Commit Graph

77 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pedro F. Giffuni
c820acbf0a msdosfs: fixes for Undefined Behavior.
These were found by the Undefined Behaviour GsoC project at NetBSD:

Do not change signedness bit with left shift.
While there avoid signed integer overflow.
Address both issues with using unsigned type.

msdosfs_fat.c:512:42, left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented
in type 'int'
msdosfs_fat.c:521:44, left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented
in type 'int'
msdosfs_fat.c:744:14, left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented
in type 'int'
msdosfs_fat.c:744:24, signed integer overflow: -2147483648 - 1 cannot be
represented in type 'int [20]'
msdosfs_fat.c:840:13, left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented
in type 'int'
msdosfs_fat.c:840:36, signed integer overflow: -2147483648 - 1 cannot be
represented in type 'int [20]'

Detected with micro-UBSan in the user mode.

Hinted from:	NetBSD (CVS 1.33)
MFC after:	2 weeks
Differenctial Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16615
2018-08-08 15:08:22 +00:00
Kirk McKusick
4111ab7088 Revert change made in base r171522
(https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=304232)
converting clrbuf() (which clears the entire buffer) to vfs_bio_clrbuf()
(which clears only the new pages that have been added to the buffer).

Failure to properly remove pages from the buffer cache can make
pages that appear not to need clearing to actually have bad random
data in them. See for example base r304232
(https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=304232)
which noted the need to set B_INVAL and B_NOCACHE as well as clear
the B_CACHE flag before calling brelse() to release the buffer.

Rather than trying to find all the incomplete brelse() calls, it
is simpler, though more slightly expensive, to simply clear the
entire buffer when it is newly allocated.

PR: 213507
Submitted by: Damjan Jovanovic
Reviewed by:  kib
2018-05-16 23:30:03 +00:00
Pedro F. Giffuni
d63027b668 sys/fs: further adoption of SPDX licensing ID tags.
Mainly focus on files that use BSD 2-Clause license, however the tool I
was using misidentified many licenses so this was mostly a manual - error
prone - task.

The Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) group provides a specification
to make it easier for automated tools to detect and summarize well known
opensource licenses. We are gradually adopting the specification, noting
that the tags are considered only advisory and do not, in any way,
superceed or replace the license texts.
2017-11-27 15:15:37 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
4eeec01fee Style.
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after:	2 weeks
2017-08-28 21:04:56 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
fbcbbe78dc Verify that the BPB media descriptor and FAT ID match.
FAT specification requires that for valid FAT, FAT cluster 0 has a
specific value derived from the BPB media descriptor.  The lowest
(little-endian) byte must be equal to bpb.bpbMedia, other bits in the
cluster number must be all 1's.  Implement the check to reduce the
chance of the randomly corrupted FAT to pass the mount attempt.

Submitted by:	Siva Mahadevan <smahadevan@freebsdfoundation.org>
MFC after:	2 weeks
Differential revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12124
2017-08-28 20:52:32 +00:00
Ed Maste
1f7d7cd76a msdosfs: reformat a comment to reduce NetBSD diffs 2017-06-22 01:11:20 +00:00
Ed Maste
6a1c2e1fce msdosfs: use mem{cpy,move,set} instead of bcopy,bzero
This somewhat simplifies use of msdosfs code in userland (for makefs),
reduces diffs with NetBSD and is standard C as of C89.

Reviewed by:	imp
MFC after:	1 month
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11014
2017-06-02 18:39:53 +00:00
Ed Maste
9287dbaae9 msdosfs: capitalize FAT appropriately
Diff reduction with NetBSD, including some nearby minor whitespace or
style fixes.

Obtained from:	NetBSD
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
2017-05-21 19:29:28 +00:00
Ed Maste
23c5331208 msdosfs: use C99 types
General cleanup, for diff reduction with NetBSD and future use by FAT
support in makefs.

