d/freebsd-skq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
545d312293
freebsd-skq/sys/kern/kern_rwlock.c

1312 lines
36 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*-
* Copyright (c) 2006 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
/*
* Machine independent bits of reader/writer lock implementation.
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
#include "opt_ddb.h"
Add software PMC support. New kernel events can be added at various location for sampling or counting. This will for example allow easy system profiling whatever the processor is with known tools like pmcstat(8). Simultaneous usage of software PMC and hardware PMC is possible, for example looking at the lock acquire failure, page fault while sampling on instructions. Sponsored by: NETASQ MFC after: 1 month
2012-03-28 20:58:30 +00:00
#include "opt_hwpmc_hooks.h"
- Simplify the #ifdef's for adaptive mutexes and rwlocks by conditionally defining a macro earlier in the file. - Add NO_ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS option to disable adaptive spinning for rwlocks.
2007-03-22 16:09:23 +00:00
#include "opt_no_adaptive_rwlocks.h"
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#include <sys/param.h>
Fixup r240424: On entering KDB backends, the hijacked thread to run interrupt context can still be idlethread. At that point, without the panic condition, it can still happen that idlethread then will try to acquire some locks to carry on some operations. Skip the idlethread check on block/sleep lock operations when KDB is active. Reported by: jh Tested by: jh MFC after: 1 week
2012-12-22 09:37:34 +00:00
#include <sys/kdb.h>
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#include <sys/ktr.h>
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
#include <sys/kernel.h>
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#include <sys/lock.h>
#include <sys/mutex.h>
#include <sys/proc.h>
#include <sys/rwlock.h>
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
#include <sys/sched.h>
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
#include <sys/smp.h>
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#include <sys/systm.h>
#include <sys/turnstile.h>
Fix some problems with lock profiling in rw locks: - Adjust lock_profiling stubs semantic in the hard functions in order to be more accurate and trustable - As for sx locks, disable shared paths for lock_profiling. Actually, lock_profiling has a subtle race which makes results caming from shared paths not completely trustable. A macro stub (LOCK_PROFILING_SHARED) can be actually used for re-enabling this paths, but is currently intended for developing use only. - style(9) fixes Approved by: jeff, kmacy, jhb[1] Approved by: re [1] Had initial reservations not shared by others, conceded in the end.
2007-07-20 08:43:42 +00:00
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#include <machine/cpu.h>
- Simplify the #ifdef's for adaptive mutexes and rwlocks by conditionally defining a macro earlier in the file. - Add NO_ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS option to disable adaptive spinning for rwlocks.
2007-03-22 16:09:23 +00:00
#if defined(SMP) && !defined(NO_ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS)
#define ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
#endif
Add software PMC support. New kernel events can be added at various location for sampling or counting. This will for example allow easy system profiling whatever the processor is with known tools like pmcstat(8). Simultaneous usage of software PMC and hardware PMC is possible, for example looking at the lock acquire failure, page fault while sampling on instructions. Sponsored by: NETASQ MFC after: 1 month
2012-03-28 20:58:30 +00:00
#ifdef HWPMC_HOOKS
#include <sys/pmckern.h>
PMC_SOFT_DECLARE( , , lock, failed);
#endif
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
/*
* Return the rwlock address when the lock cookie address is provided.
* This functionality assumes that struct rwlock* have a member named rw_lock.
*/
#define rwlock2rw(c) (__containerof(c, struct rwlock, rw_lock))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#ifdef DDB
#include <ddb/ddb.h>
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
static void db_show_rwlock(const struct lock_object *lock);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#endif
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
static void assert_rw(const struct lock_object *lock, int what);
Fix lc_lock/lc_unlock() support for rmlocks held in shared mode. With current lock classes KPI it was really difficult because there was no way to pass an rmtracker object to the lock/unlock routines. In order to accomplish the task, modify the aforementioned functions so that they can return (or pass as argument) an uinptr_t, which is in the rm case used to hold a pointer to struct rm_priotracker for current thread. As an added bonus, this fixes rm_sleep() in the rm shared case, which right now can communicate priotracker structure between lc_unlock()/lc_lock(). Suggested by: jhb Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: re (delphij)
2013-09-20 23:06:21 +00:00
static void lock_rw(struct lock_object *lock, uintptr_t how);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
static int owner_rw(const struct lock_object *lock, struct thread **owner);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
Fix lc_lock/lc_unlock() support for rmlocks held in shared mode. With current lock classes KPI it was really difficult because there was no way to pass an rmtracker object to the lock/unlock routines. In order to accomplish the task, modify the aforementioned functions so that they can return (or pass as argument) an uinptr_t, which is in the rm case used to hold a pointer to struct rm_priotracker for current thread. As an added bonus, this fixes rm_sleep() in the rm shared case, which right now can communicate priotracker structure between lc_unlock()/lc_lock(). Suggested by: jhb Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: re (delphij)
2013-09-20 23:06:21 +00:00
static uintptr_t unlock_rw(struct lock_object *lock);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
struct lock_class lock_class_rw = {
Use C99-style struct member initialization for lock classes.
2007-03-09 16:04:44 +00:00
.lc_name = "rw",
.lc_flags = LC_SLEEPLOCK | LC_RECURSABLE | LC_UPGRADABLE,
Expand lock class with the "virtual" function lc_assert which will offer an unified way for all the lock primitives to express lock assertions. Currenty, lockmgrs and rmlocks don't have assertions, so just panic in that case. This will be a base for more callout improvements. Ok'ed by: jhb, jeff
2007-11-18 14:43:53 +00:00
.lc_assert = assert_rw,
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#ifdef DDB
Use C99-style struct member initialization for lock classes.
2007-03-09 16:04:44 +00:00
.lc_ddb_show = db_show_rwlock,
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#endif
Add two new function pointers 'lc_lock' and 'lc_unlock' to lock classes. These functions are intended to be used to drop a lock and then reacquire it when doing an sleep such as msleep(9). Both functions accept a 'struct lock_object *' as their first parameter. The 'lc_unlock' function returns an integer that is then passed as the second paramter to the subsequent 'lc_lock' function. This can be used to communicate state. For example, sx locks and rwlocks use this to indicate if the lock was share/read locked vs exclusive/write locked. Currently, spin mutexes and lockmgr locks do not provide working lc_lock and lc_unlock functions.
2007-03-09 16:27:11 +00:00
.lc_lock = lock_rw,
.lc_unlock = unlock_rw,
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
.lc_owner = owner_rw,
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
};
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
static int rowner_retries = 10;
static int rowner_loops = 10000;
static SYSCTL_NODE(_debug, OID_AUTO, rwlock, CTLFLAG_RD, NULL,
"rwlock debugging");
SYSCTL_INT(_debug_rwlock, OID_AUTO, retry, CTLFLAG_RW, &rowner_retries, 0, "");
SYSCTL_INT(_debug_rwlock, OID_AUTO, loops, CTLFLAG_RW, &rowner_loops, 0, "");
static struct lock_delay_config rw_delay = {
.initial = 1000,
.step = 500,
.min = 100,
.max = 5000,
};
SYSCTL_INT(_debug_rwlock, OID_AUTO, delay_initial, CTLFLAG_RW, &rw_delay.initial,
0, "");
SYSCTL_INT(_debug_rwlock, OID_AUTO, delay_step, CTLFLAG_RW, &rw_delay.step,
0, "");
SYSCTL_INT(_debug_rwlock, OID_AUTO, delay_min, CTLFLAG_RW, &rw_delay.min,
0, "");
SYSCTL_INT(_debug_rwlock, OID_AUTO, delay_max, CTLFLAG_RW, &rw_delay.max,
0, "");
static void
rw_delay_sysinit(void *dummy)
{
rw_delay.initial = mp_ncpus * 25;
rw_delay.step = (mp_ncpus * 25) / 2;
rw_delay.min = mp_ncpus * 5;
rw_delay.max = mp_ncpus * 25 * 10;
}
LOCK_DELAY_SYSINIT(rw_delay_sysinit);
#endif
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
/*
* Return a pointer to the owning thread if the lock is write-locked or
* NULL if the lock is unlocked or read-locked.
*/
#define rw_wowner(rw) \
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
((rw)->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_READ ? NULL : \
(struct thread *)RW_OWNER((rw)->rw_lock))
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
/*
* Returns if a write owner is recursed. Write ownership is not assured
* here and should be previously checked.
*/
#define rw_recursed(rw) ((rw)->rw_recurse != 0)
/*
* Return true if curthread helds the lock.
*/
#define rw_wlocked(rw) (rw_wowner((rw)) == curthread)
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
/*
* Return a pointer to the owning thread for this lock who should receive
* any priority lent by threads that block on this lock. Currently this
* is identical to rw_wowner().
*/
#define rw_owner(rw) rw_wowner(rw)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#ifndef INVARIANTS
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
#define __rw_assert(c, what, file, line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#endif
Expand lock class with the "virtual" function lc_assert which will offer an unified way for all the lock primitives to express lock assertions. Currenty, lockmgrs and rmlocks don't have assertions, so just panic in that case. This will be a base for more callout improvements. Ok'ed by: jhb, jeff
2007-11-18 14:43:53 +00:00
void
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
assert_rw(const struct lock_object *lock, int what)
Expand lock class with the "virtual" function lc_assert which will offer an unified way for all the lock primitives to express lock assertions. Currenty, lockmgrs and rmlocks don't have assertions, so just panic in that case. This will be a base for more callout improvements. Ok'ed by: jhb, jeff
2007-11-18 14:43:53 +00:00
{
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
rw_assert((const struct rwlock *)lock, what);
Expand lock class with the "virtual" function lc_assert which will offer an unified way for all the lock primitives to express lock assertions. Currenty, lockmgrs and rmlocks don't have assertions, so just panic in that case. This will be a base for more callout improvements. Ok'ed by: jhb, jeff
2007-11-18 14:43:53 +00:00
}
Add two new function pointers 'lc_lock' and 'lc_unlock' to lock classes. These functions are intended to be used to drop a lock and then reacquire it when doing an sleep such as msleep(9). Both functions accept a 'struct lock_object *' as their first parameter. The 'lc_unlock' function returns an integer that is then passed as the second paramter to the subsequent 'lc_lock' function. This can be used to communicate state. For example, sx locks and rwlocks use this to indicate if the lock was share/read locked vs exclusive/write locked. Currently, spin mutexes and lockmgr locks do not provide working lc_lock and lc_unlock functions.
