497e80a371
of unnecessary path components that are relics of cvs2svn. (These are directory moves)
1338 lines
36 KiB
C
1338 lines
36 KiB
C
/* Allocation for dataflow support routines.
|
||
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
|
||
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
||
Originally contributed by Michael P. Hayes
|
||
(m.hayes@elec.canterbury.ac.nz, mhayes@redhat.com)
|
||
Major rewrite contributed by Danny Berlin (dberlin@dberlin.org)
|
||
and Kenneth Zadeck (zadeck@naturalbridge.com).
|
||
|
||
This file is part of GCC.
|
||
|
||
GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
|
||
the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
|
||
Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later
|
||
version.
|
||
|
||
GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY
|
||
WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
||
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
||
for more details.
|
||
|
||
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
||
along with GCC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free
|
||
Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
|
||
02110-1301, USA.
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
OVERVIEW:
|
||
|
||
The files in this collection (df*.c,df.h) provide a general framework
|
||
for solving dataflow problems. The global dataflow is performed using
|
||
a good implementation of iterative dataflow analysis.
|
||
|
||
The file df-problems.c provides problem instance for the most common
|
||
dataflow problems: reaching defs, upward exposed uses, live variables,
|
||
uninitialized variables, def-use chains, and use-def chains. However,
|
||
the interface allows other dataflow problems to be defined as well.
|
||
|
||
|
||
USAGE:
|
||
|
||
Here is an example of using the dataflow routines.
|
||
|
||
struct df *df;
|
||
|
||
df = df_init (init_flags);
|
||
|
||
df_add_problem (df, problem, flags);
|
||
|
||
df_set_blocks (df, blocks);
|
||
|
||
df_rescan_blocks (df, blocks);
|
||
|
||
df_analyze (df);
|
||
|
||
df_dump (df, stderr);
|
||
|
||
df_finish (df);
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
DF_INIT simply creates a poor man's object (df) that needs to be
|
||
passed to all the dataflow routines. df_finish destroys this object
|
||
and frees up any allocated memory.
|
||
|
||
There are three flags that can be passed to df_init, each of these
|
||
flags controls the scanning of the rtl:
|
||
|
||
DF_HARD_REGS means that the scanning is to build information about
|
||
both pseudo registers and hardware registers. Without this
|
||
information, the problems will be solved only on pseudo registers.
|
||
DF_EQUIV_NOTES marks the uses present in EQUIV/EQUAL notes.
|
||
DF_SUBREGS return subregs rather than the inner reg.
|
||
|
||
|
||
DF_ADD_PROBLEM adds a problem, defined by an instance to struct
|
||
df_problem, to the set of problems solved in this instance of df. All
|
||
calls to add a problem for a given instance of df must occur before
|
||
the first call to DF_RESCAN_BLOCKS, DF_SET_BLOCKS or DF_ANALYZE.
|
||
|
||
For all of the problems defined in df-problems.c, there are
|
||
convenience functions named DF_*_ADD_PROBLEM.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Problems can be dependent on other problems. For instance, solving
|
||
def-use or use-def chains is dependent on solving reaching
|
||
definitions. As long as these dependencies are listed in the problem
|
||
definition, the order of adding the problems is not material.
|
||
Otherwise, the problems will be solved in the order of calls to
|
||
df_add_problem. Note that it is not necessary to have a problem. In
|
||
that case, df will just be used to do the scanning.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
DF_SET_BLOCKS is an optional call used to define a region of the
|
||
function on which the analysis will be performed. The normal case is
|
||
to analyze the entire function and no call to df_set_blocks is made.
|
||
|
||
When a subset is given, the analysis behaves as if the function only
|
||
contains those blocks and any edges that occur directly between the
|
||
blocks in the set. Care should be taken to call df_set_blocks right
|
||
before the call to analyze in order to eliminate the possibility that
|
||
optimizations that reorder blocks invalidate the bitvector.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
DF_RESCAN_BLOCKS is an optional call that causes the scanner to be
|
||
(re)run over the set of blocks passed in. If blocks is NULL, the entire
|
||
function (or all of the blocks defined in df_set_blocks) is rescanned.
|
||
If blocks contains blocks that were not defined in the call to
|
||
df_set_blocks, these blocks are added to the set of blocks.
|
||
|
||
|
||
DF_ANALYZE causes all of the defined problems to be (re)solved. It
|
||
does not cause blocks to be (re)scanned at the rtl level unless no
|
||
prior call is made to df_rescan_blocks. When DF_ANALYZE is completes,
|
||
the IN and OUT sets for each basic block contain the computer
|
||
information. The DF_*_BB_INFO macros can be used to access these
|
||
bitvectors.
|
||
|
||
|
||
DF_DUMP can then be called to dump the information produce to some
|
||
file.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
DF_FINISH causes all of the datastructures to be cleaned up and freed.
|
||
The df_instance is also freed and its pointer should be NULLed.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Scanning produces a `struct df_ref' data structure (ref) is allocated
|
||
for every register reference (def or use) and this records the insn
|
||
and bb the ref is found within. The refs are linked together in
|
||
chains of uses and defs for each insn and for each register. Each ref
|
||
also has a chain field that links all the use refs for a def or all
|
||
the def refs for a use. This is used to create use-def or def-use
|
||
chains.
|
||
|
||
Different optimizations have different needs. Ultimately, only
|
||
register allocation and schedulers should be using the bitmaps
|
||
produced for the live register and uninitialized register problems.
