running in process context in order to run interrupt handlers. This
caused a big smashing of the stack on AMD K6, K5 and Intel Pentium (ie, P5)
processors because we are using npxproc as a flag to indicate whether
the state has been pushed onto the stack.
Submitted by: bde
because libc/rpc/key_call.c references uname(), and ps/print.c also
defines uname(), and ps is linked statically. This leads to a symbol
clash. The userland uname(3) kinda sucked anyway as the hostname
etc was too short. And since the libc rpc interface now uses
the utsname.nodename which gets truncated, I was tempted into doing
something about it. Create a new userland uname function, called
__xuname() which takes an extra argument that allows you to change
the size of the fields. uname() becomes a static inline function
in sys/utsname.h that passes the extra argument in. struct utsname
has its field members expanded by default now in userland.
We still provide a 'uname' externally linkable function for things
that either think that they ``know'' the utsname format and assume
32 character strings and bypass the include file, or objects that
are linked against old libcs. ie: just about every plausible
case that I can think of is covered. Should we ever change the
default lengths again, a libc major bump should not be required
as the size is now passed to the function.
XXX the uname(2) in the kernel is for FreeBSD 1.1 binary compatability!
All the uname(3) functions that are exported to userland are actually
implemented in libc with sysctl. uname(1) uses sysctl directly and
does not call uname(3).
PR: bin/4688
that were removed from GCC 2.95.3.test4 and the subsequent release due
to problems on HP-UX. However, they work just fine on all the BSD's.
W/o these patches the following program segmentation faults if compiled
with -O2 (but not -Os or -O or -O0):
#include <stdio.h>
class A {
public:
A() { printf("c'tor A\n"); }
~A(){ printf("d'tor A\n"); }
};
class foo : public A {
public:
foo() { printf("C'tor foo\n"); throw 8; }
~foo() { printf("D'tor foo\n"); }
};
int main(){
try { foo fii; }
catch (int){ printf("catch ...\n"); }
return 0;
}
both should work in non-pnp mode, the 924 should also work in its rather
braindead pnp mode- it will adopt port 0x530 unless given hints due to it
starting up in soundblaster mode and thus not requesting a valid mss port
address.
Submitted by: George Reid <greid@ukug.uk.freebsd.org>
When we get an Open event in stopped state, experience shows that this
is usually means we've somehow missed a previous Down event. This has
occasionally bitten people for the IPCP layer with ISDN, apparently a
previously aborted IPCP negotiation must have caused this. As a
bandaid, we quickly pretent a Down event by advancing to starting
state; this effectively implements the `restart' option mentioned in
RFC 1663.
While i'm not yet fully convinced this is the best thing to do (and is
fully compliant with RFC 1661), i've seen a number of reports here on
the German mailing lists where people have been bitten by the previous
behaviour which usually causes quickly looping ISDN reconnects (thus
loss of money...), and where just this patch fixes the problem.
For this, i'd even like to see it MFC'd if possible.
Submitted by: Helmut Kreft <kreft@zeus.ai-lab.fh-furtwangen.de>
this impacts negatively to POLA since once autologin is enabled,
telnet will prompt for a password using getpass() and thus not allow
the usual signal characters or C-]
- fix a harmless bug in match_installed() function introduced in my last
commit;
- uniformely reorder includes across files.
Submitted by: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net>
Not objected by: jkh, -ports
1 Make promiscuous mode work
2 A few header additions
3 Allow device config before IFF_UP
These were (respectively)...
Submitted by: Allan Saddi <asaddi@philosophysw.com>
Submitted by: Dave Cornejo <dave@dogwood.com>
Submitted by: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com>
Tested by: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
- modeventhand_t declares a pointer to a function, so it can't be
used as a forward declaration (d'oh!)
Submitted by: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de>
