These changes add the ability to specify that a UFS file/directory
cannot be unlinked. This is basically a scaled back version
of the IMMUTABLE flag. The reason is to allow an administrator
to create a directory hierarchy that a group of users
can arbitrarily add/delete files from, but that the hierarchy
itself is safe from removal by them.
If the NOUNLINK definition is set to 0
then this results in no change to what happens normally.
(and results in identical binary (in the kernel)).
It can be proven that if this bit is never set by the admin,
no new behaviour is introduced..
Several "good idea" comments from reviewers plus one grumble
about creeping featurism.
This code is in production in 2.2 based systems
so that all these makefiles can be used to build libc_r too.
Added .if ${LIB} == "c" tests to restrict man page builds to libc
to avoid needlessly building them with libc_r too.
Split libc Makefile into Makefile and Makefile.inc to allow the
libc_r Makefile to include Makefile.inc too.
- dependencies actually work (I need this to propagate some fixes
in <machine/asm.h>)
- the cpp pipeline goes away, so errors can't leak out of it and
an ANSI cpp is automatically used.
- it's simpler - standard rules get used instead of repetitive
special rules. (This showed bugs in the strip steps in the
standard rules. The wrong strip flag was also used for *.po
here.)
Removed some ${ECHO}s and `@'s. Normal make echoing of what is
being done is now not much more verbose than the echo messages
were, and is more useful.
passes on the status across fork/exec.
The previous version had some typos, referred to itself as link(2) in
one place :-), and didn't really match openbsd's implementation either.
Now that I've mentioned typos, hopefully our Typo Police and Xref Police
will be gentle with me. :-)
The sa_mask field specified in act is not allowed to block SIGKILL or
SIGSTOP. Any attempt to do so will be silently ignored.
Now where did I leave that pointy hat...
Bruce says that since NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux currently
use ss_sp, we won't be changing it to the lite2 ss_base.
The type may change at some later date.
but in one case the Lite2 changes were flat out wrong and
caused the man page to disagree with a header file.
There are still some *roff macro calls that were added that
I have yet to figure out what to do with in some of the man pages.