2007-03-09 16:27:11 +00:00
void
Fix lc_lock/lc_unlock() support for rmlocks held in shared mode. With current lock classes KPI it was really difficult because there was no way to pass an rmtracker object to the lock/unlock routines. In order to accomplish the task, modify the aforementioned functions so that they can return (or pass as argument) an uinptr_t, which is in the rm case used to hold a pointer to struct rm_priotracker for current thread. As an added bonus, this fixes rm_sleep() in the rm shared case, which right now can communicate priotracker structure between lc_unlock()/lc_lock(). Suggested by: jhb Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: re (delphij)
2013-09-20 23:06:21 +00:00
lock_rw(struct lock_object *lock, uintptr_t how)
Add two new function pointers 'lc_lock' and 'lc_unlock' to lock classes. These functions are intended to be used to drop a lock and then reacquire it when doing an sleep such as msleep(9). Both functions accept a 'struct lock_object *' as their first parameter. The 'lc_unlock' function returns an integer that is then passed as the second paramter to the subsequent 'lc_lock' function. This can be used to communicate state. For example, sx locks and rwlocks use this to indicate if the lock was share/read locked vs exclusive/write locked. Currently, spin mutexes and lockmgr locks do not provide working lc_lock and lc_unlock functions.
2007-03-09 16:27:11 +00:00
{
struct rwlock *rw;
rw = (struct rwlock *)lock;
if (how)
rw_rlock(rw);
Consistently use the same value to indicate exclusively-held and shared-held locks for all the primitives in lc_lock/lc_unlock routines. This fixes the problems introduced in r255747, which indeed introduced an inversion in the logic. Reported by: many Tested by: bdrewery, pho, lme, Adam McDougall, O. Hartmann Approved by: re (glebius)
2013-09-22 14:09:07 +00:00
else
rw_wlock(rw);
Add two new function pointers 'lc_lock' and 'lc_unlock' to lock classes. These functions are intended to be used to drop a lock and then reacquire it when doing an sleep such as msleep(9). Both functions accept a 'struct lock_object *' as their first parameter. The 'lc_unlock' function returns an integer that is then passed as the second paramter to the subsequent 'lc_lock' function. This can be used to communicate state. For example, sx locks and rwlocks use this to indicate if the lock was share/read locked vs exclusive/write locked. Currently, spin mutexes and lockmgr locks do not provide working lc_lock and lc_unlock functions.
2007-03-09 16:27:11 +00:00
}
Fix lc_lock/lc_unlock() support for rmlocks held in shared mode. With current lock classes KPI it was really difficult because there was no way to pass an rmtracker object to the lock/unlock routines. In order to accomplish the task, modify the aforementioned functions so that they can return (or pass as argument) an uinptr_t, which is in the rm case used to hold a pointer to struct rm_priotracker for current thread. As an added bonus, this fixes rm_sleep() in the rm shared case, which right now can communicate priotracker structure between lc_unlock()/lc_lock(). Suggested by: jhb Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: re (delphij)
2013-09-20 23:06:21 +00:00
uintptr_t
Add two new function pointers 'lc_lock' and 'lc_unlock' to lock classes. These functions are intended to be used to drop a lock and then reacquire it when doing an sleep such as msleep(9). Both functions accept a 'struct lock_object *' as their first parameter. The 'lc_unlock' function returns an integer that is then passed as the second paramter to the subsequent 'lc_lock' function. This can be used to communicate state. For example, sx locks and rwlocks use this to indicate if the lock was share/read locked vs exclusive/write locked. Currently, spin mutexes and lockmgr locks do not provide working lc_lock and lc_unlock functions.
2007-03-09 16:27:11 +00:00
unlock_rw(struct lock_object *lock)
{
struct rwlock *rw;
rw = (struct rwlock *)lock;
rw_assert(rw, RA_LOCKED | LA_NOTRECURSED);
if (rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_READ) {
rw_runlock(rw);
Consistently use the same value to indicate exclusively-held and shared-held locks for all the primitives in lc_lock/lc_unlock routines. This fixes the problems introduced in r255747, which indeed introduced an inversion in the logic. Reported by: many Tested by: bdrewery, pho, lme, Adam McDougall, O. Hartmann Approved by: re (glebius)
2013-09-22 14:09:07 +00:00
return (1);
Add two new function pointers 'lc_lock' and 'lc_unlock' to lock classes. These functions are intended to be used to drop a lock and then reacquire it when doing an sleep such as msleep(9). Both functions accept a 'struct lock_object *' as their first parameter. The 'lc_unlock' function returns an integer that is then passed as the second paramter to the subsequent 'lc_lock' function. This can be used to communicate state. For example, sx locks and rwlocks use this to indicate if the lock was share/read locked vs exclusive/write locked. Currently, spin mutexes and lockmgr locks do not provide working lc_lock and lc_unlock functions.
2007-03-09 16:27:11 +00:00
} else {
rw_wunlock(rw);
Consistently use the same value to indicate exclusively-held and shared-held locks for all the primitives in lc_lock/lc_unlock routines. This fixes the problems introduced in r255747, which indeed introduced an inversion in the logic. Reported by: many Tested by: bdrewery, pho, lme, Adam McDougall, O. Hartmann Approved by: re (glebius)
2013-09-22 14:09:07 +00:00
return (0);
Add two new function pointers 'lc_lock' and 'lc_unlock' to lock classes. These functions are intended to be used to drop a lock and then reacquire it when doing an sleep such as msleep(9). Both functions accept a 'struct lock_object *' as their first parameter. The 'lc_unlock' function returns an integer that is then passed as the second paramter to the subsequent 'lc_lock' function. This can be used to communicate state. For example, sx locks and rwlocks use this to indicate if the lock was share/read locked vs exclusive/write locked. Currently, spin mutexes and lockmgr locks do not provide working lc_lock and lc_unlock functions.
2007-03-09 16:27:11 +00:00
}
}
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
int
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
owner_rw(const struct lock_object *lock, struct thread **owner)
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
{
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
const struct rwlock *rw = (const struct rwlock *)lock;
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
uintptr_t x = rw->rw_lock;
*owner = rw_wowner(rw);
return ((x & RW_LOCK_READ) != 0 ? (RW_READERS(x) != 0) :
(*owner != NULL));
}
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
_rw_init_flags(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *name, int opts)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
int flags;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
MPASS((opts & ~(RW_DUPOK | RW_NOPROFILE | RW_NOWITNESS | RW_QUIET |
Add _NEW flag to mtx(9), sx(9), rmlock(9) and rwlock(9). A _NEW flag passed to _init_flags() to avoid check for double-init. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1208 Reviewed by: jhb, wblock MFC after: 1 Month
2014-12-13 21:00:10 +00:00
RW_RECURSE | RW_NEW)) == 0);
* Change the scope of the ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD() from a generic check to a pointer-fetching specific operation check. Consequently, rename the operation ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD_PTR(). * Fix the implementation of ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD_PTR() by checking directly alignment on the word boundry, for all the given specific architectures. That's a bit too strict for some common case, but it assures safety. * Add a comment explaining the scope of the macro * Add a new stub in the lockmgr specific implementation Tested by: marcel (initial version), marius Reviewed by: rwatson, jhb (comment specific review) Approved by: re (kib)
2009-08-17 16:17:21 +00:00
ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD_PTR(rw->rw_lock,
("%s: rw_lock not aligned for %s: %p", __func__, name,
&rw->rw_lock));
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
Handle lock recursion differenty by always checking against LO_RECURSABLE instead the lock own flag itself. Tested by: pho
2009-06-02 13:03:35 +00:00
flags = LO_UPGRADABLE;
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (opts & RW_DUPOK)
flags |= LO_DUPOK;
if (opts & RW_NOPROFILE)
flags |= LO_NOPROFILE;
if (!(opts & RW_NOWITNESS))
flags |= LO_WITNESS;
Handle lock recursion differenty by always checking against LO_RECURSABLE instead the lock own flag itself. Tested by: pho
2009-06-02 13:03:35 +00:00
if (opts & RW_RECURSE)
flags |= LO_RECURSABLE;
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (opts & RW_QUIET)
flags |= LO_QUIET;
Add _NEW flag to mtx(9), sx(9), rmlock(9) and rwlock(9). A _NEW flag passed to _init_flags() to avoid check for double-init. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1208 Reviewed by: jhb, wblock MFC after: 1 Month
2014-12-13 21:00:10 +00:00
if (opts & RW_NEW)
flags |= LO_NEW;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
A few mostly cosmetic nits to aid in debugging: - Call lock_init() first before setting any lock_object fields in lock init routines. This way if the machine panics due to a duplicate init the lock's original state is preserved. - Somewhat similarly, don't decrement td_locks and td_slocks until after an unlock operation has completed successfully.
