if we do acquire an advisory lock, great! We'll release it later.
However, if we fail to acquire a lock, we perform the coredump
anyway. This problem became particularly visible with NFS after
the introduction of rpc.lockd: if the lock manager isn't running,
then locking calls will fail, aborting the core dump (resulting in
a zero-byte dump file).
Reported by: Yogeshwar Shenoy <ynshenoy@alumni.cs.ucsb.edu>
psignal()/tdsignal(). The test was historically in psignal(). It was
changed into a KASSERT, and then later moved to tdsignal() when the
latter was introduced.
Reviewed by: iedowse, jhb
When a signal is being delivered to process, first find a sigwait
thread to deliver, POSIX's argument is speed of delivering signal
to sigwait thread is faster than other ways. A signal in its wait
set will cause sigwait to return the signal number, a signal not
in its wait set but in not blocked by the thread also causes sigwait
to return, but sigwait returns EINTR, sigwait is oneshot operation,
only one signal can be delivered to its wait set, when a signal is
delivered to the sigwait thread, the thread's sigwait state is canceled.
be delivered to that thread, regardless of whether it
has it masked or not.
Previously, if the targeted thread had the signal masked,
it would be put on the processes' siglist. If
another thread has the signal umasked or unmasks it before
the target, then the thread it was intended for would never
receive it.
This patch attempts to solve the problem by requiring callers
of tdsignal() to say whether the signal is for the thread or
for the process. If it is for the process, then normal processing
occurs and any thread that has it unmasked can receive it.
But if it is destined for a specific thread, it is put on
that thread's pending list regardless of whether it is currently
masked or not.
The new behaviour still needs more work, though. If the signal
is reposted for some reason it is always posted back to the
thread that handled it because the information regarding the
target of the signal has been lost by then.
Reviewed by: jdp, jeff, bde (style)
or unblock a thread in kernel, and allow UTS to specify whether syscall
should be restarted.
o Add ability for UTS to monitor signal comes in and removed from process,
the flag PS_SIGEVENT is used to indicate the events.
o Add a KMF_WAITSIGEVENT for KSE mailbox flag, UTS call kse_release with
this flag set to wait for above signal event.
o For SA based thread, kernel masks all signal in its signal mask, let
UTS to use kse_thr_interrupt interrupt a thread, and install a signal
frame in userland for the thread.
o Add a tm_syncsig in thread mailbox, when a hardware trap occurs,
it is used to deliver synchronous signal to userland, and upcall
is schedule, so UTS can process the synchronous signal for the thread.
Reviewed by: julian (mentor)
POSIX says siginfo pointer parameter can be NULL and if the
function success, it should return signal number but not zero.
The waitset it past should be negatived before it can be
used as thread signal mask.
threads in the process have already masked the signal, so job control
is delayed. But later a thread unmasking the STOP signal should enable
job control, so in issignal(), scanning all threads in process to see
if we can direct suspend some of them, not just suspend current thread.
schedules an upcall. Signal delivering to a bound thread is same as
non-threaded process. This is intended to be used by libpthread to
implement PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM thread.
2. Simplify kse_release() a bit, remove sleep loop.
curthread. Unlike td_flags, this field does not need any locking.
- Replace the td_inktr and td_inktrace variables with equivalent private
thread flags.
- Move TDF_OLDMASK over to the private flags field so it no longer requires
sched_lock.
PT_DETACH ptrace(2) requests from functioning as advertised in the
manual page. As described in kern/35175, the PT_DETACH request will,
under certain circumstances, pass an unwanted signal on to the traced
process upan detaching from it. The PT_CONTINUE request will
sometimes fail if you make it pass a signal that has "properties" that
differ from the properties of the signal that origionally caused the
traced process to be stopped. Since PT_KILL is nothing than
PT_CONTINUE with SIGKILL, it is broken too. In the PT_KILL case, this
leads to an unkillable process.
PR: 44011
Submitted by: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Approved by: re(jhb)
- Move struct sigacts out of the u-area and malloc() it using the
M_SUBPROC malloc bucket.
- Add a small sigacts_*() API for managing sigacts structures: sigacts_alloc(),
sigacts_free(), sigacts_copy(), sigacts_share(), and sigacts_shared().
- Remove the p_sigignore, p_sigacts, and p_sigcatch macros.
- Add a mutex to struct sigacts that protects all the members of the struct.
- Add sigacts locking.
- Remove Giant from nosys(), kill(), killpg(), and kern_sigaction() now
that sigacts is locked.
- Several in-kernel functions such as psignal(), tdsignal(), trapsignal(),
and thread_stopped() are now MP safe.
Reviewed by: arch@
Approved by: re (rwatson)
do all the various sigstack dances, unlock the proc lock, and finally do
the copyout. This more closely resembles the behavior of
kern_sigaltstack() and closes a small race.
- Remove Giant from osigstack as it is no longer needed.
lock assertion to it.
- SIGPENDING() no longer needs sched_lock, so only grab sched_lock to set
the TDF_NEEDSIGCHK and TDF_ASTPENDING flags in signotify().
- Add a proc lock assertion to tdsigwakeup().
- Since we always set TDF_OLDMASK while holding the proc lock, the proc
lock is sufficient protection to check its state in postsig() and we only
need sched_lock when clearing the actual flag.
kern_sigtimedwait() which is capable of supporting all of their semantics.
- These should be POSIX compliant but more careful review is needed before
we announce this.
a follow on commit to kern_sig.c
- signotify() now operates on a thread since unmasked pending signals are
stored in the thread.
- PS_NEEDSIGCHK moves to TDF_NEEDSIGCHK.
- Change all consumers to pass in a thread.
Right now this does not cause any functional changes but it will be important
later when signals can be delivered to specific threads.
