I'm just re-iterating - this is here to allow people to assist in
further 11n development; it is not any indication that the 11n support
is complete and functional.
Important notes:
* This doesn't support 1-stream cards yet - (eg AR9285) - the various bits
that negotiate TX/RX MCS don't know not to try >1 stream TX or negotiate
1-stream RX; so don't enable 11n unless you've first taught the rate
control module and the net80211 stack to negotiate 1-stream stuff;
* The only rate control module minimally 11n aware is ath_rate_sample;
* ath_rate_sample doesn't know about HT/40; so airtime will be incorrectly
calculated;
* The AR9160 and AR9280 radio code is unreliable at the higher MCS rates for
some reason; this will definitely impact 11n performance;
* AMPDU-TX isn't yet implemented;
* AMPDU-RX may be a bit buggy still and will definitely suffer from the
radio unreliability mentioned above (ie, don't expect 150/300mbit
RX just yet.)
The correct bit to set is 0x1 in the high MAC address byte, not 0x80.
The hardware isn't programmed with that bit (which is the multicast
adress bit.)
The linux ath9k keycache code uses that bit in the MAC as a "this is
a multicast key!" and doesn't set the AR_KEYTABLE_VALID bit.
This tells the hardware the MAC isn't to be used for unicast destination
matching but it can be used for multicast bssid traffic.
This fixes some encryption problems in station mode.
PR: kern/154598
Revert back to the previous method of doing it for where a node can be
identified and it's an 11n node.
I'll have to do some further research into exactly what is being messed up
with the sequence number matching and I'll then revisit this.
This doesn't yet take into account HT40 packet durations as the node info
(needed to know if it's a HT20 or HT40 node) isn't available everywhere
it needs to be.
putting descriptors (not buffers) across a 4k page boundary can cause issues.
I've not seen it in production myself but it apparently can cause problems.
So, in preparation for addressing this workaround, (re)-expose the particular
HAL capability bit which marks whether the chipset has support for cross-4k-
boundary transactions or not.
A subsequent commit will modify the descriptor allocation to avoid allocating
descriptor entries that straddle a 4k page boundary.
* The existing radio config code was for the AR5416/AR9160 and missed out
on some of the AR9280 specific stuff. Include said stuff from ath9k.
* Refactor out the gain control settings into a new function, again pilfered
from ath9k.
* Use the analog register RMW macro when touching analog registers.
Obtained from: Linux ath9k
This fixes two problems -
* All packets need to be processed here, not just aggregate ones - as any
received frames (AMPDU or otherwise) in the given TID (traffic class id)
will update the sequence number and, implied with that, update the window;
* It seems there's situations where packets aren't matching a current node but
somehow need to be tracked. Thus just tag them all for now; I'll figure out
the why later.
Whilst I'm here, bump the stats counters whilst I'm at it.
This fixes AMPDU RX in my tests; the main problems now stem from what look
like PHY level error/retransmits which are impeding general throughput, incl.
AMPDU.
TX chainmask.
since the upper layers don't (yet) know about the active TX/RX chainmasks,
it can't tell the rate scenario functions what to use. I'll eventually sort
this out; this restores functionality in the meantime.
This isn't strictly required to TX (at least non-agg and non-HT40,
non-short-GI) frames; but as it needs to be done anyway, just get
it done.
Linux ath9k uses the rate scenario style path for -all- packets,
legacy or otherwise. This code does much the same.
Beacon TX still uses the legacy, non-rate-scenario TX descriptor
setup. Ath9k also does this.
This 11n rate scenario path is only called for chips in the AR5416
HAL; legacy chips use the previous interface for TX'ing.
A-MPDU RX interferes with packet retransmission/reordering.
In local testing, I was seeing A-MPDU being negotiated and then
not used by the AP sending frames to the STA; the STA would then
treat non A-MPDU frames that are retransmits as out of the window
and get plain confused.
The hardware RX status descriptor has a "I'm part of an aggregate"
bit; so this should eventually be tested and then punted to the
A-MPDU reorder handling only if it has this bit set.