2013-06-25 20:23:08 +00:00
lock_init(&rw->lock_object, &lock_class_rw, name, NULL, flags);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
rw->rw_lock = RW_UNLOCKED;
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
rw->rw_recurse = 0;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
_rw_destroy(volatile uintptr_t *c)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
Print the pointer to the lock with the panic message. The previous panic: rw lock not unlocked was not really helpful for debugging. Now one can at least call show lock <ptr> form ddb to learn more about the lock. MFC after: 3 days
2010-03-24 19:21:26 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock == RW_UNLOCKED, ("rw lock %p not unlocked", rw));
KASSERT(rw->rw_recurse == 0, ("rw lock %p still recursed", rw));
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
rw->rw_lock = RW_DESTROYED;
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
lock_destroy(&rw->lock_object);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
void
rw_sysinit(void *arg)
{
struct rw_args *args = arg;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw_init((struct rwlock *)args->ra_rw, args->ra_desc);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
add RW_SYSINIT_FLAGS macro and rw_sysinit_flags initialization function
2008-12-08 21:46:55 +00:00
void
rw_sysinit_flags(void *arg)
{
struct rw_args_flags *args = arg;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw_init_flags((struct rwlock *)args->ra_rw, args->ra_desc,
args->ra_flags);
add RW_SYSINIT_FLAGS macro and rw_sysinit_flags initialization function
2008-12-08 21:46:55 +00:00
}
Add rw_wowned() interface to rwlock(9), allowing a kernel thread to determine if it holds an exclusive rwlock reference or not. This is non-ideal, but recursion scenarios in the network stack currently require it. Approved by: jhb
2007-02-26 19:05:13 +00:00
int
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
_rw_wowned(const volatile uintptr_t *c)
Add rw_wowned() interface to rwlock(9), allowing a kernel thread to determine if it holds an exclusive rwlock reference or not. This is non-ideal, but recursion scenarios in the network stack currently require it. Approved by: jhb
2007-02-26 19:05:13 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
return (rw_wowner(rwlock2rw(c)) == curthread);
Add rw_wowned() interface to rwlock(9), allowing a kernel thread to determine if it holds an exclusive rwlock reference or not. This is non-ideal, but recursion scenarios in the network stack currently require it. Approved by: jhb
2007-02-26 19:05:13 +00:00
}
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
_rw_wlock_cookie(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Fixup r240424: On entering KDB backends, the hijacked thread to run interrupt context can still be idlethread. At that point, without the panic condition, it can still happen that idlethread then will try to acquire some locks to carry on some operations. Skip the idlethread check on block/sleep lock operations when KDB is active. Reported by: jh Tested by: jh MFC after: 1 week
2012-12-22 09:37:34 +00:00
KASSERT(kdb_active != 0 || !TD_IS_IDLETHREAD(curthread),
Improve check coverage about idle threads. Idle threads are not allowed to acquire any lock but spinlocks. Deny any attempt to do so by panicing at the locking operation when INVARIANTS is on. Then, remove the check on blocking on a turnstile. The check in sleepqueues is left because they are not allowed to use tsleep() either which could happen still. Reviewed by: bde, jhb, kib MFC after: 1 week
2012-09-12 22:10:53 +00:00
("rw_wlock() by idle thread %p on rwlock %s @ %s:%d",
curthread, rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line));
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_wlock() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
WITNESS_CHECKORDER(&rw->lock_object, LOP_NEWORDER | LOP_EXCLUSIVE, file,
Teach WITNESS about the interlocks used with lockmgr. This removes a bunch of spurious witness warnings since lockmgr grew witness support. Before this, every time you passed an interlock to a lockmgr lock WITNESS treated it as a LOR. Reviewed by: attilio
2008-09-10 19:13:30 +00:00
line, NULL);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
__rw_wlock(rw, curthread, file, line);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
LOCK_LOG_LOCK("WLOCK", &rw->lock_object, 0, rw->rw_recurse, file, line);
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
WITNESS_LOCK(&rw->lock_object, LOP_EXCLUSIVE, file, line);
Don't modify curthread->td_locks unless INVARIANTS is enabled. This field is only used in a KASSERT that verifies that no locks are held when returning to user mode. Moreover, the td_locks accounting is only correct when LOCK_DEBUG > 0, which is implied by INVARIANTS. Reviewed by: jhb MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3205
2015-08-02 00:03:08 +00:00
TD_LOCKS_INC(curthread);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
int
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_try_wlock(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
int rval;
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return (1);
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Fixup r240424: On entering KDB backends, the hijacked thread to run interrupt context can still be idlethread. At that point, without the panic condition, it can still happen that idlethread then will try to acquire some locks to carry on some operations. Skip the idlethread check on block/sleep lock operations when KDB is active. Reported by: jh Tested by: jh MFC after: 1 week
2012-12-22 09:37:34 +00:00
KASSERT(kdb_active != 0 || !TD_IS_IDLETHREAD(curthread),
Improve check coverage about idle threads. Idle threads are not allowed to acquire any lock but spinlocks. Deny any attempt to do so by panicing at the locking operation when INVARIANTS is on. Then, remove the check on blocking on a turnstile. The check in sleepqueues is left because they are not allowed to use tsleep() either which could happen still. Reviewed by: bde, jhb, kib MFC after: 1 week
2012-09-12 22:10:53 +00:00
("rw_try_wlock() by idle thread %p on rwlock %s @ %s:%d",
curthread, rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line));
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_try_wlock() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
Handle lock recursion differenty by always checking against LO_RECURSABLE instead the lock own flag itself. Tested by: pho
2009-06-02 13:03:35 +00:00
if (rw_wlocked(rw) &&
(rw->lock_object.lo_flags & LO_RECURSABLE) != 0) {
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
rw->rw_recurse++;
rval = 1;
} else
rval = atomic_cmpset_acq_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, RW_UNLOCKED,
(uintptr_t)curthread);
LOCK_LOG_TRY("WLOCK", &rw->lock_object, 0, rval, file, line);
if (rval) {
WITNESS_LOCK(&rw->lock_object, LOP_EXCLUSIVE | LOP_TRYLOCK,
file, line);
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
if (!rw_recursed(rw))
Consistently use a reader/writer flag for lockstat probes in rwlock(9) and sx(9), rather than using the probe function name to determine whether a given lock is a read lock or a write lock. Update lockstat(1) accordingly.
2015-07-19 22:24:33 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_PROFILE_OBTAIN_RWLOCK_SUCCESS(rw__acquire,
rw, 0, 0, file, line, LOCKSTAT_WRITER);
Don't modify curthread->td_locks unless INVARIANTS is enabled. This field is only used in a KASSERT that verifies that no locks are held when returning to user mode. Moreover, the td_locks accounting is only correct when LOCK_DEBUG > 0, which is implied by INVARIANTS. Reviewed by: jhb MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3205
2015-08-02 00:03:08 +00:00
TD_LOCKS_INC(curthread);
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
}
return (rval);
}
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
_rw_wunlock_cookie(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_wunlock() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_assert(c, RA_WLOCKED, file, line);
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
WITNESS_UNLOCK(&rw->lock_object, LOP_EXCLUSIVE, file, line);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
LOCK_LOG_LOCK("WUNLOCK", &rw->lock_object, 0, rw->rw_recurse, file,
line);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
__rw_wunlock(rw, curthread, file, line);
Don't modify curthread->td_locks unless INVARIANTS is enabled. This field is only used in a KASSERT that verifies that no locks are held when returning to user mode. Moreover, the td_locks accounting is only correct when LOCK_DEBUG > 0, which is implied by INVARIANTS. Reviewed by: jhb MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3205
2015-08-02 00:03:08 +00:00
TD_LOCKS_DEC(curthread);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
Don't modify curthread->td_locks unless INVARIANTS is enabled. This field is only used in a KASSERT that verifies that no locks are held when returning to user mode. Moreover, the td_locks accounting is only correct when LOCK_DEBUG > 0, which is implied by INVARIANTS. Reviewed by: jhb MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3205
2015-08-02 00:03:08 +00:00
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
/*
* Determines whether a new reader can acquire a lock. Succeeds if the
* reader already owns a read lock and the lock is locked for read to
* prevent deadlock from reader recursion. Also succeeds if the lock
* is unlocked and has no writer waiters or spinners. Failing otherwise
* prioritizes writers before readers.
*/
#define RW_CAN_READ(_rw) \
((curthread->td_rw_rlocks && (_rw) & RW_LOCK_READ) || ((_rw) & \
(RW_LOCK_READ | RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS | RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER)) == \
RW_LOCK_READ)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_rlock(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
struct turnstile *ts;
- Simplify the #ifdef's for adaptive mutexes and rwlocks by conditionally defining a macro earlier in the file. - Add NO_ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS option to disable adaptive spinning for rwlocks.
2007-03-22 16:09:23 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
Adaptively spin before blocking on the turnstile if an rwlock is write locked. In general the adaptive spinning is similar to the same code for mutexes with some extra trickiness in rw_wunlock_hard(). Specifically, even though both wait bits might be set and we might have a turnstile with at least one waiting thread, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we are not waking up (they might all be spinning), and we should only preserve the waiting flag for the queue we aren't waking up if there are in fact threads blocked on that queue. Secondly, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we have chosen to waken threads from (there might only be threads blocked on the other queue and the threads for this queue are all spinning) in which case we disown the turnstile instead of doing a braodcast and unpend.
2006-04-18 18:27:54 +00:00
volatile struct thread *owner;
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
int spintries = 0;
int i;
'owner' is not used without SMP. Fix kernel build for such kernel configurations. Approved by: jhb
2006-04-18 20:32:42 +00:00
#endif
- Wrap lock profiling state variables in #ifdef LOCK_PROFILING blocks.
2009-03-15 08:03:54 +00:00
#ifdef LOCK_PROFILING
Fix some nits in lock profiling for rwlocks: - Properly note when a read lock is released. - Always note when we contest on a read lock. - Only note success of obtaining read locks for the first reader to match the behavior of sx(9). Reviewed by: kmacy
2007-03-07 20:48:48 +00:00
uint64_t waittime = 0;
Further improvements to LOCK_PROFILING: - Fix missing initialization in kern_rwlock.c causing bogus times to be collected - Move updates to the lock hash to after the lock is released for spin mutexes, sleep mutexes, and sx locks - Add new kernel build option LOCK_PROFILE_FAST - only update lock profiling statistics when an acquisition is contended. This reduces the overhead of LOCK_PROFILING to increasing system time by 20%-25% which on "make -j8 kernel-toolchain" on a dual woodcrest is unmeasurable in terms of wall-clock time. Contrast this to enabling lock profiling without LOCK_PROFILE_FAST and I see a 5x-6x slowdown in wall-clock time.
2007-02-27 06:42:05 +00:00
int contested = 0;
- Wrap lock profiling state variables in #ifdef LOCK_PROFILING blocks.