|
||
The rest of the backend should be upgraded to using and maintaining
|
||
the linked information such as def use or use def chains.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
PHILOSOPHY:
|
||
|
||
While incremental bitmaps are not worthwhile to maintain, incremental
|
||
chains may be perfectly reasonable. The fastest way to build chains
|
||
from scratch or after significant modifications is to build reaching
|
||
definitions (RD) and build the chains from this.
|
||
|
||
However, general algorithms for maintaining use-def or def-use chains
|
||
are not practical. The amount of work to recompute the chain any
|
||
chain after an arbitrary change is large. However, with a modest
|
||
amount of work it is generally possible to have the application that
|
||
uses the chains keep them up to date. The high level knowledge of
|
||
what is really happening is essential to crafting efficient
|
||
incremental algorithms.
|
||
|
||
As for the bit vector problems, there is no interface to give a set of
|
||
blocks over with to resolve the iteration. In general, restarting a
|
||
dataflow iteration is difficult and expensive. Again, the best way to
|
||
keep the dataflow information up to data (if this is really what is
|
||
needed) it to formulate a problem specific solution.
|
||
|
||
There are fine grained calls for creating and deleting references from
|
||
instructions in df-scan.c. However, these are not currently connected
|
||
to the engine that resolves the dataflow equations.
|
||
|
||
|
||
DATA STRUCTURES:
|
||
|
||
The basic object is a DF_REF (reference) and this may either be a
|
||
DEF (definition) or a USE of a register.
|
||
|
||
These are linked into a variety of lists; namely reg-def, reg-use,
|
||
insn-def, insn-use, def-use, and use-def lists. For example, the
|
||
reg-def lists contain all the locations that define a given register
|
||
while the insn-use lists contain all the locations that use a
|
||
register.
|
||
|
||
Note that the reg-def and reg-use chains are generally short for
|
||
pseudos and long for the hard registers.
|
||
|
||
ACCESSING REFS:
|
||
|
||
There are 4 ways to obtain access to refs:
|
||
|
||
1) References are divided into two categories, REAL and ARTIFICIAL.
|
||
|
||
REAL refs are associated with instructions. They are linked into
|
||
either in the insn's defs list (accessed by the DF_INSN_DEFS or
|
||
DF_INSN_UID_DEFS macros) or the insn's uses list (accessed by the
|
||
DF_INSN_USES or DF_INSN_UID_USES macros). These macros produce a
|
||
ref (or NULL), the rest of the list can be obtained by traversal of
|
||
the NEXT_REF field (accessed by the DF_REF_NEXT_REF macro.) There
|
||
is no significance to the ordering of the uses or refs in an
|
||
instruction.
|
||
|
||
ARTIFICIAL refs are associated with basic blocks. The heads of
|
||
these lists can be accessed by calling get_artificial_defs or
|
||
get_artificial_uses for the particular basic block. Artificial
|
||
defs and uses are only there if DF_HARD_REGS was specified when the
|
||
df instance was created.
|
||
|
||
Artificial defs and uses occur both at the beginning and ends of blocks.
|
||
|
||
For blocks that area at the destination of eh edges, the
|
||
artificial uses and defs occur at the beginning. The defs relate
|
||
to the registers specified in EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO and the uses
|
||
relate to the registers specified in ED_USES. Logically these
|
||
defs and uses should really occur along the eh edge, but there is
|
||
no convenient way to do this. Artificial edges that occur at the
|
||
beginning of the block have the DF_REF_AT_TOP flag set.
|
||
|
||
Artificial uses occur at the end of all blocks. These arise from
|
||
the hard registers that are always live, such as the stack
|
||
register and are put there to keep the code from forgetting about
|
||
them.
|
||
|
||
Artificial defs occur at the end of the entry block. These arise
|
||
from registers that are live at entry to the function.
|
||
|
||
2) All of the uses and defs associated with each pseudo or hard
|
||
register are linked in a bidirectional chain. These are called
|
||
reg-use or reg_def chains.
|
||
|
||
The first use (or def) for a register can be obtained using the
|
||
DF_REG_USE_GET macro (or DF_REG_DEF_GET macro). Subsequent uses
|
||
for the same regno can be obtained by following the next_reg field
|
||
of the ref.
|
||
|
||
In previous versions of this code, these chains were ordered. It
|
||
has not been practical to continue this practice.
|
||
|
||
3) If def-use or use-def chains are built, these can be traversed to
|
||
get to other refs.
|
||
|
||
4) An array of all of the uses (and an array of all of the defs) can
|
||
be built. These arrays are indexed by the value in the id
|
||
structure. These arrays are only lazily kept up to date, and that
|
||
process can be expensive. To have these arrays built, call
|
||
df_reorganize_refs. Note that the values in the id field of a ref
|
||
may change across calls to df_analyze or df_reorganize refs.
|
||
|
||
If the only use of this array is to find all of the refs, it is
|
||
better to traverse all of the registers and then traverse all of
|
||
reg-use or reg-def chains.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
NOTES:
|
||
|
||
Embedded addressing side-effects, such as POST_INC or PRE_INC, generate
|
||
both a use and a def. These are both marked read/write to show that they
|
||
are dependent. For example, (set (reg 40) (mem (post_inc (reg 42))))
|
||
will generate a use of reg 42 followed by a def of reg 42 (both marked
|
||
read/write). Similarly, (set (reg 40) (mem (pre_dec (reg 41))))
|
||
generates a use of reg 41 then a def of reg 41 (both marked read/write),
|
||
even though reg 41 is decremented before it is used for the memory
|
||
address in this second example.
|
||
|
||
A set to a REG inside a ZERO_EXTRACT, or a set to a non-paradoxical SUBREG
|
||
for which the number of word_mode units covered by the outer mode is
|
||
smaller than that covered by the inner mode, invokes a read-modify-write.
|
||
operation. We generate both a use and a def and again mark them
|
||
read/write.
|
||
|
||
Paradoxical subreg writes do not leave a trace of the old content, so they
|
||
are write-only operations.