Submitted by:	Siva Mahadevan <smahadevan@freebsdfoundation.org>
Obtained from:	NetBSD
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10821
2017-05-19 18:13:41 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
b05088aeeb Ensure that cluster allocations never allocate clusters outside the
volume limits.  In particular:
- Assert that usemap_alloc() and usemap_free() cluster number argument
  is valid.
- In chainlength(), return 0 if cluster start is after the max cluster.
- In chainlength(), cut the calculated cluster chain length at the max
  cluster.
- For true paranoia, after the pm_inusemap is calculated in
  fillinusemap(), reset all bits in the array for clusters after the
  max cluster, as in-use.

Reported and tested by:	pho
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after:	2 weeks
2016-10-28 11:34:32 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
03b8a419e4 If the fatchain() call in chainalloc() returned an error, revert
marking the cluster run as in-use.

Tested by:	pho
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after:	2 weeks
2016-10-28 11:26:44 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
f33d62b2d2 Use symbolic name for the value of fully free word in pm_inusemap.
Explicitely mention every bit in the value.

Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after:	2 weeks
2016-10-28 11:23:36 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
1c4ec415e2 Use symbolic name for the free cluster number.
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after:	2 weeks
2016-10-28 11:01:49 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
f220587d03 Fix comment formatting.
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after:	2 weeks
2016-10-28 10:59:34 +00:00
Pedro F. Giffuni
b3a15ddd5b sys/fs: spelling fixes in comments.
No functional change.
2016-04-29 20:51:24 +00:00
Pedro F. Giffuni
0d3e502f92 fs misc: for pointers replace 0 with NULL.
Mostly cosmetical, no functional change.

Found with devel/coccinelle.
2016-04-15 17:28:24 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
420d65d9e4 Assert that an msdosfs mount is not read-only when FAT modifications
are requested.

PR:	199152
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after:	1 week
2015-04-05 21:08:04 +00:00
Ed Maste
4882501b5c ANSIfy msdosfs
Add a few cases and style(9) fixes missed in r276887

Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
2015-01-12 21:55:48 +00:00
Ed Maste
10c9700f3e ANSIfy sys/fs/msdosfs
There are a number of msdosfs improvements in NetBSD that may be worth
bringing over, and this reduces noise in the comparison.

Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1466
Reviewed by:	kib
Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
2015-01-09 14:50:08 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
bb7ca8229d Do not update the fsinfo block on each update of any fat block, this
is excessive. Postpone the flush of the fsinfo to VFS_SYNC(),
remembering the need for update with the flag MSDOSFS_FSIMOD, stored
in pm_flags.

FAT32 specification describes both FSI_Free_Count and FSI_Nxt_Free as
the advisory hints, not requiring them to be correct.

Based on the patch from bde, modified by me.

Reviewed by: bde
MFC after:   2 weeks
2013-02-17 20:35:54 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
11fca81ccd The MSDOSFSMNT_WAITONFAT flag is bogus and broken. It does less than
track the MNT_SYNCHRONOUS flag.  It is set to the latter at mount time
but not updated by MNT_UPDATE.

Use MNT_SYNCHRONOUS to decide to write the FAT updates syncrhonously.

Submitted by:	bde
MFC after:	1 week
2013-02-01 18:30:41 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
79fb7dd167 Backup FATs were sometimes marked dirty by copying their first block
from the primary FAT, and then they were not marked clean on unmount.
Force marking them clean when appropriate.

Submitted by:	bde
MFC after:	1 week
2013-02-01 18:25:53 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
a26b949f2d Fix a backwards comment in markvoldirty().
Submitted by:	bde
MFC after:	1 week
2013-02-01 17:58:37 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
54cf919857 Put all the messages from msdosfs under the MSDOSFS_DEBUG ifdef.
They are confusing to user, and not informative for general consumption.

MFC after:	1 week
2011-11-22 13:30:36 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
eb739c7cd5 Add assertions for FAT bitmap state.
Tested by:	pho
MFC after:	3 weeks
2010-02-28 17:15:45 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
6be1a4cc5f Use pm_fatlock to protect fat bitmap.
Tested by:	pho
MFC after:	3 weeks
2010-02-28 17:13:59 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
ef6a2be307 Assert that the msdosfs vnode is (e)locked in several places.
The plan is to use vnode lock to protect denode and fat cache,
and having separate lock for block use map.