2009-03-15 08:03:54 +00:00
#endif
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
uintptr_t v;
locks: fix up ifdef guards introduced in r303643 Both sx and rwlocks had copy-pasted ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES instead of the correct define. MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-02 00:15:08 +00:00
#if defined(ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS) || defined(KDTRACE_HOOKS)
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
struct lock_delay_arg lda;
#endif
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
uintptr_t state;
locks: change sleep_cnt and spin_cnt types to u_int Both variables are uint64_t, but they only count spins or sleeps. All reasonable values which we can get here comfortably hit in 32-bit range. Suggested by: kib MFC after: 1 week
2016-07-31 12:11:55 +00:00
u_int sleep_cnt = 0;
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
int64_t sleep_time = 0;
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
int64_t all_time = 0;
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return;
locks: fix compilation for KDTRACE_HOOKS && !ADAPTIVE_* case Reported by: Michael Butler <imb protected-networks.net>
2016-08-02 03:05:59 +00:00
#if defined(ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS)
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
lock_delay_arg_init(&lda, &rw_delay);
locks: fix compilation for KDTRACE_HOOKS && !ADAPTIVE_* case Reported by: Michael Butler <imb protected-networks.net>
2016-08-02 03:05:59 +00:00
#elif defined(KDTRACE_HOOKS)
lock_delay_arg_init(&lda, NULL);
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
#endif
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Fixup r240424: On entering KDB backends, the hijacked thread to run interrupt context can still be idlethread. At that point, without the panic condition, it can still happen that idlethread then will try to acquire some locks to carry on some operations. Skip the idlethread check on block/sleep lock operations when KDB is active. Reported by: jh Tested by: jh MFC after: 1 week
2012-12-22 09:37:34 +00:00
KASSERT(kdb_active != 0 || !TD_IS_IDLETHREAD(curthread),
Improve check coverage about idle threads. Idle threads are not allowed to acquire any lock but spinlocks. Deny any attempt to do so by panicing at the locking operation when INVARIANTS is on. Then, remove the check on blocking on a turnstile. The check in sleepqueues is left because they are not allowed to use tsleep() either which could happen still. Reviewed by: bde, jhb, kib MFC after: 1 week
2012-09-12 22:10:53 +00:00
("rw_rlock() by idle thread %p on rwlock %s @ %s:%d",
curthread, rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line));
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_rlock() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
KASSERT(rw_wowner(rw) != curthread,
- Handle the recursed/not recursed flags with RA_RLOCKED in rw_assert(). - Tweak a panic message.
2013-06-03 17:38:57 +00:00
("rw_rlock: wlock already held for %s @ %s:%d",
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line));
Teach WITNESS about the interlocks used with lockmgr. This removes a bunch of spurious witness warnings since lockmgr grew witness support. Before this, every time you passed an interlock to a lockmgr lock WITNESS treated it as a LOR. Reviewed by: attilio
2008-09-10 19:13:30 +00:00
WITNESS_CHECKORDER(&rw->lock_object, LOP_NEWORDER, file, line, NULL);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
all_time -= lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
state = rw->rw_lock;
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
for (;;) {
/*
* Handle the easy case. If no other thread has a write
* lock, then try to bump up the count of read locks. Note
* that we have to preserve the current state of the
* RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS flag. If we fail to acquire a
* read lock, then rw_lock must have changed, so restart
* the loop. Note that this handles the case of a
* completely unlocked rwlock since such a lock is encoded
* as a read lock with no waiters.
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
v = rw->rw_lock;
if (RW_CAN_READ(v)) {
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
* The RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS flag should only be set
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
* if the lock has been unlocked and write waiters
* were present.
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if (atomic_cmpset_acq_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v,
v + RW_ONE_READER)) {
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR4(KTR_LOCK,
"%s: %p succeed %p -> %p", __func__,
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
rw, (void *)v,
(void *)(v + RW_ONE_READER));
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
break;
}
continue;
}
Don't increment the spin count until after the first attempt to acquire a rwlock read lock. Otherwise the lockstat:::rw-spin probe will fire spuriously. MFC after: 1 week
2015-07-19 22:26:02 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
lda.spin_cnt++;
Don't increment the spin count until after the first attempt to acquire a rwlock read lock. Otherwise the lockstat:::rw-spin probe will fire spuriously. MFC after: 1 week
2015-07-19 22:26:02 +00:00
#endif
Add software PMC support. New kernel events can be added at various location for sampling or counting. This will for example allow easy system profiling whatever the processor is with known tools like pmcstat(8). Simultaneous usage of software PMC and hardware PMC is possible, for example looking at the lock acquire failure, page fault while sampling on instructions. Sponsored by: NETASQ MFC after: 1 month
2012-03-28 20:58:30 +00:00
#ifdef HWPMC_HOOKS
PMC_SOFT_CALL( , , lock, failed);
#endif
- Re-implement lock profiling in such a way that it no longer breaks the ABI when enabled. There is no longer an embedded lock_profile_object in each lock. Instead a list of lock_profile_objects is kept per-thread for each lock it may own. The cnt_hold statistic is now always 0 to facilitate this. - Support shared locking by tracking individual lock instances and statistics in the per-thread per-instance lock_profile_object. - Make the lock profiling hash table a per-cpu singly linked list with a per-cpu static lock_prof allocator. This removes the need for an array of spinlocks and reduces cache contention between cores. - Use a seperate hash for spinlocks and other locks so that only a critical_enter() is required and not a spinlock_enter() to modify the per-cpu tables. - Count time spent spinning in the lock statistics. - Remove the LOCK_PROFILE_SHARED option as it is always supported now. - Specifically drop and release the scheduler locks in both schedulers since we track owners now. In collaboration with: Kip Macy Sponsored by: Nokia
2007-12-15 23:13:31 +00:00
lock_profile_obtain_lock_failed(&rw->lock_object,
&contested, &waittime);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
/*
* If the owner is running on another CPU, spin until
* the owner stops running or the state of the lock
* changes.
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if ((v & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0) {
owner = (struct thread *)RW_OWNER(v);
if (TD_IS_RUNNING(owner)) {
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
CTR3(KTR_LOCK,
"%s: spinning on %p held by %p",
__func__, rw, owner);
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE1(KTR_SCHED, "thread",
sched_tdname(curthread), "spinning",
"lockname:\"%s\"", rw->lock_object.lo_name);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
while ((struct thread*)RW_OWNER(rw->rw_lock) ==
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
owner && TD_IS_RUNNING(owner))
lock_delay(&lda);
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE0(KTR_SCHED, "thread",
sched_tdname(curthread), "running");
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
continue;
}
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
} else if (spintries < rowner_retries) {
spintries++;
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE1(KTR_SCHED, "thread", sched_tdname(curthread),
"spinning", "lockname:\"%s\"",
rw->lock_object.lo_name);
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < rowner_loops; i++) {
v = rw->rw_lock;
if ((v & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0 || RW_CAN_READ(v))
break;
cpu_spinwait();
}
- Assert for not leaking readers rw locks counter on userland return. - Use a correct spin_cnt for KDTRACE_HOOK case in rw read lock. Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon storage division
2013-12-17 13:37:02 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
lda.spin_cnt += rowner_loops - i;
- Assert for not leaking readers rw locks counter on userland return. - Use a correct spin_cnt for KDTRACE_HOOK case in rw read lock. Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon storage division
2013-12-17 13:37:02 +00:00
#endif
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE0(KTR_SCHED, "thread", sched_tdname(curthread),
"running");
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
if (i != rowner_loops)
continue;
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
}
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
* Okay, now it's the hard case. Some other thread already
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
* has a write lock or there are write waiters present,
* acquire the turnstile lock so we can begin the process
* of blocking.
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
*/
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
ts = turnstile_trywait(&rw->lock_object);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
* The lock might have been released while we spun, so
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
* recheck its state and restart the loop if needed.
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
v = rw->rw_lock;
if (RW_CAN_READ(v)) {
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_cancel(ts);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
continue;
}
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
/*
Tweak a few comments on adaptive spinning.
2009-05-29 13:56:34 +00:00
* The current lock owner might have started executing
* on another CPU (or the lock could have changed
* owners) while we were waiting on the turnstile
* chain lock. If so, drop the turnstile lock and try
* again.
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if ((v & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0) {
owner = (struct thread *)RW_OWNER(v);
if (TD_IS_RUNNING(owner)) {
turnstile_cancel(ts);
continue;
}
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
}
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
* The lock is held in write mode or it already has waiters.
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
MPASS(!RW_CAN_READ(v));
/*
* If the RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS flag is already set, then
* we can go ahead and block. If it is not set then try
* to set it. If we fail to set it drop the turnstile
* lock and restart the loop.
*/
if (!(v & RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS)) {
if (!atomic_cmpset_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v,
v | RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS)) {
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_cancel(ts);
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
continue;
}
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p set read waiters flag",
__func__, rw);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
/*
* We were unable to acquire the lock and the read waiters
* flag is set, so we must block on the turnstile.
*/
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p blocking on turnstile", __func__,
rw);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
sleep_time -= lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_wait(ts, rw_owner(rw), TS_SHARED_QUEUE);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
sleep_time += lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
sleep_cnt++;
#endif
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p resuming from turnstile",
__func__, rw);
}
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
all_time += lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
if (sleep_time)
Implement the lockstat provider using SDT(9) instead of the custom provider in lockstat.ko. This means that lockstat probes now have typed arguments and will utilize SDT probe hot-patching support when it arrives. Reviewed by: gnn Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2993
2015-07-19 22:14:09 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_RECORD4(rw__block, rw, sleep_time,
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_READER, (state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0,
(state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0 ? 0 : RW_READERS(state));
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
/* Record only the loops spinning and not sleeping. */
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
if (lda.spin_cnt > sleep_cnt)
Implement the lockstat provider using SDT(9) instead of the custom provider in lockstat.ko. This means that lockstat probes now have typed arguments and will utilize SDT probe hot-patching support when it arrives. Reviewed by: gnn Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2993
2015-07-19 22:14:09 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_RECORD4(rw__spin, rw, all_time - sleep_time,
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_READER, (state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0,
(state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0 ? 0 : RW_READERS(state));
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
* TODO: acquire "owner of record" here. Here be turnstile dragons
* however. turnstiles don't like owners changing between calls to
* turnstile_wait() currently.
