place.
This moves the dependency on GCC's and other compiler's features into
the central sys/cdefs.h file, while the individual source files can
then refer to #ifdef __COMPILER_FEATURE_FOO where they by now used to
refer to #if __GNUC__ > 3.1415 && __BARC__ <= 42.
By now, GCC and ICC (the Intel compiler) have been actively tested on
IA32 platforms by netchild. Extension to other compilers is supposed
to be possible, of course.
Submitted by: netchild
Reviewed by: various developers on arch@, some time ago
to build the kernel. It doesn't affect the operation if gcc.
Most of the changes are just adding __INTEL_COMPILER to #ifdef's, as
icc v8 may define __GNUC__ some parts may look strange but are
necessary.
Additional changes:
- in_cksum.[ch]:
* use a generic C version instead of the assembly version in the !gcc
case (ASM code breaks with the optimizations icc does)
-> no bad checksums with an icc compiled kernel
Help from: andre, grehan, das
Stolen from: alpha version via ppc version
The entire checksum code should IMHO be replaced with the DragonFly
version (because it isn't guaranteed future revisions of gcc will
include similar optimizations) as in:
---snip---
Revision Changes Path
1.12 +1 -0 src/sys/conf/files.i386
1.4 +142 -558 src/sys/i386/i386/in_cksum.c
1.5 +33 -69 src/sys/i386/include/in_cksum.h
1.5 +2 -0 src/sys/netinet/igmp.c
1.6 +0 -1 src/sys/netinet/in.h
1.6 +2 -0 src/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c
1.4 +3 -4 src/contrib/ipfilter/ip_compat.h
1.3 +1 -2 src/sbin/natd/icmp.c
1.4 +0 -1 src/sbin/natd/natd.c
1.48 +1 -0 src/sys/conf/files
1.2 +0 -1 src/sys/conf/files.amd64
1.13 +0 -1 src/sys/conf/files.i386
1.5 +0 -1 src/sys/conf/files.pc98
1.7 +1 -1 src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/fil.c
1.10 +2 -3 src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_compat.h
1.10 +1 -1 src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_fil.c
1.7 +1 -1 src/sys/dev/netif/txp/if_txp.c
1.7 +1 -1 src/sys/net/ip_mroute/ip_mroute.c
1.7 +1 -2 src/sys/net/ipfw/ip_fw2.c
1.6 +1 -2 src/sys/netinet/igmp.c
1.4 +158 -116 src/sys/netinet/in_cksum.c
1.6 +1 -1 src/sys/netinet/ip_gre.c
1.7 +1 -2 src/sys/netinet/ip_icmp.c
1.10 +1 -1 src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c
1.10 +1 -2 src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c
1.13 +1 -2 src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
1.9 +1 -2 src/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c
1.10 +1 -1 src/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c
1.10 +1 -1 src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c
1.9 +1 -2 src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c
1.5 +1 -2 src/sys/netinet6/ipsec.c
1.5 +1 -2 src/sys/netproto/ipsec/ipsec.c
1.5 +1 -1 src/sys/netproto/ipsec/ipsec_input.c
1.4 +1 -2 src/sys/netproto/ipsec/ipsec_output.c
and finally remove
sys/i386/i386 in_cksum.c
sys/i386/include in_cksum.h
---snip---
- endian.h:
* DTRT in C++ mode
- quad.h:
* we don't use gcc v1 anymore, remove support for it
Suggested by: bde (long ago)
- assym.h:
* avoid zero-length arrays (remove dependency on a gcc specific
feature)
This change changes the contents of the object file, but as it's
only used to generate some values for a header, and the generator
knows how to handle this, there's no impact in the gcc case.
Explained by: bde
Submitted by: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
- aicasm.c:
* minor change to teach it about the way icc spells "-nostdinc"
Not approved by: gibbs (no reply to my mail)
- bump __FreeBSD_version (lang/icc needs to know about the changes)
Incarnations of this patch survive gcc compiles since a loooong time,
I use it on my desktop. An icc compiled kernel works since Nov. 2003
(exceptions: snd_* if used as modules), it survives a build of the
entire ports collection with icc.
Parts of this commit contains suggestions or submissions from
Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>.
Reviewed by: -arch
Submitted by: netchild
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!)
avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been
insane otherwise.
NOT derived from the Linux code and is thus not GPL'd. It is the author's
express wish that the GPL copyrighted version be removed and this BSD copyright
version take its place. Considering our own stance on this, I'm certainly
not going to argue! [Note to NetBSD folks: You're free to grab it now :-)]
Submitted by: Mikael Hybsch <micke@dynas.se>
