Due to how the linker.hints file is laid out, we'll associate the pnp
info with the wrong module if the module declaration comes after the
pnp info. Until that limiation is removed, we need to have this
ordering. Ideally, we'd also enforce the ordering somehow, but I've
come up with no way to do that yet...
Revison 222167 added a new argument to VFS_FHTOVP. This revision updates the
man page to match.
Reviewed by: rmacklem
MFC after: 3 days
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20323
ed(4) and ep(4) have been removed. fxp(4) remains popular in older
systems, but isn't as future proof as em(4).
Reviewed by: bz, jhb
MFC after: 3 days
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20311
This is described in the vmem paper: "directs vmem to use the next free
segment after the one previously allocated." The implementation adds a
new boundary tag type, M_CURSOR, which is linked into the segment list
and precedes the segment following the previous M_NEXTFIT allocation.
The cursor is used to locate the next free segment satisfying the
allocation constraints.
This implementation isn't O(1) since busy tags aren't coalesced, and we
may potentially scan the entire segment list during an M_NEXTFIT
allocation.
Reviewed by: alc
MFC after: 1 month
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17226
tun(4) and tap(4) share the same general management interface and have a lot
in common. Bugs exist in tap(4) that have been fixed in tun(4), and
vice-versa. Let's reduce the maintenance requirements by merging them
together and using flags to differentiate between the three interface types
(tun, tap, vmnet).
This fixes a couple of tap(4)/vmnet(4) issues right out of the gate:
- tap devices may no longer be destroyed while they're open [0]
- VIMAGE issues already addressed in tun by kp
[0] emaste had removed an easy-panic-button in r240938 due to devdrn
blocking. A naive glance over this leads me to believe that this isn't quite
complete -- destroy_devl will only block while executing d_* functions, but
doesn't block the device from being destroyed while a process has it open.
The latter is the intent of the condvar in tun, so this is "fixed" (for
certain definitions of the word -- it wasn't really broken in tap, it just
wasn't quite ideal).
ifconfig(8) also grew the ability to map an interface name to a kld, so
that `ifconfig {tun,tap}0` can continue to autoload the correct module, and
`ifconfig vmnet0 create` will now autoload the correct module. This is a
low overhead addition.
(MFC commentary)
This may get MFC'd if many bugs in tun(4)/tap(4) are discovered after this,
and how critical they are. Changes after this are likely easily MFC'd
without taking this merge, but the merge will be easier.
I have no plans to do this MFC as of now.
Reviewed by: bcr (manpages), tuexen (testing, syzkaller/packetdrill)
Input also from: melifaro
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20044
device_printf does multiple calls to printf allowing other console messages to
be inserted between the device name, and the rest of the message. This change
uses sbuf to compose to two into a single buffer, and prints it all at once.
It exposes an sbuf drain function (drain-to-printf) for common use.
Update documentation to match; some unit tests included.
Submitted by: jmg
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16690
By default, cores are now assigned to queues in a sequential
manner rather than all NICs starting at the first core. On a four-core
system with two NICs each using two queue pairs, the nic:queue -> core
mapping has changed from this:
0:0 -> 0, 0:1 -> 1
1:0 -> 0, 1:1 -> 1
To this:
0:0 -> 0, 0:1 -> 1
1:0 -> 2, 1:1 -> 3
Additionally, a device can now be configured to use separate cores for TX
and RX queues.
Two new tunables have been added, dev.X.Y.iflib.separate_txrx and
dev.X.Y.iflib.core_offset. If core_offset is set, the NIC is not part
of the auto-assigned sequence.
Reviewed by: marius
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Limelight Networks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20029