Change the check and return on impossible condition into KASSERT().

Tested by:	pho
MFC after:	3 weeks
2010-02-28 17:07:49 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
35fcc0662b Remove unused global statistic about fat cache usage.
Tested by:	pho
MFC after:	3 weeks
2010-02-28 17:06:42 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
3c8b687fe1 Invalid filesystem might cause the bp to be never read.
Noted by:	Pedro F. Giffuni <giffunip tutopia com>
Obtanined from:	NetBSD
MFC after:	1 week
2010-02-14 12:10:49 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
67c7bbf39c In rev. 1.17 (r33548) of msdosfs_fat.c, relative cluster numbers were
replaced by file relative sector numbers as the buffer block number when
zero-padding a file during extension. Revert the change, it causes wrong
blocks filled with zeroes on seeking beyond end of file.

PR:	kern/47628
Submitted by:	tegge
MFC after:	3 days
2008-09-01 13:18:16 +00:00
Tom Rhodes
ededffc06b Remove some debugging code that, while useful, doesn't belong in the committed
version.  While here, expand a macro only used once.

Discussed with/oked by:	bde
2007-10-25 08:23:08 +00:00
Bruce Evans
ed316d339f Remove some of the pessimizations involving writing the fsi sector.
All active fields in fsi are advisory/optional, so we shouldn't do
extra work to make them valid at all times, but instead we write to
the fsi too often (we still do), and we searched for a free cluster
for fsinxtfree too often.

This commit just removes the whole search and its results, so that we
write out our in-core copy of fsinxtfree instead of writing a "fixed"
copy and clobbering our in-core copy.  This saves fixing 3 bugs:
- off-by-1 error for the end of the search, resulting in fsinxtfree
  not actually being adjusted iff only the last cluster is free.
- missing adjustment when no clusters are free.
- off-by-many error for the start of the search.  Starting the search
  at 0 instead of at (the in-core copy of) fsinxtfree did more than
  defeat the reasons for existence of fsinxtfree.  fsinxtfree exists
  mainly to avoid having to start at 0 for just the first search per
  mount, but has the side effect of reducing bias towards allocating
  near cluster 0.  The bias would normally only be generated by the
  first search per mount (if fsinxtfree is not supported), but since
  we also adjusted the in-core copy of fsinxtfree here, we were doing
  extra work to maximize the bias.

Approved by:	re (kensmith)
2007-09-23 14:49:32 +00:00
Bruce Evans
b6d0381e7e Fix some style bugs (some whitespace errors only).
Approved by:	re (kensmith) (blanket)
2007-08-07 03:22:10 +00:00
Bruce Evans
5696c6e0b2 Sort includes.
Remove banal comments before includes.  Remove rotted banal comments attached
to includes.

Approved by:	re (kensmith) (blanket)
2007-08-07 02:20:37 +00:00
Bruce Evans
6fd81fc7a6 Remove unused include(s).
Approved by:	re (kensmith) (blanket)
2007-08-07 01:07:16 +00:00
Bruce Evans
3726942956 Oops, fix the fix for the i/o size of the fsinfo block. Its log
message explained why the size is 1 sector, but the code used a
size of 1 cluster.

I/o sizes larger than necessary may cause serious coherency problems
in the buffer cache.  Here I think there were only minor efficiency
problems, since a too-large fsinfo buffer could only get far enough
to overlap buffers for the same vnode (the device vnode), so mappings
are coherent at the page level although not at the buffer level, and
the former is probably enough due to our limited use of the fsinfo
buffer.

Approved by:	re (kensmith)
2007-08-03 23:13:50 +00:00
Bruce Evans
d34b0a1bac Clean up before implementing vfs clustering for msdosfs:
In msdosfs_read(), mainly reorder the main loop to the same order as in
ffs_read().

In msdosfs_write() and extendfile(), use vfs_bio_clrbuf() instead of
clrbuf().  I think this just just a bogus optimization, but ffs always
does it and msdosfs already did it in one place, and it is what I've
tested.