*/
Consistently use a reader/writer flag for lockstat probes in rwlock(9) and sx(9), rather than using the probe function name to determine whether a given lock is a read lock or a write lock. Update lockstat(1) accordingly.
2015-07-19 22:24:33 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_PROFILE_OBTAIN_RWLOCK_SUCCESS(rw__acquire, rw, contested,
waittime, file, line, LOCKSTAT_READER);
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
LOCK_LOG_LOCK("RLOCK", &rw->lock_object, 0, 0, file, line);
WITNESS_LOCK(&rw->lock_object, 0, file, line);
Don't modify curthread->td_locks unless INVARIANTS is enabled. This field is only used in a KASSERT that verifies that no locks are held when returning to user mode. Moreover, the td_locks accounting is only correct when LOCK_DEBUG > 0, which is implied by INVARIANTS. Reviewed by: jhb MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3205
2015-08-02 00:03:08 +00:00
TD_LOCKS_INC(curthread);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
curthread->td_rw_rlocks++;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
int
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_try_rlock(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
uintptr_t x;
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return (1);
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Fixup r240424: On entering KDB backends, the hijacked thread to run interrupt context can still be idlethread. At that point, without the panic condition, it can still happen that idlethread then will try to acquire some locks to carry on some operations. Skip the idlethread check on block/sleep lock operations when KDB is active. Reported by: jh Tested by: jh MFC after: 1 week
2012-12-22 09:37:34 +00:00
KASSERT(kdb_active != 0 || !TD_IS_IDLETHREAD(curthread),
Improve check coverage about idle threads. Idle threads are not allowed to acquire any lock but spinlocks. Deny any attempt to do so by panicing at the locking operation when INVARIANTS is on. Then, remove the check on blocking on a turnstile. The check in sleepqueues is left because they are not allowed to use tsleep() either which could happen still. Reviewed by: bde, jhb, kib MFC after: 1 week
2012-09-12 22:10:53 +00:00
("rw_try_rlock() by idle thread %p on rwlock %s @ %s:%d",
curthread, rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line));
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
for (;;) {
x = rw->rw_lock;
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_try_rlock() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
if (!(x & RW_LOCK_READ))
break;
if (atomic_cmpset_acq_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, x, x + RW_ONE_READER)) {
LOCK_LOG_TRY("RLOCK", &rw->lock_object, 0, 1, file,
line);
WITNESS_LOCK(&rw->lock_object, LOP_TRYLOCK, file, line);
Consistently use a reader/writer flag for lockstat probes in rwlock(9) and sx(9), rather than using the probe function name to determine whether a given lock is a read lock or a write lock. Update lockstat(1) accordingly.
2015-07-19 22:24:33 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_PROFILE_OBTAIN_RWLOCK_SUCCESS(rw__acquire,
rw, 0, 0, file, line, LOCKSTAT_READER);
Don't modify curthread->td_locks unless INVARIANTS is enabled. This field is only used in a KASSERT that verifies that no locks are held when returning to user mode. Moreover, the td_locks accounting is only correct when LOCK_DEBUG > 0, which is implied by INVARIANTS. Reviewed by: jhb MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3205
2015-08-02 00:03:08 +00:00
TD_LOCKS_INC(curthread);
Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise. The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and manpage updating will happen soon. Requested by: jeff, kris
2008-04-01 20:31:55 +00:00
curthread->td_rw_rlocks++;
return (1);
}
}
LOCK_LOG_TRY("RLOCK", &rw->lock_object, 0, 0, file, line);
return (0);
}
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
_rw_runlock_cookie(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
struct turnstile *ts;
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
uintptr_t x, v, queue;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_runlock() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_assert(c, RA_RLOCKED, file, line);
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
WITNESS_UNLOCK(&rw->lock_object, 0, file, line);
LOCK_LOG_LOCK("RUNLOCK", &rw->lock_object, 0, 0, file, line);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/* TODO: drop "owner of record" here. */
for (;;) {
/*
* See if there is more than one read lock held. If so,
* just drop one and return.
*/
x = rw->rw_lock;
if (RW_READERS(x) > 1) {
When releasing a read/shared lock we need to use a write memory barrier in order to avoid, on architectures which doesn't have strong ordered writes, CPU instructions reordering. Diagnosed by: fabio Reviewed by: jhb Tested by: Giovanni Trematerra <giovanni dot trematerra at gmail dot com>
2009-09-30 13:26:31 +00:00
if (atomic_cmpset_rel_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, x,
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
x - RW_ONE_READER)) {
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR4(KTR_LOCK,
"%s: %p succeeded %p -> %p",
__func__, rw, (void *)x,
(void *)(x - RW_ONE_READER));
break;
}
continue;
Fix some nits in lock profiling for rwlocks: - Properly note when a read lock is released. - Always note when we contest on a read lock. - Only note success of obtaining read locks for the first reader to match the behavior of sx(9). Reviewed by: kmacy
2007-03-07 20:48:48 +00:00
}
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
* If there aren't any waiters for a write lock, then try
* to drop it quickly.
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if (!(x & RW_LOCK_WAITERS)) {
MPASS((x & ~RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER) ==
RW_READERS_LOCK(1));
When releasing a read/shared lock we need to use a write memory barrier in order to avoid, on architectures which doesn't have strong ordered writes, CPU instructions reordering. Diagnosed by: fabio Reviewed by: jhb Tested by: Giovanni Trematerra <giovanni dot trematerra at gmail dot com>
2009-09-30 13:26:31 +00:00
if (atomic_cmpset_rel_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, x,
RW_UNLOCKED)) {
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p last succeeded",
__func__, rw);
break;
}
continue;
}
/*
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
* Ok, we know we have waiters and we think we are the
* last reader, so grab the turnstile lock.
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
*/
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_chain_lock(&rw->lock_object);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
v = rw->rw_lock & (RW_LOCK_WAITERS | RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER);
MPASS(v & RW_LOCK_WAITERS);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
* Try to drop our lock leaving the lock in a unlocked
* state.
*
* If you wanted to do explicit lock handoff you'd have to
* do it here. You'd also want to use turnstile_signal()
* and you'd have to handle the race where a higher
* priority thread blocks on the write lock before the
* thread you wakeup actually runs and have the new thread
* "steal" the lock. For now it's a lot simpler to just
* wakeup all of the waiters.
*
* As above, if we fail, then another thread might have
* acquired a read lock, so drop the turnstile lock and
* restart.
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
x = RW_UNLOCKED;
if (v & RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS) {
queue = TS_EXCLUSIVE_QUEUE;
x |= (v & RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS);
} else
queue = TS_SHARED_QUEUE;
When releasing a read/shared lock we need to use a write memory barrier in order to avoid, on architectures which doesn't have strong ordered writes, CPU instructions reordering. Diagnosed by: fabio Reviewed by: jhb Tested by: Giovanni Trematerra <giovanni dot trematerra at gmail dot com>
2009-09-30 13:26:31 +00:00
if (!atomic_cmpset_rel_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, RW_READERS_LOCK(1) | v,
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
x)) {
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_chain_unlock(&rw->lock_object);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
continue;
}
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p last succeeded with waiters",
__func__, rw);
/*
* Ok. The lock is released and all that's left is to
* wake up the waiters. Note that the lock might not be
* free anymore, but in that case the writers will just
* block again if they run before the new lock holder(s)
* release the lock.
*/
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
ts = turnstile_lookup(&rw->lock_object);
Adaptively spin before blocking on the turnstile if an rwlock is write locked. In general the adaptive spinning is similar to the same code for mutexes with some extra trickiness in rw_wunlock_hard(). Specifically, even though both wait bits might be set and we might have a turnstile with at least one waiting thread, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we are not waking up (they might all be spinning), and we should only preserve the waiting flag for the queue we aren't waking up if there are in fact threads blocked on that queue. Secondly, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we have chosen to waken threads from (there might only be threads blocked on the other queue and the threads for this queue are all spinning) in which case we disown the turnstile instead of doing a braodcast and unpend.
2006-04-18 18:27:54 +00:00
MPASS(ts != NULL);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
turnstile_broadcast(ts, queue);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
turnstile_unpend(ts, TS_SHARED_LOCK);
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_chain_unlock(&rw->lock_object);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
break;
}
Consistently use a reader/writer flag for lockstat probes in rwlock(9) and sx(9), rather than using the probe function name to determine whether a given lock is a read lock or a write lock. Update lockstat(1) accordingly.
2015-07-19 22:24:33 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_PROFILE_RELEASE_RWLOCK(rw__release, rw, LOCKSTAT_READER);
Don't modify curthread->td_locks unless INVARIANTS is enabled. This field is only used in a KASSERT that verifies that no locks are held when returning to user mode. Moreover, the td_locks accounting is only correct when LOCK_DEBUG > 0, which is implied by INVARIANTS. Reviewed by: jhb MFC after: 1 week Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3205
2015-08-02 00:03:08 +00:00
TD_LOCKS_DEC(curthread);
A few mostly cosmetic nits to aid in debugging: - Call lock_init() first before setting any lock_object fields in lock init routines. This way if the machine panics due to a duplicate init the lock's original state is preserved. - Somewhat similarly, don't decrement td_locks and td_slocks until after an unlock operation has completed successfully.
2013-06-25 20:23:08 +00:00
curthread->td_rw_rlocks--;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
/*
* This function is called when we are unable to obtain a write lock on the
* first try. This means that at least one other thread holds either a
* read or write lock.
*/
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_wlock_hard(volatile uintptr_t *c, uintptr_t tid, const char *file,
int line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
struct turnstile *ts;
- Simplify the #ifdef's for adaptive mutexes and rwlocks by conditionally defining a macro earlier in the file. - Add NO_ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS option to disable adaptive spinning for rwlocks.
