a route to the gateway and caches it in the route structure.
It may happen (if the routing table is screwed) that the gateway
route is the same route as the one being modified, in which case
a kernel reports EDQUOT. Be more verbose about this:
# route add -net 10 192.168.4.65
add net 10: gateway 192.168.4.65
# netstat -rn -finet
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.4.65 UGSc 1 7 rl0
10 192.168.4.65 UGSc 0 0 rl0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 178 lo0
192.168.4 link#1 UC 2 0 rl0 =>
192.168.4.65 0:d0:b7:16:9c:c6 UHLW 2 0 rl0 1123
Before:
# route change -net 10 10.0.0.1
route: writing to routing socket: Disc quota exceeded
change net 10: gateway 10.0.0.1: Disc quota exceeded
After:
# ./route change -net 10 10.0.0.1
route: writing to routing socket: Disc quota exceeded
change net 10: gateway 10.0.0.1: gateway uses the same route
PR: bin/1093, misc/26833
PR: bin/12489
- Use inet_ntoa(3) where it should have been used. This
part of code simply wasn't converted to the "new" style
after the routename() function was converted from the
protocol-generic version to protocol-specific version
in CSRG revision 5.6.
MFC after: 1 week
to be the same as -ragged in the current implementation) to
-ragged. With mdocNG, -filled displays produce the correct
output, formatted and justified to both margins.
packet divert at kernel for IPv6/IPv4 translater daemon
This includes queue related patch submitted by jburkhol@home.com.
Submitted by: queue related patch from jburkhol@home.com
Reviewed by: freebsd-arch, cvs-committers
Obtained from: KAME project
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!)
avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been
insane otherwise.
Submitted by: archie@whistle.com
This patch allows true interface routing to be controlled
from the command line..
you can now do:
route add default -interface ppp0
even if you have no clue what the address at the other end is..
this is part of a set of changes that allow true "unnumbered links"
such as netcom run between their sites..
In practice you should assign the address from one of your ethernet
interfaces to the local side of the P2P link so that IP doesn't
say that the packet comes from 255.255.255.255, but
there is no need whatsoever to assign an address of any kind
to the remote end of the link.. useful for frame relay links etc also.
