Trim trailing whitespace and comments before parsing, and skip empty lines.
Skip subvendor / subdevice entries (which start with two tab characters).
Change the scanf() format string to match any amount and type of whitespace
between the device ID and the description text.
MFC after: 3 weeks
and list_verbose(), so don't open /dev/pci read-write. This allows
pciconf -l[v] to work for non-root users, assuming the securelevel is
0 or -1.
Problem experienced by: William Michael Grim <wgrim@siue.edu>
synopsis, and the man page description ("selector" vs. "sel" and
"addr" vs. "reg").
Fix the usage message and man page synopsis to show that the "value"
argument is not optional.
- Read the database from /usr/share/misc (or wherever else we're pointed)
rather than compiling it in.
- Decode the class/subclass fields if requested.
- Print things in a slightly longer but more readable format.
background ]
Rename sys/pci/pci_ioctl.h to sys/sys/pciio.h to make it easier for
userland programs to use this interface. Reformat the file, and add a
BSD-style copyright to it.
Add a new man page for pci(4). The PCIOCGETCONF, PCIOCREAD, and PCIOCWRITE
ioctls are documented, but the PCIOCATTACHED ioctl is not documented
because it is not implemented.
Change includes of <pci/pci_ioctl.h> to <sys/pciio.h> or remove them
altogether. In many cases, pci_ioctl.h was unused.
Reviewed by: steve
configured in the kernel. It gives them a device name of "none" and
monotonically incrementing unit numbers. (starting at 0) Before, pciconf
would just skip over unconfigured devices. (unconfigured devices can be
detected because they have a null string for a device name)
Update the man page to reflect the new pciconf output. Unfortunately, this
causes the sample 'pciconf -l' output lines to wrap, but I'm not sure what
to do about that really.
If anyone presents a reasonable case for printing out something other than
"none1" for unconfigured devices, I'm willing to listen.
Add printing of PCI header type register. (This makes the output
80 columns wide. Ughh. I'm looking for a better way to put the
information on one line ...)
