Clang from 9.0.0 onwards already has the necessary relocation range
extenders, so this workaround is no longer needed (it produces longer
and slower code). Tested on real hardware, and in cross-compile
environment.
Submitted by: mmel
versions, use "git describe --tags --long" output, which is more
descriptive. E.g., "90c78073f73eac58f4f8b4772a896dc8aac023bc" becomes
"llvmorg-10.0.0-rc2-0-g90c78073f73".
clang binary, with:
ld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::EnableABIBreakingChecks
>>> referenced by PlistDiagnostics.cpp
>>> PlistDiagnostics.o:(.sdata+0x0) in archive /usr/obj/usr/src/riscv.riscv64/lib/clang/libclang/libclang.a
[... many more like this ...]
When bootstrapping on powerpc64 ELFv1, it is necessary to use binutils
ld.bfd from ports for the bootstrap, as this is the only modern linker for
ELFv1 host tools.
As binutils ld.bfd is rather strict in its handling of undefined symbols,
it is necessary to pull in Support/Atomic.cpp to avoid an undefined symbol.
Reviewed by: dim, emaste
Sponsored by: Tag1 Consulting, Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23072
This uses the new layout of the upstream repository, which was recently
migrated to GitHub, and converted into a "monorepo". That is, most of
the earlier separate sub-projects with their own branches and tags were
consolidated into one top-level directory, and are now branched and
tagged together.
Updating the vendor area to match this layout is next.
case. Otherwise, linking of clang and other llvm based executables
would complain about missing symbols.
Reported by: rstone
MFC after: 1 month
X-MFC-With: r353358
8.0.1 final release r366581. The only functional change is a fix for a
mismerge of upstream r360816, which properly restores the r2 register
when unwinding on PowerPC64 (See https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20337).
Relnotes: yes
PR: 236062
MFC after: 3 days
X-MFC-With: r349004
libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r364487
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc3). The 8.0.1 release will most likely
have no further changes.
MFC after: 1 week
X-MFC-With: r349004
libunwind and openmp to the upstream release_80 branch r363030
(effectively, 8.0.1 rc2). The 8.0.1 release should follow this within a
week or so.
MFC after: 2 weeks
To facilitate experimentation with LTO we require an ar that supports
LLVM IR, and to a lesser degree also an nm. As a first step always
install llvm-ar and llvm-nm.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
ASAN reports become a lot more useful with llvm-symbolizer in $PATH, and the
build is not much more time-consuming. The added benefit is that the
resulting reports will actually include symbol information; without, thread
trace information includes a bunch of addresses that immediately resolve to
an inline function in
^/contrib/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h and take a
little more effort to examine.
Reviewed by: emaste
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20484
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and repeated
my mistake from r345704 by accident mixing content from D19732 and D19738.
For my own personal sanity, I will try not to mix reviews like this in the
future.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345706
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