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
|
||
#include "config.h"
|
||
#include "system.h"
|
||
#include "coretypes.h"
|
||
#include "tm.h"
|
||
#include "rtl.h"
|
||
#include "tm_p.h"
|
||
#include "insn-config.h"
|
||
#include "recog.h"
|
||
#include "function.h"
|
||
#include "regs.h"
|
||
#include "output.h"
|
||
#include "alloc-pool.h"
|
||
#include "flags.h"
|
||
#include "hard-reg-set.h"
|
||
#include "basic-block.h"
|
||
#include "sbitmap.h"
|
||
#include "bitmap.h"
|
||
#include "timevar.h"
|
||
#include "df.h"
|
||
#include "tree-pass.h"
|
||
|
||
static struct df *ddf = NULL;
|
||
struct df *shared_df = NULL;
|
||
|
||
static void *df_get_bb_info (struct dataflow *, unsigned int);
|
||
static void df_set_bb_info (struct dataflow *, unsigned int, void *);
|
||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Functions to create, destroy and manipulate an instance of df.
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Initialize dataflow analysis and allocate and initialize dataflow
|
||
memory. */
|
||
|
||
struct df *
|
||
df_init (int flags)
|
||
{
|
||
struct df *df = XCNEW (struct df);
|
||
|
||
/* This is executed once per compilation to initialize platform
|
||
specific data structures. */
|
||
df_hard_reg_init ();
|
||
|
||
/* All df instance must define the scanning problem. */
|
||
df_scan_add_problem (df, flags);
|
||
ddf = df;
|
||
return df;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* Add PROBLEM to the DF instance. */
|
||
|
||
struct dataflow *
|
||
df_add_problem (struct df *df, struct df_problem *problem, int flags)
|
||
{
|
||
struct dataflow *dflow;
|
||
|
||
/* First try to add the dependent problem. */
|
||
if (problem->dependent_problem_fun)
|
||
(problem->dependent_problem_fun) (df, 0);
|
||
|
||
/* Check to see if this problem has already been defined. If it
|
||
has, just return that instance, if not, add it to the end of the
|
||
vector. */
|
||
dflow = df->problems_by_index[problem->id];
|
||
if (dflow)
|
||
return dflow;
|
||
|
||
/* Make a new one and add it to the end. */
|
||
dflow = XCNEW (struct dataflow);
|
||
dflow->flags = flags;
|
||
dflow->df = df;
|
||
dflow->problem = problem;
|
||
df->problems_in_order[df->num_problems_defined++] = dflow;
|
||
df->problems_by_index[dflow->problem->id] = dflow;
|
||
|
||
return dflow;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Set the MASK flags in the DFLOW problem. The old flags are
|
||
returned. If a flag is not allowed to be changed this will fail if
|
||
checking is enabled. */
|
||
int
|
||
df_set_flags (struct dataflow *dflow, int mask)
|
||
{
|
||
int old_flags = dflow->flags;
|
||
|
||
gcc_assert (!(mask & (~dflow->problem->changeable_flags)));
|
||
|
||
dflow->flags |= mask;
|
||
|
||
return old_flags;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* Clear the MASK flags in the DFLOW problem. The old flags are
|
||
returned. If a flag is not allowed to be changed this will fail if
|
||
checking is enabled. */
|
||
int
|
||
df_clear_flags (struct dataflow *dflow, int mask)
|
||
{
|
||
int old_flags = dflow->flags;
|
||
|
||
gcc_assert (!(mask & (~dflow->problem->changeable_flags)));
|
||
|
||
dflow->flags &= !mask;
|
||
|
||
return old_flags;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* Set the blocks that are to be considered for analysis. If this is
|
||
not called or is called with null, the entire function in
|
||
analyzed. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_set_blocks (struct df *df, bitmap blocks)
|
||
{
|
||
if (blocks)
|
||
{
|
||
if (df->blocks_to_analyze)
|
||
{
|
||
int p;
|
||
bitmap diff = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
|
||
bitmap_and_compl (diff, df->blocks_to_analyze, blocks);
|
||
for (p = df->num_problems_defined - 1; p >= 0 ;p--)
|
||
{
|
||
struct dataflow *dflow = df->problems_in_order[p];
|
||
if (dflow->problem->reset_fun)
|
||
dflow->problem->reset_fun (dflow, df->blocks_to_analyze);
|
||
else if (dflow->problem->free_bb_fun)
|
||
{
|
||
bitmap_iterator bi;
|
||
unsigned int bb_index;
|
||
|
||
EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (diff, 0, bb_index, bi)
|
||
{
|
||
basic_block bb = BASIC_BLOCK (bb_index);
|
||
if (bb)
|
||
{
|
||
dflow->problem->free_bb_fun
|
||
(dflow, bb, df_get_bb_info (dflow, bb_index));
|
||
df_set_bb_info (dflow, bb_index, NULL);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
BITMAP_FREE (diff);
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
/* If we have not actually run scanning before, do not try
|
||
to clear anything. */
|
||
struct dataflow *scan_dflow = df->problems_by_index [DF_SCAN];
|
||
if (scan_dflow->problem_data)
|
||
{
|
||
bitmap blocks_to_reset = NULL;
|
||
int p;
|
||
for (p = df->num_problems_defined - 1; p >= 0 ;p--)
|
||
{
|
||
struct dataflow *dflow = df->problems_in_order[p];
|
||
if (dflow->problem->reset_fun)
|
||
{
|
||
if (!blocks_to_reset)
|
||
{
|
||
basic_block bb;
|
||
blocks_to_reset = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
|
||
FOR_ALL_BB(bb)
|
||
{
|
||
bitmap_set_bit (blocks_to_reset, bb->index);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
dflow->problem->reset_fun (dflow, blocks_to_reset);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if (blocks_to_reset)
|
||
BITMAP_FREE (blocks_to_reset);
|
||
}
|
||
df->blocks_to_analyze = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
|
||
}
|
||
bitmap_copy (df->blocks_to_analyze, blocks);
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
if (df->blocks_to_analyze)
|
||
{
|
||
BITMAP_FREE (df->blocks_to_analyze);
|
||
df->blocks_to_analyze = NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Free all of the per basic block dataflow from all of the problems.