2007-03-22 16:09:23 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
Adaptively spin before blocking on the turnstile if an rwlock is write locked. In general the adaptive spinning is similar to the same code for mutexes with some extra trickiness in rw_wunlock_hard(). Specifically, even though both wait bits might be set and we might have a turnstile with at least one waiting thread, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we are not waking up (they might all be spinning), and we should only preserve the waiting flag for the queue we aren't waking up if there are in fact threads blocked on that queue. Secondly, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we have chosen to waken threads from (there might only be threads blocked on the other queue and the threads for this queue are all spinning) in which case we disown the turnstile instead of doing a braodcast and unpend.
2006-04-18 18:27:54 +00:00
volatile struct thread *owner;
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
int spintries = 0;
int i;
'owner' is not used without SMP. Fix kernel build for such kernel configurations. Approved by: jhb
2006-04-18 20:32:42 +00:00
#endif
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
uintptr_t v, x;
- Wrap lock profiling state variables in #ifdef LOCK_PROFILING blocks.
2009-03-15 08:03:54 +00:00
#ifdef LOCK_PROFILING
uint64_t waittime = 0;
Fix some problems with lock profiling in rw locks: - Adjust lock_profiling stubs semantic in the hard functions in order to be more accurate and trustable - As for sx locks, disable shared paths for lock_profiling. Actually, lock_profiling has a subtle race which makes results caming from shared paths not completely trustable. A macro stub (LOCK_PROFILING_SHARED) can be actually used for re-enabling this paths, but is currently intended for developing use only. - style(9) fixes Approved by: jeff, kmacy, jhb[1] Approved by: re [1] Had initial reservations not shared by others, conceded in the end.
2007-07-20 08:43:42 +00:00
int contested = 0;
- Wrap lock profiling state variables in #ifdef LOCK_PROFILING blocks.
2009-03-15 08:03:54 +00:00
#endif
locks: fix up ifdef guards introduced in r303643 Both sx and rwlocks had copy-pasted ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES instead of the correct define. MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-02 00:15:08 +00:00
#if defined(ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS) || defined(KDTRACE_HOOKS)
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
struct lock_delay_arg lda;
#endif
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
uintptr_t state;
locks: change sleep_cnt and spin_cnt types to u_int Both variables are uint64_t, but they only count spins or sleeps. All reasonable values which we can get here comfortably hit in 32-bit range. Suggested by: kib MFC after: 1 week
2016-07-31 12:11:55 +00:00
u_int sleep_cnt = 0;
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
int64_t sleep_time = 0;
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
int64_t all_time = 0;
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return;
locks: fix compilation for KDTRACE_HOOKS && !ADAPTIVE_* case Reported by: Michael Butler <imb protected-networks.net>
2016-08-02 03:05:59 +00:00
#if defined(ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS)
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
lock_delay_arg_init(&lda, &rw_delay);
locks: fix compilation for KDTRACE_HOOKS && !ADAPTIVE_* case Reported by: Michael Butler <imb protected-networks.net>
2016-08-02 03:05:59 +00:00
#elif defined(KDTRACE_HOOKS)
lock_delay_arg_init(&lda, NULL);
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
#endif
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (rw_wlocked(rw)) {
Handle lock recursion differenty by always checking against LO_RECURSABLE instead the lock own flag itself. Tested by: pho
2009-06-02 13:03:35 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->lock_object.lo_flags & LO_RECURSABLE,
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
("%s: recursing but non-recursive rw %s @ %s:%d\n",
__func__, rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line));
rw->rw_recurse++;
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p recursing", __func__, rw);
return;
}
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR5(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %s contested (lock=%p) at %s:%d", __func__,
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
rw->lock_object.lo_name, (void *)rw->rw_lock, file, line);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
all_time -= lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
state = rw->rw_lock;
#endif
Microoptimize locking primitives by avoiding unnecessary atomic ops. Inline version of primitives do an atomic op and if it fails they fallback to actual primitives, which immediately retry the atomic op. The obvious optimisation is to check if the lock is free and only then proceed to do an atomic op. Reviewed by: jhb, vangyzen
2016-06-01 18:32:20 +00:00
for (;;) {
if (rw->rw_lock == RW_UNLOCKED && _rw_write_lock(rw, tid))
break;
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
lda.spin_cnt++;
Add software PMC support. New kernel events can be added at various location for sampling or counting. This will for example allow easy system profiling whatever the processor is with known tools like pmcstat(8). Simultaneous usage of software PMC and hardware PMC is possible, for example looking at the lock acquire failure, page fault while sampling on instructions. Sponsored by: NETASQ MFC after: 1 month
2012-03-28 20:58:30 +00:00
#endif
#ifdef HWPMC_HOOKS
PMC_SOFT_CALL( , , lock, failed);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
- Re-implement lock profiling in such a way that it no longer breaks the ABI when enabled. There is no longer an embedded lock_profile_object in each lock. Instead a list of lock_profile_objects is kept per-thread for each lock it may own. The cnt_hold statistic is now always 0 to facilitate this. - Support shared locking by tracking individual lock instances and statistics in the per-thread per-instance lock_profile_object. - Make the lock profiling hash table a per-cpu singly linked list with a per-cpu static lock_prof allocator. This removes the need for an array of spinlocks and reduces cache contention between cores. - Use a seperate hash for spinlocks and other locks so that only a critical_enter() is required and not a spinlock_enter() to modify the per-cpu tables. - Count time spent spinning in the lock statistics. - Remove the LOCK_PROFILE_SHARED option as it is always supported now. - Specifically drop and release the scheduler locks in both schedulers since we track owners now. In collaboration with: Kip Macy Sponsored by: Nokia
2007-12-15 23:13:31 +00:00
lock_profile_obtain_lock_failed(&rw->lock_object,
&contested, &waittime);
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
/*
* If the lock is write locked and the owner is
* running on another CPU, spin until the owner stops
* running or the state of the lock changes.
*/
v = rw->rw_lock;
owner = (struct thread *)RW_OWNER(v);
if (!(v & RW_LOCK_READ) && TD_IS_RUNNING(owner)) {
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
CTR3(KTR_LOCK, "%s: spinning on %p held by %p",
__func__, rw, owner);
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE1(KTR_SCHED, "thread", sched_tdname(curthread),
"spinning", "lockname:\"%s\"",
rw->lock_object.lo_name);
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
while ((struct thread*)RW_OWNER(rw->rw_lock) == owner &&
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
TD_IS_RUNNING(owner))
lock_delay(&lda);
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE0(KTR_SCHED, "thread", sched_tdname(curthread),
"running");
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
continue;
}
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
if ((v & RW_LOCK_READ) && RW_READERS(v) &&
spintries < rowner_retries) {
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if (!(v & RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER)) {
if (!atomic_cmpset_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v,
v | RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER)) {
continue;
}
}
spintries++;
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE1(KTR_SCHED, "thread", sched_tdname(curthread),
"spinning", "lockname:\"%s\"",
rw->lock_object.lo_name);
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < rowner_loops; i++) {
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if ((rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER) == 0)
break;
cpu_spinwait();
}
Add a new thread state "spinning" to schedgraph and add tracepoints at the start and stop of spinning waits in lock primitives.
2014-11-04 16:35:56 +00:00
KTR_STATE0(KTR_SCHED, "thread", sched_tdname(curthread),
"running");
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
lda.spin_cnt += rowner_loops - i;
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
- Add sysctls at debug.rwlock to control the behavior of the speculative spinning when readers hold a lock. This spinning is speculative because, unlike the write case, we can not test whether the owners are running. - Add speculative read spinning for readers who are blocked by pending writers while a read lock is still held. This allows the thread to spin until the write lock succeeds after which it may spin until the writer has released the lock. This prevents excessive context switches when readers and writers both hold the lock for brief periods. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-04-04 10:00:46 +00:00
if (i != rowner_loops)
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
continue;
}
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
#endif
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
ts = turnstile_trywait(&rw->lock_object);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
v = rw->rw_lock;
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
/*
Tweak a few comments on adaptive spinning.
2009-05-29 13:56:34 +00:00
* The current lock owner might have started executing
* on another CPU (or the lock could have changed
* owners) while we were waiting on the turnstile
* chain lock. If so, drop the turnstile lock and try
* again.
Simplify the adaptive spinning algorithm in rwlock and mutex: currently, before to spin the turnstile spinlock is acquired and the waiters flag is set. This is not strictly necessary, so just spin before to acquire the spinlock and to set the flags. This will simplify a lot other functions too, as now we have the waiters flag set only if there are actually waiters. This should make wakeup/sleeping couplet faster under intensive mutex workload. This also fixes a bug in rw_try_upgrade() in the adaptive case, where turnstile_lookup() will recurse on the ts_lock lock that will never be really released [1]. [1] Reported by: jeff with Nokia help Tested by: pho, kris (earlier, bugged version of rwlock part) Discussed with: jhb [2], jeff MFC after: 1 week [2] John had a similar patch about 6.x and/or 7.x about mutexes probabilly
2007-11-26 22:37:35 +00:00
*/
if (!(v & RW_LOCK_READ)) {
owner = (struct thread *)RW_OWNER(v);
if (TD_IS_RUNNING(owner)) {
turnstile_cancel(ts);
continue;
}
}
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
/*
Improve a comment which, in the actual CVS stock, doesn't completely explain the logic of the code chunk.
2008-05-27 00:27:50 +00:00
* Check for the waiters flags about this rwlock.
* If the lock was released, without maintain any pending
* waiters queue, simply try to acquire it.
* If a pending waiters queue is present, claim the lock
* ownership and maintain the pending queue.
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
*/
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
x = v & (RW_LOCK_WAITERS | RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER);
if ((v & ~x) == RW_UNLOCKED) {
x &= ~RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNER;
if (atomic_cmpset_acq_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v, tid | x)) {
if (x)
turnstile_claim(ts);
else
turnstile_cancel(ts);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
break;
}
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_cancel(ts);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
continue;
}
/*
* If the RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS flag isn't set, then try to
* set it. If we fail to set it, then loop back and try
* again.
