Alan Cox d936694f09 Consider three objects, O, BO, and BBO, where BO is O's backing object
and BBO is BO's backing object.  Now, suppose that O and BO are being
collapsed.  Furthermore, suppose that BO has been marked dead
(OBJ_DEAD) by vm_object_backing_scan() and that either
vm_object_backing_scan() has been forced to sleep due to encountering
a busy page or vm_object_collapse() has been forced to sleep due to
memory allocation in the swap pager.  If vm_object_deallocate() is
then called on BBO and BO is BBO's only shadow object,
vm_object_deallocate() will collapse BO and BBO.  In doing so, it adds
a necessary temporary reference to BO.  If this collapse also sleeps
and the prior collapse resumes first, the temporary reference will
cause vm_object_collapse to panic with the message "backing_object %p
was somehow re-referenced during collapse!"

Resolve this race by changing vm_object_deallocate() such that it
doesn't collapse BO and BBO if BO is marked dead.  Once O and BO are
collapsed, vm_object_collapse() will attempt to collapse O and BBO.
So, vm_object_deallocate() on BBO need do nothing.

Reported by: Peter Holm on 20050107
URL: http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/cons102.html

In collaboration with: tegge@
Candidate for RELENG_4 and RELENG_5
MFC after: 2 weeks
2005-01-15 21:12:47 +00:00
..
2005-01-15 19:42:28 +00:00
2005-01-14 20:50:52 +00:00
2005-01-10 09:56:47 +00:00
2005-01-15 02:43:31 +00:00