|
||
This is typically called before a basic block is deleted and the
|
||
problem will be reanalyzed. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_delete_basic_block (struct df *df, int bb_index)
|
||
{
|
||
basic_block bb = BASIC_BLOCK (bb_index);
|
||
int i;
|
||
|
||
for (i = 0; i < df->num_problems_defined; i++)
|
||
{
|
||
struct dataflow *dflow = df->problems_in_order[i];
|
||
if (dflow->problem->free_bb_fun)
|
||
dflow->problem->free_bb_fun
|
||
(dflow, bb, df_get_bb_info (dflow, bb_index));
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Free all the dataflow info and the DF structure. This should be
|
||
called from the df_finish macro which also NULLs the parm. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_finish1 (struct df *df)
|
||
{
|
||
int i;
|
||
|
||
for (i = 0; i < df->num_problems_defined; i++)
|
||
df->problems_in_order[i]->problem->free_fun (df->problems_in_order[i]);
|
||
|
||
free (df);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
The general data flow analysis engine.
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Hybrid search algorithm from "Implementation Techniques for
|
||
Efficient Data-Flow Analysis of Large Programs". */
|
||
|
||
static void
|
||
df_hybrid_search_forward (basic_block bb,
|
||
struct dataflow *dataflow,
|
||
bool single_pass)
|
||
{
|
||
int result_changed;
|
||
int i = bb->index;
|
||
edge e;
|
||
edge_iterator ei;
|
||
|
||
SET_BIT (dataflow->visited, bb->index);
|
||
gcc_assert (TEST_BIT (dataflow->pending, bb->index));
|
||
RESET_BIT (dataflow->pending, i);
|
||
|
||
/* Calculate <conf_op> of predecessor_outs. */
|
||
if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->preds) > 0)
|
||
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
|
||
{
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->considered, e->src->index))
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
dataflow->problem->con_fun_n (dataflow, e);
|
||
}
|
||
else if (dataflow->problem->con_fun_0)
|
||
dataflow->problem->con_fun_0 (dataflow, bb);
|
||
|
||
result_changed = dataflow->problem->trans_fun (dataflow, i);
|
||
|
||
if (!result_changed || single_pass)
|
||
return;
|
||
|
||
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
|
||
{
|
||
if (e->dest->index == i)
|
||
continue;
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->considered, e->dest->index))
|
||
continue;
|
||
SET_BIT (dataflow->pending, e->dest->index);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
|
||
{
|
||
if (e->dest->index == i)
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->considered, e->dest->index))
|
||
continue;
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->visited, e->dest->index))
|
||
df_hybrid_search_forward (e->dest, dataflow, single_pass);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void
|
||
df_hybrid_search_backward (basic_block bb,
|
||
struct dataflow *dataflow,
|
||
bool single_pass)
|
||
{
|
||
int result_changed;
|
||
int i = bb->index;
|
||
edge e;
|
||
edge_iterator ei;
|
||
|
||
SET_BIT (dataflow->visited, bb->index);
|
||
gcc_assert (TEST_BIT (dataflow->pending, bb->index));
|
||
RESET_BIT (dataflow->pending, i);
|
||
|
||
/* Calculate <conf_op> of predecessor_outs. */
|
||
if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->succs) > 0)
|
||
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
|
||
{
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->considered, e->dest->index))
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
dataflow->problem->con_fun_n (dataflow, e);
|
||
}
|
||
else if (dataflow->problem->con_fun_0)
|
||
dataflow->problem->con_fun_0 (dataflow, bb);
|
||
|
||
result_changed = dataflow->problem->trans_fun (dataflow, i);
|
||
|
||
if (!result_changed || single_pass)
|
||
return;
|
||
|
||
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
|
||
{
|
||
if (e->src->index == i)
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->considered, e->src->index))
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
SET_BIT (dataflow->pending, e->src->index);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
|
||
{
|
||
if (e->src->index == i)
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->considered, e->src->index))
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
if (!TEST_BIT (dataflow->visited, e->src->index))
|
||
df_hybrid_search_backward (e->src, dataflow, single_pass);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* This function will perform iterative bitvector dataflow described
|
||
by DATAFLOW, producing the in and out sets. Only the part of the
|
||
cfg induced by blocks in DATAFLOW->order is taken into account.