In msdosfs_write(), merge good bits from a comment in ffs_write(), and
fix 1 style bug.

In the main comment for msdosfs_pcbmap(), improve wording and catch
up with 13 years of changes in the function.  This comment belongs in
VOP_BMAP.9 but that doesn't exist.

In msdosfs_bmap(), return EFBIG if the requested cluster number is out
of bounds instead of blindly truncating it, and fix many style bugs.

Approved by:	re (hrs)
2007-07-20 16:21:47 +00:00
Bruce Evans
fd7c4230b2 Fix some bugs involving the fsinfo block (many remain unfixed). This is
part of fixing msdosfs for large sector sizes.  One of the fixed bugs
was fatal for large sector sizes.

1. The fsinfo block has size 512, but it was misunderstood and declared
   as having size 1024, with nothing in the second 512 bytes except a
   signature at the end.  The second 512 bytes actually normally (if
   the file system was created by Windows) consist of a second boot
   sector which is normally (in WinXP) empty except for a signature --
   the normal layout is one boot sector, one fsinfo sector, another
   boot sector, then these 3 sectors duplicated.  However, other
   layouts are valid.  newfs_msdos produces a valid layout with one
   boot sector, one fsinfo sector, then these 2 sectors duplicated.
   The signature check for the extra part of the fsinfo was thus
   normally checking the signature in either the second boot sector
   or the first boot sector in the copy, and thus accidentally
   succeeding.  The extra signature check would just fail for weirder
   layouts with 512-byte sectors, and for normal layouts with any other
   sector size.

   Remove the extra bytes and the extra signature check.

2. Old versions did i/o to the fsinfo block using size 1024, with the
   second half only used for the extra signature check on read.  This
   was harmless for sector size 512, and worked accidentally for sector
   size 1024.  The i/o just failed for larger sector sizes.

   The version being fixed did i/o to the fsinfo block using size
   fsi_size(pmp) = (1024 << ((pmp)->pm_BlkPerSec >> 2)).  This
   expression makes no sense.  It happens to work for sector small
   sector sizes, but for sector size 32K it gives the preposterous
   value of 64M and thus causes panics.  A sector size of 32768 is
   necessary for at least some DVD-RW's (where the minimum write size
   is 32768 although the minimum read size is 2048).

   Now that the size of the fsinfo block is 512, it always fits in
   one sector so there is no need for a macro to express it.  Just
   use the sector size where the old code uses 1024.

Approved by:	re (kensmith)
Approved by:	nyan (several years ago for a different version of (2))
2007-07-12 16:09:07 +00:00
Bruce Evans
8e55bfaf4b Don't use almost perfectly pessimal cluster allocation. Allocation
of the the first cluster in a file (and, if the allocation cannot be
continued contiguously, for subsequent clusters in a file) was randomized
in an attempt to leave space for contiguous allocation of subsequent
clusters in each file when there are multiple writers.  This reduced
internal fragmentation by a few percent, but it increased external
fragmentation by up to a few thousand percent.

Use simple sequential allocation instead.  Actually maintain the fsinfo
sequence index for this.  The read and write of this index from/to
disk still have many non-critical bugs, but we now write an index that
has something to do with our allocations instead of being modified
garbage.  If there is no fsinfo on the disk, then we maintain the index
internally and don't go near the bugs for writing it.

Allocating the first free cluster gives a layout that is almost as good
(better in some cases), but takes too much CPU if the FAT is large and
the first free cluster is not near the beginning.

The effect of this change for untar and tar of a slightly reduced copy
of /usr/src on a new file system was:

Before (msdosfs 4K-clusters):
untar:  459.57 real              untar from cached file (actually a pipe)
tar:    342.50 real              tar from uncached tree to /dev/zero
Before (ffs2 soft updates 4K-blocks 4K-frags)
untar:   39.18 real
tar:     29.94 real
Before (ffs2 soft updates 16K-blocks 2K-frags)
untar:   31.35 real
tar:     18.30 real

After (msdosfs 4K-clusters):
untar    54.83 real
tar      16.18 real

All of these times can be improved further.

