Jilles Tjoelker
ba08f69b5c
sh: Change ! within a pipeline to start a new pipeline instead.
...
This is how ksh93 treats ! within a pipeline and makes the ! in
a | ! b | c
negate the exit status of the pipeline, as if it were
a | { ! b | c; }
Side effect: something like
f() ! a
is now a syntax error, because a function definition takes a command,
not a pipeline.
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
2010-10-24 17:06:49 +00:00
..
2005-08-13 15:04:30 +00:00
2005-01-10 08:39:26 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-24 18:41:14 +00:00
2010-04-25 20:43:19 +00:00
2009-12-24 18:41:14 +00:00
2010-04-25 20:43:19 +00:00
2006-04-02 18:43:33 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2010-04-17 14:35:46 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-24 20:55:14 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-27 18:04:05 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2010-03-06 16:57:53 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-24 18:41:14 +00:00
2010-10-13 23:29:09 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-24 18:41:14 +00:00
2010-10-16 12:40:00 +00:00
2010-06-29 22:37:45 +00:00
2010-10-13 04:01:01 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-25 20:21:35 +00:00
2010-10-13 23:31:17 +00:00
2010-10-13 23:29:09 +00:00
2010-10-13 23:29:09 +00:00
2010-09-08 20:35:43 +00:00
2009-12-27 18:04:05 +00:00
2009-12-27 18:04:05 +00:00
2009-08-28 22:41:25 +00:00
2010-09-03 22:13:54 +00:00
2005-01-10 08:39:26 +00:00
2010-06-02 19:16:58 +00:00
2009-12-27 18:04:05 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2005-01-10 08:39:26 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-27 18:04:05 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2010-01-01 18:17:46 +00:00
2010-10-24 17:06:49 +00:00
2009-12-27 18:04:05 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2010-10-16 14:37:56 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-24 18:41:14 +00:00
2006-04-16 11:54:01 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2009-12-24 20:55:14 +00:00
2010-10-13 22:18:03 +00:00
2010-06-02 19:16:58 +00:00