|
||
|
||
SINGLE_PASS is true if you just want to make one pass over the
|
||
blocks. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_iterative_dataflow (struct dataflow *dataflow,
|
||
bitmap blocks_to_consider, bitmap blocks_to_init,
|
||
int *blocks_in_postorder, int n_blocks,
|
||
bool single_pass)
|
||
{
|
||
unsigned int idx;
|
||
int i;
|
||
sbitmap visited = sbitmap_alloc (last_basic_block);
|
||
sbitmap pending = sbitmap_alloc (last_basic_block);
|
||
sbitmap considered = sbitmap_alloc (last_basic_block);
|
||
bitmap_iterator bi;
|
||
|
||
dataflow->visited = visited;
|
||
dataflow->pending = pending;
|
||
dataflow->considered = considered;
|
||
|
||
sbitmap_zero (visited);
|
||
sbitmap_zero (pending);
|
||
sbitmap_zero (considered);
|
||
|
||
gcc_assert (dataflow->problem->dir);
|
||
|
||
EXECUTE_IF_SET_IN_BITMAP (blocks_to_consider, 0, idx, bi)
|
||
{
|
||
SET_BIT (considered, idx);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
for (i = 0; i < n_blocks; i++)
|
||
{
|
||
idx = blocks_in_postorder[i];
|
||
SET_BIT (pending, idx);
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
dataflow->problem->init_fun (dataflow, blocks_to_init);
|
||
|
||
while (1)
|
||
{
|
||
|
||
/* For forward problems, you want to pass in reverse postorder
|
||
and for backward problems you want postorder. This has been
|
||
shown to be as good as you can do by several people, the
|
||
first being Mathew Hecht in his phd dissertation.
|
||
|
||
The nodes are passed into this function in postorder. */
|
||
|
||
if (dataflow->problem->dir == DF_FORWARD)
|
||
{
|
||
for (i = n_blocks - 1 ; i >= 0 ; i--)
|
||
{
|
||
idx = blocks_in_postorder[i];
|
||
|
||
if (TEST_BIT (pending, idx) && !TEST_BIT (visited, idx))
|
||
df_hybrid_search_forward (BASIC_BLOCK (idx), dataflow, single_pass);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
for (i = 0; i < n_blocks; i++)
|
||
{
|
||
idx = blocks_in_postorder[i];
|
||
|
||
if (TEST_BIT (pending, idx) && !TEST_BIT (visited, idx))
|
||
df_hybrid_search_backward (BASIC_BLOCK (idx), dataflow, single_pass);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (sbitmap_first_set_bit (pending) == -1)
|
||
break;
|
||
|
||
sbitmap_zero (visited);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
sbitmap_free (pending);
|
||
sbitmap_free (visited);
|
||
sbitmap_free (considered);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Remove the entries not in BLOCKS from the LIST of length LEN, preserving
|
||
the order of the remaining entries. Returns the length of the resulting
|
||
list. */
|
||
|
||
static unsigned
|
||
df_prune_to_subcfg (int list[], unsigned len, bitmap blocks)
|
||
{
|
||
unsigned act, last;
|
||
|
||
for (act = 0, last = 0; act < len; act++)
|
||
if (bitmap_bit_p (blocks, list[act]))
|
||
list[last++] = list[act];
|
||
|
||
return last;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Execute dataflow analysis on a single dataflow problem.
|
||
|
||
There are three sets of blocks passed in:
|
||
|
||
BLOCKS_TO_CONSIDER are the blocks whose solution can either be
|
||
examined or will be computed. For calls from DF_ANALYZE, this is
|
||
the set of blocks that has been passed to DF_SET_BLOCKS. For calls
|
||
from DF_ANALYZE_SIMPLE_CHANGE_SOME_BLOCKS, this is the set of
|
||
blocks in the fringe (the set of blocks passed in plus the set of
|
||
immed preds and succs of those blocks).
|
||
|
||
BLOCKS_TO_INIT are the blocks whose solution will be changed by
|
||
this iteration. For calls from DF_ANALYZE, this is the set of
|
||
blocks that has been passed to DF_SET_BLOCKS. For calls from
|
||
DF_ANALYZE_SIMPLE_CHANGE_SOME_BLOCKS, this is the set of blocks
|
||
passed in.
|
||
|
||
BLOCKS_TO_SCAN are the set of blocks that need to be rescanned.
|
||
For calls from DF_ANALYZE, this is the accumulated set of blocks
|
||
that has been passed to DF_RESCAN_BLOCKS since the last call to
|
||
DF_ANALYZE. For calls from DF_ANALYZE_SIMPLE_CHANGE_SOME_BLOCKS,
|
||
this is the set of blocks passed in.