*/
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
if (!(v & RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS)) {
if (!atomic_cmpset_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v,
v | RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS)) {
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_cancel(ts);
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
continue;
}
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p set write waiters flag",
__func__, rw);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
/*
* We were unable to acquire the lock and the write waiters
* flag is set, so we must block on the turnstile.
*/
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p blocking on turnstile", __func__,
rw);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
sleep_time -= lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_wait(ts, rw_owner(rw), TS_EXCLUSIVE_QUEUE);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
sleep_time += lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
sleep_cnt++;
#endif
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p resuming from turnstile",
__func__, rw);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
#ifdef ADAPTIVE_RWLOCKS
spintries = 0;
#endif
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#ifdef KDTRACE_HOOKS
Pass the lock object to lockstat_nsecs() and return immediately if LO_NOPROFILE is set. Some timecounter handlers acquire a spin mutex, and we don't want to recurse if lockstat probes are enabled. PR: 201642 Reviewed by: avg MFC after: 3 days
2015-07-18 00:57:30 +00:00
all_time += lockstat_nsecs(&rw->lock_object);
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
if (sleep_time)
Implement the lockstat provider using SDT(9) instead of the custom provider in lockstat.ko. This means that lockstat probes now have typed arguments and will utilize SDT probe hot-patching support when it arrives. Reviewed by: gnn Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2993
2015-07-19 22:14:09 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_RECORD4(rw__block, rw, sleep_time,
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_WRITER, (state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0,
(state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0 ? 0 : RW_READERS(state));
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
/* Record only the loops spinning and not sleeping. */
Implement trivial backoff for locking primitives. All current spinning loops retry an atomic op the first chance they get, which leads to performance degradation under load. One classic solution to the problem consists of delaying the test to an extent. This implementation has a trivial linear increment and a random factor for each attempt. For simplicity, this first thouch implementation only modifies spinning loops where the lock owner is running. spin mutexes and thread lock were not modified. Current parameters are autotuned on boot based on mp_cpus. Autotune factors are very conservative and are subject to change later. Reviewed by: kib, jhb Tested by: pho MFC after: 1 week
2016-08-01 21:48:37 +00:00
if (lda.spin_cnt > sleep_cnt)
Implement the lockstat provider using SDT(9) instead of the custom provider in lockstat.ko. This means that lockstat probes now have typed arguments and will utilize SDT probe hot-patching support when it arrives. Reviewed by: gnn Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2993
2015-07-19 22:14:09 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_RECORD4(rw__spin, rw, all_time - sleep_time,
rwlock: s/READER/WRITER/ in wlock lockstat annotation
2016-07-30 22:21:48 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_WRITER, (state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0,
several lockstat improvements 0. For spin events report time spent spinning, not a loop count. While loop count is much easier and cheaper to obtain it is hard to reason about the reported numbers, espcially for adaptive locks where both spinning and sleeping can happen. So, it's better to compare apples and apples. 1. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD rw locks. This is done in part by changing the corresponding probes and in part by changing what probes lockstat should expect. 2. Teach lockstat that rw locks are adaptive and can spin on FreeBSD. 3. Report lock acquisition events for successful rw try-lock operations. 4. Teach lockstat about FreeBSD sx locks. Reporting of events for those locks completely mirrors rw locks. 5. Report spin and block events before acquisition event. This is behavior documented for the upstream, so it makes sense to stick to it. Note that because of FreeBSD adaptive lock implementations both the spin and block events may be reported for the same acquisition while the upstream reports only one of them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2727 Reviewed by: markj MFC after: 17 days Relnotes: yes Sponsored by: ClusterHQ
2015-06-12 10:01:24 +00:00
(state & RW_LOCK_READ) == 0 ? 0 : RW_READERS(state));
Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to gather contention statistics and other locking information for dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential consumers. Reviewed by: attilio jhb jb Approved by: gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
#endif
Consistently use a reader/writer flag for lockstat probes in rwlock(9) and sx(9), rather than using the probe function name to determine whether a given lock is a read lock or a write lock. Update lockstat(1) accordingly.
2015-07-19 22:24:33 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_PROFILE_OBTAIN_RWLOCK_SUCCESS(rw__acquire, rw, contested,
waittime, file, line, LOCKSTAT_WRITER);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
/*
* This function is called if the first try at releasing a write lock failed.
* This means that one of the 2 waiter bits must be set indicating that at
* least one thread is waiting on this lock.
*/
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_wunlock_hard(volatile uintptr_t *c, uintptr_t tid, const char *file,
int line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
struct turnstile *ts;
uintptr_t v;
int queue;
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (rw_wlocked(rw) && rw_recursed(rw)) {
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
rw->rw_recurse--;
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p unrecursing", __func__, rw);
return;
}
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock & (RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS | RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS),
("%s: neither of the waiter flags are set", __func__));
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR2(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p contested", __func__, rw);
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_chain_lock(&rw->lock_object);
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
ts = turnstile_lookup(&rw->lock_object);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
MPASS(ts != NULL);
/*
* Use the same algo as sx locks for now. Prefer waking up shared
* waiters if we have any over writers. This is probably not ideal.
*
* 'v' is the value we are going to write back to rw_lock. If we
* have waiters on both queues, we need to preserve the state of
* the waiter flag for the queue we don't wake up. For now this is
* hardcoded for the algorithm mentioned above.
*
* In the case of both readers and writers waiting we wakeup the
* readers but leave the RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS flag set. If a
* new writer comes in before a reader it will claim the lock up
* above. There is probably a potential priority inversion in
* there that could be worked around either by waking both queues
* of waiters or doing some complicated lock handoff gymnastics.
*/
Adaptively spin before blocking on the turnstile if an rwlock is write locked. In general the adaptive spinning is similar to the same code for mutexes with some extra trickiness in rw_wunlock_hard(). Specifically, even though both wait bits might be set and we might have a turnstile with at least one waiting thread, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we are not waking up (they might all be spinning), and we should only preserve the waiting flag for the queue we aren't waking up if there are in fact threads blocked on that queue. Secondly, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we have chosen to waken threads from (there might only be threads blocked on the other queue and the threads for this queue are all spinning) in which case we disown the turnstile instead of doing a braodcast and unpend.
2006-04-18 18:27:54 +00:00
v = RW_UNLOCKED;
- In rw_wunlock_hard prefer to wakeup writers if there are both readers and writers available. Doing otherwise can cause deadlocks as no read locks can proceed while there are write waiters. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-07 06:16:54 +00:00
if (rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS) {
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
queue = TS_EXCLUSIVE_QUEUE;
- In rw_wunlock_hard prefer to wakeup writers if there are both readers and writers available. Doing otherwise can cause deadlocks as no read locks can proceed while there are write waiters. Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-07 06:16:54 +00:00
v |= (rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS);
} else
queue = TS_SHARED_QUEUE;
Adaptively spin before blocking on the turnstile if an rwlock is write locked. In general the adaptive spinning is similar to the same code for mutexes with some extra trickiness in rw_wunlock_hard(). Specifically, even though both wait bits might be set and we might have a turnstile with at least one waiting thread, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we are not waking up (they might all be spinning), and we should only preserve the waiting flag for the queue we aren't waking up if there are in fact threads blocked on that queue. Secondly, there might not be any threads blocked on the queue we have chosen to waken threads from (there might only be threads blocked on the other queue and the threads for this queue are all spinning) in which case we disown the turnstile instead of doing a braodcast and unpend.
2006-04-18 18:27:54 +00:00
/* Wake up all waiters for the specific queue. */
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
if (LOCK_LOG_TEST(&rw->lock_object, 0))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
CTR3(KTR_LOCK, "%s: %p waking up %s waiters", __func__, rw,
queue == TS_SHARED_QUEUE ? "read" : "write");
turnstile_broadcast(ts, queue);
atomic_store_rel_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v);
turnstile_unpend(ts, TS_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK);
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_chain_unlock(&rw->lock_object);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
/*
* Attempt to do a non-blocking upgrade from a read lock to a write
* lock. This will only succeed if this thread holds a single read
* lock. Returns true if the upgrade succeeded and false otherwise.
*/
int
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_try_upgrade(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
uintptr_t v, x, tid;
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
struct turnstile *ts;
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
int success;
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return (1);
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_try_upgrade() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_assert(c, RA_RLOCKED, file, line);
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
/*
* Attempt to switch from one reader to a writer. If there
* are any write waiters, then we will have to lock the
* turnstile first to prevent races with another writer
* calling turnstile_wait() before we have claimed this
* turnstile. So, do the simple case of no waiters first.
*/
tid = (uintptr_t)curthread;
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
success = 0;
for (;;) {
v = rw->rw_lock;
if (RW_READERS(v) > 1)
break;
if (!(v & RW_LOCK_WAITERS)) {
success = atomic_cmpset_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v, tid);
if (!success)
continue;
break;
}
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
/*
* Ok, we think we have waiters, so lock the turnstile.
*/
ts = turnstile_trywait(&rw->lock_object);
v = rw->rw_lock;
if (RW_READERS(v) > 1) {
turnstile_cancel(ts);
break;
}
/*
* Try to switch from one reader to a writer again. This time
* we honor the current state of the waiters flags.
* If we obtain the lock with the flags set, then claim
* ownership of the turnstile.
*/
x = rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_WAITERS;
success = atomic_cmpset_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, v, tid | x);
if (success) {
if (x)
turnstile_claim(ts);
else
turnstile_cancel(ts);
break;
}
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_cancel(ts);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
}
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
LOCK_LOG_TRY("WUPGRADE", &rw->lock_object, 0, success, file, line);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if (success) {
curthread->td_rw_rlocks--;
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
WITNESS_UPGRADE(&rw->lock_object, LOP_EXCLUSIVE | LOP_TRYLOCK,
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
file, line);
Implement the lockstat provider using SDT(9) instead of the custom provider in lockstat.ko. This means that lockstat probes now have typed arguments and will utilize SDT probe hot-patching support when it arrives. Reviewed by: gnn Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2993
2015-07-19 22:14:09 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_RECORD0(rw__upgrade, rw);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
}
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
return (success);
}
/*
* Downgrade a write lock into a single read lock.