With multiple concurrent writers or readers (especially readers), the
improvement is smaller, but I couldn't find any case where it is
negative.  342 seconds for tarring up about 342 MB on a ~47MB/S partition
is just hard to unimprove on.  (This operation would take about 7.3
seconds with reasonably localized allocation and perfect read-ahead.)
However, for active file systems, 342 seconds is closer to normal than
the 16+ seconds above or the 11 seconds with other changes (best I've
measured -- won easily by msdosfs!).  E.g., my active /usr/src on ffs1
is quite old and fragmented, so reading to prepare for the above
benchmark takes about 6 times longer than reading back the fresh copies
of it.

Approved by:	re (kensmith)
2007-07-10 13:20:24 +00:00
Tom Rhodes
bade0e00f3 Fix spacing from my previous commit to this file:
Noticed by:	fjoe
2007-01-30 04:41:38 +00:00
Tom Rhodes
752945d6c0 Add a 3rd entry in the cache, which keeps the end position
from just before extending a file.  This has the desired effect
of keeping the write speed constant.  And yes, that helps a lot
copying large files always at full speed now, and I have seen
improvements using benchmarks/bonnie.

Stolen from:	NetBSD
Reviewed by:	bde
2007-01-16 23:43:14 +00:00
Warner Losh
d167cf6f3a /* -> /*- for copyright notices, minor format tweaks as necessary 2005-01-06 18:10:42 +00:00
Tim J. Robbins
d23af19a71 Merge from NetBSD:
Fix a panic that occurred when trying to traverse a corrupt msdosfs
filesystem.  With this particular corruption, the code in pcbmap()
would compute an offset into an array that was way out of bounds,
so check the bounds before trying to access and return an error if
the offset would be out of bounds.

Submitted by:	Xin LI
2004-09-08 10:57:09 +00:00
Bruce Evans
392dbea3f6 Fixed some (most) style bugs in rev.1.33. Mainly 4-char indentation
(msdosfs uses normal 8-char indentation almost everywhere else),
too-long lines, and minor English usage errors.  The verbose formal
comment before the new function is still abnormal.
2003-12-29 11:59:05 +00:00
Tom Rhodes
cede1f563c Make msdosfs support the dirty flag in FAT16 and FAT32.
Enable lockf support.

PR:		55861
Submitted by:	Jun Su <junsu@m-net.arbornet.org> (original version)
Reviewed by:	make universe
2003-12-26 17:19:19 +00:00
Jeff Roberson
7261f5f68e - Add a new 'flags' parameter to getblk().
- Define one flag GB_LOCK_NOWAIT that tells getblk() to pass the LK_NOWAIT
   flag to the initial BUF_LOCK().  This will eventually be used in cases
   were we want to use a buffer only if it is not currently in use.
 - Convert all consumers of the getblk() api to use this extra parameter.

Reviwed by:	arch
Not objected to by:	mckusick
2003-03-04 00:04:44 +00:00
Tom Rhodes
d394511de3 More s/file system/filesystem/g 2002-05-16 21:28:32 +00:00
Bruce Evans
b76d0b3217 Fixed some style bugs in the removal of __P(()). Continuation lines
were not outdented to preserve non-KNF lining up of code with parentheses.
Switch to KNF formatting.
2002-03-23 12:38:05 +00:00
Alfred Perlstein
11caded34f Remove __P. 2002-03-19 22:20:14 +00:00
Kirk McKusick
0d2af52141 Introduce the new 64-bit size disk block, daddr64_t. Change
the bio and buffer structures to have daddr64_t bio_pblkno,
b_blkno, and b_lblkno fields which allows access to disks
larger than a Terabyte in size. This change also requires
that the VOP_BMAP vnode operation accept and return daddr64_t
blocks. This delta should not affect system operation in
any way. It merely sets up the necessary interfaces to allow
the development of disk drivers that work with these larger
disk block addresses. It also allows for the development of
UFS2 which will use 64-bit block addresses.
2002-03-15 18:49:47 +00:00