|
||
|
||
blocks_to_consider blocks_to_init blocks_to_scan
|
||
full redo all all all
|
||
partial redo all all sub
|
||
small fixup fringe sub sub
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_analyze_problem (struct dataflow *dflow,
|
||
bitmap blocks_to_consider,
|
||
bitmap blocks_to_init,
|
||
bitmap blocks_to_scan,
|
||
int *postorder, int n_blocks, bool single_pass)
|
||
{
|
||
/* (Re)Allocate the datastructures necessary to solve the problem. */
|
||
if (dflow->problem->alloc_fun)
|
||
dflow->problem->alloc_fun (dflow, blocks_to_scan, blocks_to_init);
|
||
|
||
/* Set up the problem and compute the local information. This
|
||
function is passed both the blocks_to_consider and the
|
||
blocks_to_scan because the RD and RU problems require the entire
|
||
function to be rescanned if they are going to be updated. */
|
||
if (dflow->problem->local_compute_fun)
|
||
dflow->problem->local_compute_fun (dflow, blocks_to_consider, blocks_to_scan);
|
||
|
||
/* Solve the equations. */
|
||
if (dflow->problem->dataflow_fun)
|
||
dflow->problem->dataflow_fun (dflow, blocks_to_consider, blocks_to_init,
|
||
postorder, n_blocks, single_pass);
|
||
|
||
/* Massage the solution. */
|
||
if (dflow->problem->finalize_fun)
|
||
dflow->problem->finalize_fun (dflow, blocks_to_consider);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Analyze dataflow info for the basic blocks specified by the bitmap
|
||
BLOCKS, or for the whole CFG if BLOCKS is zero. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_analyze (struct df *df)
|
||
{
|
||
int *postorder = XNEWVEC (int, last_basic_block);
|
||
bitmap current_all_blocks = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
|
||
int n_blocks;
|
||
int i;
|
||
bool everything;
|
||
|
||
n_blocks = post_order_compute (postorder, true);
|
||
|
||
if (n_blocks != n_basic_blocks)
|
||
delete_unreachable_blocks ();
|
||
|
||
for (i = 0; i < n_blocks; i++)
|
||
bitmap_set_bit (current_all_blocks, postorder[i]);
|
||
|
||
/* No one called df_rescan_blocks, so do it. */
|
||
if (!df->blocks_to_scan)
|
||
df_rescan_blocks (df, NULL);
|
||
|
||
/* Make sure that we have pruned any unreachable blocks from these
|
||
sets. */
|
||
bitmap_and_into (df->blocks_to_scan, current_all_blocks);
|
||
|
||
if (df->blocks_to_analyze)
|
||
{
|
||
everything = false;
|
||
bitmap_and_into (df->blocks_to_analyze, current_all_blocks);
|
||
n_blocks = df_prune_to_subcfg (postorder, n_blocks, df->blocks_to_analyze);
|
||
BITMAP_FREE (current_all_blocks);
|
||
}
|
||
else
|
||
{
|
||
everything = true;
|
||
df->blocks_to_analyze = current_all_blocks;
|
||
current_all_blocks = NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* Skip over the DF_SCAN problem. */
|
||
for (i = 1; i < df->num_problems_defined; i++)
|
||
df_analyze_problem (df->problems_in_order[i],
|
||
df->blocks_to_analyze, df->blocks_to_analyze,
|
||
df->blocks_to_scan,
|
||
postorder, n_blocks, false);
|
||
|
||
if (everything)
|
||
{
|
||
BITMAP_FREE (df->blocks_to_analyze);
|
||
df->blocks_to_analyze = NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
BITMAP_FREE (df->blocks_to_scan);
|
||
df->blocks_to_scan = NULL;
|
||
free (postorder);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Functions to support limited incremental change.
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Get basic block info. */
|
||
|
||
static void *
|
||
df_get_bb_info (struct dataflow *dflow, unsigned int index)
|
||
{
|
||
return (struct df_scan_bb_info *) dflow->block_info[index];
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Set basic block info. */
|
||
|
||
static void
|
||
df_set_bb_info (struct dataflow *dflow, unsigned int index,
|
||
void *bb_info)
|
||
{
|
||
dflow->block_info[index] = bb_info;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Called from the rtl_compact_blocks to reorganize the problems basic
|
||
block info. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_compact_blocks (struct df *df)
|
||
{
|
||
int i, p;
|
||
basic_block bb;
|
||
void **problem_temps;
|
||
int size = last_basic_block *sizeof (void *);
|
||
problem_temps = xmalloc (size);
|
||
|
||
for (p = 0; p < df->num_problems_defined; p++)
|
||
{
|
||
struct dataflow *dflow = df->problems_in_order[p];
|
||
if (dflow->problem->free_bb_fun)
|
||
{
|
||
df_grow_bb_info (dflow);
|
||
memcpy (problem_temps, dflow->block_info, size);
|
||
|
||
/* Copy the bb info from the problem tmps to the proper
|
||
place in the block_info vector. Null out the copied
|
||
item. */
|
||
i = NUM_FIXED_BLOCKS;
|
||
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
|
||
{
|
||
df_set_bb_info (dflow, i, problem_temps[bb->index]);
|
||
problem_temps[bb->index] = NULL;
|
||
i++;
|
||
}
|
||
memset (dflow->block_info + i, 0,
|
||
(last_basic_block - i) *sizeof (void *));
|
||
|
||
/* Free any block infos that were not copied (and NULLed).
|
||
These are from orphaned blocks. */
|
||
for (i = NUM_FIXED_BLOCKS; i < last_basic_block; i++)
|
||
{
|
||
basic_block bb = BASIC_BLOCK (i);
|
||
if (problem_temps[i] && bb)
|
||
dflow->problem->free_bb_fun
|
||
(dflow, bb, problem_temps[i]);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
free (problem_temps);
|
||
|
||
i = NUM_FIXED_BLOCKS;
|
||
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
|
||
{
|
||
SET_BASIC_BLOCK (i, bb);
|
||
bb->index = i;
|
||
i++;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
gcc_assert (i == n_basic_blocks);
|
||
|
||
for (; i < last_basic_block; i++)
|
||
SET_BASIC_BLOCK (i, NULL);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Shove NEW_BLOCK in at OLD_INDEX. Called from if-cvt to hack a
|
||
block. There is no excuse for people to do this kind of thing. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_bb_replace (struct df *df, int old_index, basic_block new_block)
|
||
{
|
||
int p;
|
||
|
||
for (p = 0; p < df->num_problems_defined; p++)
|
||
{
|
||
struct dataflow *dflow = df->problems_in_order[p];
|
||
if (dflow->block_info)
|
||
{
|
||
void *temp;
|
||
|
||
df_grow_bb_info (dflow);
|
||
|
||
/* The old switcheroo. */
|
||
|
||
temp = df_get_bb_info (dflow, old_index);
|
||
df_set_bb_info (dflow, old_index,
|
||
df_get_bb_info (dflow, new_block->index));
|
||
df_set_bb_info (dflow, new_block->index, temp);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
SET_BASIC_BLOCK (old_index, new_block);
|
||
new_block->index = old_index;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
PUBLIC INTERFACES TO QUERY INFORMATION.
