Attilio Rao 13ddf72de7 Really, no explicit checks against against lock_class_* object should be
done in consumers code: using locks properties is much more appropriate.
Fix current code doing these bogus checks.

Note: Really, callout are not usable by all !(LC_SPINLOCK | LC_SLEEPABLE)
primitives like rmlocks doesn't implement the generic lock layer
functions, but they can be equipped for this, so the check is still
valid.

Tested by: matteo, kris (earlier version)
Reviewed by: jhb
2008-02-06 00:04:09 +00:00
..
2008-01-20 23:44:24 +00:00
2007-11-15 14:16:20 +00:00
2008-01-02 18:48:27 +00:00
2007-12-17 08:09:37 +00:00
2007-12-14 21:30:51 +00:00
2008-01-02 17:09:15 +00:00
2008-01-20 23:44:24 +00:00
2008-02-04 12:25:13 +00:00
2008-02-04 12:25:13 +00:00