Adrian Chadd 88ecff8b96 [iwm] fix up the rate control setup code to initialise rates in the order ... we want to use it. The rate table was being initialised in low->high, but the link quality table was being initialised high->low. So, when we did a lookup, we would get the indexes wrong. This started by a patch from dragonflybsd which reversed how the ni->in_ridx[] array is being used; I'd rather it all be consistent. So, this is consistent. Inspired by: what I did to iwn(4) a while ago Inspired by: DragonflyBSD; <imre@vdsz.com>		2016-01-18 05:43:34 +00:00
..
if_iwm_binding.c
if_iwm_binding.h
if_iwm_debug.h
if_iwm_mac_ctxt.c
if_iwm_mac_ctxt.h
if_iwm_pcie_trans.c
if_iwm_pcie_trans.h
if_iwm_phy_ctxt.c
if_iwm_phy_ctxt.h
if_iwm_phy_db.c
if_iwm_phy_db.h
if_iwm_power.c
if_iwm_power.h
if_iwm_scan.c
if_iwm_scan.h
if_iwm_time_event.c
if_iwm_time_event.h
if_iwm_util.c
if_iwm_util.h
if_iwm.c	[iwm] fix up the rate control setup code to initialise rates in the order	2016-01-18 05:43:34 +00:00
if_iwmreg.h
if_iwmvar.h	iwm: store pointer for 'struct firmware' instead of	2016-01-04 21:03:01 +00:00