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Return last use of REGNO within BB. */
|
||
|
||
struct df_ref *
|
||
df_bb_regno_last_use_find (struct df *df, basic_block bb, unsigned int regno)
|
||
{
|
||
rtx insn;
|
||
struct df_ref *use;
|
||
unsigned int uid;
|
||
|
||
FOR_BB_INSNS_REVERSE (bb, insn)
|
||
{
|
||
if (!INSN_P (insn))
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
uid = INSN_UID (insn);
|
||
for (use = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->uses; use; use = use->next_ref)
|
||
if (DF_REF_REGNO (use) == regno)
|
||
return use;
|
||
}
|
||
return NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Return first def of REGNO within BB. */
|
||
|
||
struct df_ref *
|
||
df_bb_regno_first_def_find (struct df *df, basic_block bb, unsigned int regno)
|
||
{
|
||
rtx insn;
|
||
struct df_ref *def;
|
||
unsigned int uid;
|
||
|
||
FOR_BB_INSNS (bb, insn)
|
||
{
|
||
if (!INSN_P (insn))
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
uid = INSN_UID (insn);
|
||
for (def = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->defs; def; def = def->next_ref)
|
||
if (DF_REF_REGNO (def) == regno)
|
||
return def;
|
||
}
|
||
return NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Return last def of REGNO within BB. */
|
||
|
||
struct df_ref *
|
||
df_bb_regno_last_def_find (struct df *df, basic_block bb, unsigned int regno)
|
||
{
|
||
rtx insn;
|
||
struct df_ref *def;
|
||
unsigned int uid;
|
||
|
||
FOR_BB_INSNS_REVERSE (bb, insn)
|
||
{
|
||
if (!INSN_P (insn))
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
uid = INSN_UID (insn);
|
||
for (def = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->defs; def; def = def->next_ref)
|
||
if (DF_REF_REGNO (def) == regno)
|
||
return def;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
return NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* Return true if INSN defines REGNO. */
|
||
|
||
bool
|
||
df_insn_regno_def_p (struct df *df, rtx insn, unsigned int regno)
|
||
{
|
||
unsigned int uid;
|
||
struct df_ref *def;
|
||
|
||
uid = INSN_UID (insn);
|
||
for (def = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->defs; def; def = def->next_ref)
|
||
if (DF_REF_REGNO (def) == regno)
|
||
return true;
|
||
|
||
return false;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Finds the reference corresponding to the definition of REG in INSN.
|
||
DF is the dataflow object. */
|
||
|
||
struct df_ref *
|
||
df_find_def (struct df *df, rtx insn, rtx reg)
|
||
{
|
||
unsigned int uid;
|
||
struct df_ref *def;
|
||
|
||
if (GET_CODE (reg) == SUBREG)
|
||
reg = SUBREG_REG (reg);
|
||
gcc_assert (REG_P (reg));
|
||
|
||
uid = INSN_UID (insn);
|
||
for (def = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->defs; def; def = def->next_ref)
|
||
if (rtx_equal_p (DF_REF_REAL_REG (def), reg))
|
||
return def;
|
||
|
||
return NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Return true if REG is defined in INSN, zero otherwise. */
|
||
|
||
bool
|
||
df_reg_defined (struct df *df, rtx insn, rtx reg)
|
||
{
|
||
return df_find_def (df, insn, reg) != NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Finds the reference corresponding to the use of REG in INSN.
|
||
DF is the dataflow object. */
|
||
|
||
struct df_ref *
|
||
df_find_use (struct df *df, rtx insn, rtx reg)
|
||
{
|
||
unsigned int uid;
|
||
struct df_ref *use;
|
||
|
||
if (GET_CODE (reg) == SUBREG)
|
||
reg = SUBREG_REG (reg);
|
||
gcc_assert (REG_P (reg));
|
||
|
||
uid = INSN_UID (insn);
|
||
for (use = DF_INSN_UID_GET (df, uid)->uses; use; use = use->next_ref)
|
||
if (rtx_equal_p (DF_REF_REAL_REG (use), reg))
|
||
return use;
|
||
|
||
return NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Return true if REG is referenced in INSN, zero otherwise. */
|
||
|
||
bool
|
||
df_reg_used (struct df *df, rtx insn, rtx reg)
|
||
{
|
||
return df_find_use (df, insn, reg) != NULL;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
Debugging and printing functions.
