Add some comments to explain how 10 was picked. 20 was completely
arbitrary, at least 10 has some reasoning behind it.
Also, update the comments about how long we sleep to reflect the new,
shorter timeout we use.
(1) change debounce period from 1s to 250ms. This appears to be fine and
speeds things up a little.
(2) In the middle of cbb_pcic_power_disable_socket we write 0 to the EXCA_INTR
register to put the card into reset. However, this turns off CSC
interrupts for TI bridges (and maybe others). So no further card
insertion events would be noticed. To compensate, after we've gone
through the entire power down sequence, turn on EXCA_INTR_ENABLE so
that CSC events happen.
#2 should fix the 'dead slot' problem that has been reported after
card ejection (but only 16-bit cards).
device pointers. They don't change as the children device drivers
come and go. Rather, check to see if the device is attached where we
would have checked ! NULL. This solves many asymmetries in the code
that likely could lead to crashes when loading/unloading cbb without
one or more of the expected children's driver not present.
o When detaching all children, try really hard to get all the children
list before giving up. This is based on an observation by hans petter
selasky in his usb p4 branch.
o When rescanning devices after a driver is added, abort if we can't get
the child list with a message.
o when rescanning devices, if the reprobe/attach is successful, save the
device for cardbus/pccard.
o when turning off the socket for a 16-bit card, write 0 to INTR register
rather than just tying to just clear the rest bit. this seems to fix
card insert detection after an eject on TI bridges (ricoh bridges work
either way, apparently). This is a MFp4.
o Cope better with TOPIC95 bridges on powerup. According to NetBSD driver,
these bridges don't set POWER_STATE, so cope accordingly in our power
code. They also need a little extra time to settle, so do that as well.
o It appears that we need to turn on/off one of the clocks to the card
when we power up/down that socket on a TOPIC97, also from NetBSD.
o TOPIC97 bridges need to specifically enable LV card support. Unconditionally
do this in the hopes that all laptops that have these chips support LV
voltages (they should, since they are required for CardBus).
o TOPIC register name regularization. Registers specific to models of TOPIC
are now called out as such.
# I need a machine with a TOPIC95 for testing.
it. We just moved it to be pci specific, so this was causing compile
problems (linking problems, so I didn't notice since I unwisely just
built the module).
was done, I believe, to work around some cards having issues in the
suspend case. I think that this helped my Sony VAIO TS505 work better
when it had certain wireless cards in it and I did a apm -z. I've not
tested suspend/resume on other laptops in a long time, so I hope this
doesn't cause greif. Please let me know if it does.
of cases where we didn't take out the lock before setting or clearing
a bit. This apparently can lead to a race at kldunload time (at least
on my Turion64 laptop, never saw it on my Sony Vaio).
in the ISR doesn't read the actual socket event register, but instead
reads garbage (usually 0xffffffff, but other times other things).
This totally violates the PCI spec, but happens rarely enough that a
workaround is in order. This adds one test when we have a real
interrupt to service (which is very rare), and doesn't affect the
usualy 'nothing to see here' case at all.
Problem reported by many, but sam@ gave me this workaround after
diagnosing the problem.
socket also supports the voltage. Some XV cards have appeared on the
scene (or cards that report they support XV), and in older machines
that have sockets that do not support XV, we were bogusly trying to
power them at XV rather than at 3.3V. Now, power up the card at the
lowest voltage supported by both the card and the socket.
MFC After: 3 days
than just deleting them. Also add comments about why we do this.
Given the current behavior of delete_child, I don't think this changes
anything. It just feels cleaner.
try very hard to be perfect. However, these attempts broke down when
there were large numbers of resources. We'd not be able to map them all.
Instead, accept that we might pass more range to thse subbus than
might be optimal be able to compute. However, there's little harm in
this and it allows us to pass greater resources through.
# it has been suggested that we allocate a fixed amount of resources
# on attach and give it out upon request. This might not be a bad idea...
the ExCA spec, and close cousins:
o Write an activate routine that works.
o merge a couple of items from oldcard before they are lost
o write a deactivate routine
I suspect we're still a ways away from having this work, but maybe for
6.1/5.5?
o Rather than just try to turn off EXCA_INTR_RESET, set the entire register
to 0. This is slightly faster, and a better hammer.
o Move attempted clearing of the output enable (EXCA_PWRCTL_OE) back to
after we turn off the power. Modify it to write 0 so that we don't get
Bad Vcc messages on TI bridges (untested, but ru@ sent me a similar patch)
while at the same time avoiding interrupt storms on Ricoh bridges (tested
by me on my Sony).
# Many of my observations of 'breakage' for this patch are due to some bug
# in the load/unload of cbb.ko unlreated to this change. I'll be investigating
# and fixing that bug in the fullness of time.
16-bit cards when we're powering them up. Other bridges may have
similar issues, so we do this for all of them by setting the
interrupt in the PCIC register 3 to be 0 (done always anyway)
and turning on the bit in the bridge control register to route these
interrupts via the ISA bus (or via the interrupt configured in the
PCIC register 3). '0' means disable completely. There's a small
chance this may interfere with the o2micro power hacks, but I'll
wait for reports to come in from o2micro users.
o Expand some of the comments about why we do certain things.
# this gets rid of the interrupt storm warnings on my 505TS. I think
# that we may need to do something similar on suspend, but I'm unsure
# since I don't have a laptop that supports suspened/resume with a
# ricoh chipset in it.
card. Mask it while we're doing power things, as the PC Card standard
suggests. Also, poll the POWER_CYCLE bit 10x a second as well as
providing a timeout for power cycle interrupt to happen.
The Ricoh '475 that I have doesn't seem to generate an interrupt for
power at the present time, so the polling is necessary for reasons as
yet unknown. This results in an interrupt storm warning that I'm
still trying to quantify (the o2micro trick doesn't work to mitigate
this storm). At the very least, this should help those users that
lost pccards on boot with the prior rev of this code. My VAIO
PCG-505TS is now happier, but more investigation is necessary.
