OR the physical address with alpha_XXX_dmamap_or to get the DMA address,
like the name of the variable suggests. However, while we were doing
this correctly in the alpha_XXX_dmamap() macro, the busdma code added
the variable to the physical address instead of or'ing it. Fortunately
and if my math is not entirely wrong, you would need more than 128GB of
RAM and a device able to do DMA in 64bits to experience the bug.
Spotted by: cognet
long filename. Each substring is indexed by the windows ID, a
sequential one-based value. The previous code was extremely slow,
doing a malloc/strcpy/free for each substring.
This code optimizes these routines with this in mind, using the ID
to index into a single array and concatenating each WIN_CHARS chunk
at once. (The last chunk is variable-length.)
This code has been tested as working on an FS with difficult filename
sizes (255, 13, 26, etc.) It gives a 77.1% decrease in profiled
time (total across all functions) and a 73.7% decrease in wall time.
Test was "ls -laR > /dev/null".
Per-function time savings:
mbnambuf_init: -90.7%
mbnambuf_write: -18.7%
mbnambuf_flush: -67.1%
MFC after: 1 month
socket lock around knlist_init(), so don't.
Hard code the setting of the socket reference count to 1 rather than
using soref() to avoid asserting the socket lock, since we've not yet
exposed the socket to other threads.
This removes two mutex operations from each socket allocation.
so that the socket does not generate SIGPIPE, only EPIPE, when a write
is attempted after socket shutdown. When the option was introduced in
2002, this required the logic for determining whether SIGPIPE was
generated to be pushed down from dofilewrite() to the socket layer so
that the socket options could be considered. However, the change in
2002 omitted modification to soo_write() required to add that logic,
resulting in SIGPIPE not being generated even without SO_NOSIGPIPE when
the socket was written to using write() or related generic system calls.
This change adds the EPIPE logic to soo_write(), generating a SIGPIPE
signal to the process associated with the passed uio in the event that
the SO_NOSIGPIPE option is not set.
Notes:
- The are upsides and downsides to placing this logic in the socket
layer as opposed to the file descriptor layer. This is really fd
layer logic, but because we need so_options, we have a choice of
layering violations and pick this one.
- SIGPIPE possibly should be delivered to the thread performing the
write, not the process performing the write.
- uio->uio_td and the td argument to soo_write() might potentially
differ; we use the thread in the uio argument.
- The "sigpipe" regression test in src/tools/regression/sockets/sigpipe
tests for the bug.
Submitted by: Mikko Tyolajarvi <mbsd at pacbell dot net>
Talked with: glebius, alfred
PR: 78478
MFC after: 1 week
to syncrhonize access to the data as a result. This makes the pps
less likely to miss the 1ms pulse that I'm feeding it, but not
entirely reliable yet on my 133MHz P5.
Reviewed by: phk
unknown (since my sony vaio didn't :-(.
Instead, fix the problem described by 1.49 in a different way: just
add the two calls I'd hoped I'd avoid in 1.49 by doing the (wrong)
gymnastics there. While 1.49 is a good direction to go in, each step
of the way should work :-(.
resources. When allocating 6 ports for a 4 port range isa code
returns an error. I'm not sure yet why this is the case, but suspect
it is just a non-regularity in how the resource allocation code works
which should be corrected. Use 1 as the ports size in this case.
However, in the hints case, we have to specify the length, so use 6 in
that case. I believe that this is also acpi friendly.
Also, complain when we can't allocate FDOUT register space. Right now we
silently fail when we can't. This failure is referred to above.
When there's no resource for FDCTL, go ahead and allocate one by hand.
Many PNPBIOS tables don't list this resource, and our hints mechanism also
doesn't cover that range. If we can't allocate it, whine, but fake up
something. Before, we were always bogusly faking it and no one noticed
the sham (save the original author who has now fixed his private shame).