|
||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||
|
||
/* Dump dataflow info. */
|
||
void
|
||
df_dump (struct df *df, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
int i;
|
||
|
||
if (!df || !file)
|
||
return;
|
||
|
||
fprintf (file, "\n\n%s\n", current_function_name ());
|
||
fprintf (file, "\nDataflow summary:\n");
|
||
fprintf (file, "def_info->bitmap_size = %d, use_info->bitmap_size = %d\n",
|
||
df->def_info.bitmap_size, df->use_info.bitmap_size);
|
||
|
||
for (i = 0; i < df->num_problems_defined; i++)
|
||
df->problems_in_order[i]->problem->dump_fun (df->problems_in_order[i], file);
|
||
|
||
fprintf (file, "\n");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_refs_chain_dump (struct df_ref *ref, bool follow_chain, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, "{ ");
|
||
while (ref)
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, "%c%d(%d) ",
|
||
DF_REF_REG_DEF_P (ref) ? 'd' : 'u',
|
||
DF_REF_ID (ref),
|
||
DF_REF_REGNO (ref));
|
||
if (follow_chain)
|
||
df_chain_dump (DF_REF_CHAIN (ref), file);
|
||
ref = ref->next_ref;
|
||
}
|
||
fprintf (file, "}");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* Dump either a ref-def or reg-use chain. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_regs_chain_dump (struct df *df ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, struct df_ref *ref, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, "{ ");
|
||
while (ref)
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, "%c%d(%d) ",
|
||
DF_REF_REG_DEF_P (ref) ? 'd' : 'u',
|
||
DF_REF_ID (ref),
|
||
DF_REF_REGNO (ref));
|
||
ref = ref->next_reg;
|
||
}
|
||
fprintf (file, "}");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
static void
|
||
df_mws_dump (struct df_mw_hardreg *mws, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
while (mws)
|
||
{
|
||
struct df_link *regs = mws->regs;
|
||
fprintf (file, "%c%d(",
|
||
(mws->type == DF_REF_REG_DEF) ? 'd' : 'u',
|
||
DF_REF_REGNO (regs->ref));
|
||
while (regs)
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, "%d ", DF_REF_REGNO (regs->ref));
|
||
regs = regs->next;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fprintf (file, ") ");
|
||
mws = mws->next;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
static void
|
||
df_insn_uid_debug (struct df *df, unsigned int uid,
|
||
bool follow_chain, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
int bbi;
|
||
|
||
if (DF_INSN_UID_DEFS (df, uid))
|
||
bbi = DF_REF_BBNO (DF_INSN_UID_DEFS (df, uid));
|
||
else if (DF_INSN_UID_USES(df, uid))
|
||
bbi = DF_REF_BBNO (DF_INSN_UID_USES (df, uid));
|
||
else
|
||
bbi = -1;
|
||
|
||
fprintf (file, "insn %d bb %d luid %d",
|
||
uid, bbi, DF_INSN_UID_LUID (df, uid));
|
||
|
||
if (DF_INSN_UID_DEFS (df, uid))
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, " defs ");
|
||
df_refs_chain_dump (DF_INSN_UID_DEFS (df, uid), follow_chain, file);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (DF_INSN_UID_USES (df, uid))
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, " uses ");
|
||
df_refs_chain_dump (DF_INSN_UID_USES (df, uid), follow_chain, file);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (DF_INSN_UID_MWS (df, uid))
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, " mws ");
|
||
df_mws_dump (DF_INSN_UID_MWS (df, uid), file);
|
||
}
|
||
fprintf (file, "\n");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_insn_debug (struct df *df, rtx insn, bool follow_chain, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
df_insn_uid_debug (df, INSN_UID (insn), follow_chain, file);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_insn_debug_regno (struct df *df, rtx insn, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
unsigned int uid;
|
||
int bbi;
|
||
|
||
uid = INSN_UID (insn);
|
||
if (DF_INSN_UID_DEFS (df, uid))
|
||
bbi = DF_REF_BBNO (DF_INSN_UID_DEFS (df, uid));
|
||
else if (DF_INSN_UID_USES(df, uid))
|
||
bbi = DF_REF_BBNO (DF_INSN_UID_USES (df, uid));
|
||
else
|
||
bbi = -1;
|
||
|
||
fprintf (file, "insn %d bb %d luid %d defs ",
|
||
uid, bbi, DF_INSN_LUID (df, insn));
|
||
df_regs_chain_dump (df, DF_INSN_UID_DEFS (df, uid), file);
|
||
|
||
fprintf (file, " uses ");
|
||
df_regs_chain_dump (df, DF_INSN_UID_USES (df, uid), file);
|
||
fprintf (file, "\n");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_regno_debug (struct df *df, unsigned int regno, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, "reg %d defs ", regno);
|
||
df_regs_chain_dump (df, DF_REG_DEF_GET (df, regno)->reg_chain, file);
|
||
fprintf (file, " uses ");
|
||
df_regs_chain_dump (df, DF_REG_USE_GET (df, regno)->reg_chain, file);
|
||
fprintf (file, "\n");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
df_ref_debug (struct df_ref *ref, FILE *file)
|
||
{
|
||
fprintf (file, "%c%d ",
|
||
DF_REF_REG_DEF_P (ref) ? 'd' : 'u',
|
||
DF_REF_ID (ref));
|
||
fprintf (file, "reg %d bb %d insn %d flag %x chain ",
|
||
DF_REF_REGNO (ref),
|
||
DF_REF_BBNO (ref),
|
||
DF_REF_INSN (ref) ? INSN_UID (DF_REF_INSN (ref)) : -1,
|
||
DF_REF_FLAGS (ref));
|
||
df_chain_dump (DF_REF_CHAIN (ref), file);
|
||
fprintf (file, "\n");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* Functions for debugging from GDB. */
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
debug_df_insn (rtx insn)
|
||
{
|
||
df_insn_debug (ddf, insn, true, stderr);
|
||
debug_rtx (insn);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
debug_df_reg (rtx reg)
|
||
{
|
||
df_regno_debug (ddf, REGNO (reg), stderr);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
debug_df_regno (unsigned int regno)
|
||
{
|
||
df_regno_debug (ddf, regno, stderr);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
debug_df_ref (struct df_ref *ref)
|
||
{
|
||
df_ref_debug (ref, stderr);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
debug_df_defno (unsigned int defno)
|
||
{
|
||
df_ref_debug (DF_DEFS_GET (ddf, defno), stderr);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
debug_df_useno (unsigned int defno)
|
||
{
|
||
df_ref_debug (DF_USES_GET (ddf, defno), stderr);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void
|
||
debug_df_chain (struct df_link *link)
|
||
{
|
||
df_chain_dump (link, stderr);
|
||
fputc ('\n', stderr);
|
||
}
|