*/
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_downgrade(volatile uintptr_t *c, const char *file, int line)
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
struct rwlock *rw;
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
struct turnstile *ts;
uintptr_t tid, v;
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
int rwait, wwait;
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
panic: add a switch and infrastructure for stopping other CPUs in SMP case Historical behavior of letting other CPUs merily go on is a default for time being. The new behavior can be switched on via kern.stop_scheduler_on_panic tunable and sysctl. Stopping of the CPUs has (at least) the following benefits: - more of the system state at panic time is preserved intact - threads and interrupts do not interfere with dumping of the system state Only one thread runs uninterrupted after panic if stop_scheduler_on_panic is set. That thread might call code that is also used in normal context and that code might use locks to prevent concurrent execution of certain parts. Those locks might be held by the stopped threads and would never be released. To work around this issue, it was decided that instead of explicit checks for panic context, we would rather put those checks inside the locking primitives. This change has substantial portions written and re-written by attilio and kib at various times. Other changes are heavily based on the ideas and patches submitted by jhb and mdf. bde has provided many insights into the details and history of the current code. The new behavior may cause problems for systems that use a USB keyboard for interfacing with system console. This is because of some unusual locking patterns in the ukbd code which have to be used because on one hand ukbd is below syscons, but on the other hand it has to interface with other usb code that uses regular mutexes/Giant for its concurrency protection. Dumping to USB-connected disks may also be affected. PR: amd64/139614 (at least) In cooperation with: attilio, jhb, kib, mdf Discussed with: arch@, bde Tested by: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, gnn, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, glebius, Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> (various versions of the patch) MFC after: 3 months (or never)
2011-12-11 21:02:01 +00:00
if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
return;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
KASSERT(rw->rw_lock != RW_DESTROYED,
("rw_downgrade() of destroyed rwlock @ %s:%d", file, line));
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_assert(c, RA_WLOCKED | RA_NOTRECURSED, file, line);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
#ifndef INVARIANTS
if (rw_recursed(rw))
panic("downgrade of a recursed lock");
#endif
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
WITNESS_DOWNGRADE(&rw->lock_object, 0, file, line);
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
/*
* Convert from a writer to a single reader. First we handle
* the easy case with no waiters. If there are any waiters, we
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
* lock the turnstile and "disown" the lock.
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
*/
tid = (uintptr_t)curthread;
if (atomic_cmpset_rel_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, tid, RW_READERS_LOCK(1)))
goto out;
/*
* Ok, we think we have waiters, so lock the turnstile so we can
* read the waiter flags without any races.
*/
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_chain_lock(&rw->lock_object);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
v = rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_WAITERS;
rwait = v & RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS;
wwait = v & RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS;
MPASS(rwait | wwait);
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
/*
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
* Downgrade from a write lock while preserving waiters flag
* and give up ownership of the turnstile.
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
*/
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
ts = turnstile_lookup(&rw->lock_object);
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
MPASS(ts != NULL);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
if (!wwait)
v &= ~RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS;
atomic_store_rel_ptr(&rw->rw_lock, RW_READERS_LOCK(1) | v);
/*
* Wake other readers if there are no writers pending. Otherwise they
* won't be able to acquire the lock anyway.
*/
if (rwait && !wwait) {
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
turnstile_broadcast(ts, TS_SHARED_QUEUE);
turnstile_unpend(ts, TS_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK);
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
} else
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
turnstile_disown(ts);
Commit 3/14 of sched_lock decomposition. - Add a per-turnstile spinlock to solve potential priority propagation deadlocks that are possible with thread_lock(). - The turnstile lock order is defined as the exact opposite of the lock order used with the sleep locks they represent. This allows us to walk in reverse order in priority_propagate and this is the only place we wish to multiply acquire turnstile locks. - Use the turnstile_chain lock to protect assigning mutexes to turnstiles. - Change the turnstile interface to pass back turnstile pointers to the consumers. This allows us to reduce some locking and makes it easier to cancel turnstile assignment while the turnstile chain lock is held. Tested by: kris, current@ Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc. Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:51:44 +00:00
turnstile_chain_unlock(&rw->lock_object);
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
out:
Adaptive spinning in write path with readers and writer starvation avoidance. - Move recursion checking into rwlock inlines to free a bit for use with adaptive spinners. - Clear the RW_LOCK_WRITE_SPINNERS flag whenever the lock state changes causing write spinners to restart their loop. - Write spinners are limited by a count while readers hold the lock as there is no way to know for certain whether readers are running still. - In the read path block if there are write waiters or spinners to avoid starving writers. Use a new per-thread count, td_rw_rlocks, to skip starvation avoidance if it might cause a deadlock. - Remove or change invalid assertions in turnstiles. Reviewed by: attilio (developed parts of the patch as well) Sponsored by: Nokia
2008-02-06 01:02:13 +00:00
curthread->td_rw_rlocks++;
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
LOCK_LOG_LOCK("WDOWNGRADE", &rw->lock_object, 0, 0, file, line);
Implement the lockstat provider using SDT(9) instead of the custom provider in lockstat.ko. This means that lockstat probes now have typed arguments and will utilize SDT probe hot-patching support when it arrives. Reviewed by: gnn Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2993
2015-07-19 22:14:09 +00:00
LOCKSTAT_RECORD0(rw__downgrade, rw);
Implement rw_try_upgrade() and rw_downgrade(). rw_try_upgrade() makes a single attempt at upgrading a read lock to a write lock, and rw_downgrade() converts curthread's write lock into a read lock.
2006-04-19 21:06:52 +00:00
}
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#ifdef INVARIANT_SUPPORT
Fix another compile problem. If I find any more, this file is going in the Attic until it is properly fixed.
2006-02-01 04:18:07 +00:00
#ifndef INVARIANTS
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
#undef __rw_assert
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#endif
/*
* In the non-WITNESS case, rw_assert() can only detect that at least
* *some* thread owns an rlock, but it cannot guarantee that *this*
* thread owns an rlock.
*/
void
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
__rw_assert(const volatile uintptr_t *c, int what, const char *file, int line)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
const struct rwlock *rw;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
if (panicstr != NULL)
return;
Merge r242395,242483 from mutex implementation: give rwlock(9) the ability to crunch different type of structures, with the only constraint that they have a lock cookie named rw_lock. This name, then, becames reserved from the struct that wants to use the rwlock(9) KPI and other locking primitives cannot reuse it for their members. Namely such structs are the current struct rwlock and the new struct rwlock_padalign. The new structure will define an object which has the same layout of a struct rwlock but will be allocated in areas aligned to the cache line size and will be as big as a cache line. For further details check comments on above mentioned revisions. Reviewed by: jimharris, jeff
2012-11-03 15:57:37 +00:00
rw = rwlock2rw(c);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
switch (what) {
case RA_LOCKED:
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
case RA_LOCKED | RA_RECURSED:
case RA_LOCKED | RA_NOTRECURSED:
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
case RA_RLOCKED:
- Handle the recursed/not recursed flags with RA_RLOCKED in rw_assert(). - Tweak a panic message.
2013-06-03 17:38:57 +00:00
case RA_RLOCKED | RA_RECURSED:
case RA_RLOCKED | RA_NOTRECURSED:
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#ifdef WITNESS
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
witness_assert(&rw->lock_object, what, file, line);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#else
/*
* If some other thread has a write lock or we have one
* and are asserting a read lock, fail. Also, if no one
* has a lock at all, fail.
*/
Regroup order of operations to better reflect what was probably intended. Submitted by: Peter Jeremy
2006-01-30 19:25:52 +00:00
if (rw->rw_lock == RW_UNLOCKED ||
- Handle the recursed/not recursed flags with RA_RLOCKED in rw_assert(). - Tweak a panic message.
2013-06-03 17:38:57 +00:00
(!(rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_READ) && (what & RA_RLOCKED ||
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
rw_wowner(rw) != curthread)))
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic("Lock %s not %slocked @ %s:%d\n",
- Handle the recursed/not recursed flags with RA_RLOCKED in rw_assert(). - Tweak a panic message.
2013-06-03 17:38:57 +00:00
rw->lock_object.lo_name, (what & RA_RLOCKED) ?
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
"read " : "", file, line);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
- Handle the recursed/not recursed flags with RA_RLOCKED in rw_assert(). - Tweak a panic message.
2013-06-03 17:38:57 +00:00
if (!(rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_READ) && !(what & RA_RLOCKED)) {
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (rw_recursed(rw)) {
if (what & RA_NOTRECURSED)
panic("Lock %s recursed @ %s:%d\n",
rw->lock_object.lo_name, file,
line);
} else if (what & RA_RECURSED)
panic("Lock %s not recursed @ %s:%d\n",
rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line);
}
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#endif
break;
case RA_WLOCKED:
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
case RA_WLOCKED | RA_RECURSED:
case RA_WLOCKED | RA_NOTRECURSED:
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
if (rw_wowner(rw) != curthread)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic("Lock %s not exclusively locked @ %s:%d\n",
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (rw_recursed(rw)) {
if (what & RA_NOTRECURSED)
panic("Lock %s recursed @ %s:%d\n",
rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line);
} else if (what & RA_RECURSED)
panic("Lock %s not recursed @ %s:%d\n",
rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
break;
case RA_UNLOCKED:
#ifdef WITNESS
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
witness_assert(&rw->lock_object, what, file, line);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#else
/*
* If we hold a write lock fail. We can't reliably check
* to see if we hold a read lock or not.
*/
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
if (rw_wowner(rw) == curthread)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
panic("Lock %s exclusively locked @ %s:%d\n",
Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes, rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00
rw->lock_object.lo_name, file, line);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
#endif
break;
default:
panic("Unknown rw lock assertion: %d @ %s:%d", what, file,
line);
}
}
#endif /* INVARIANT_SUPPORT */
#ifdef DDB
void
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
db_show_rwlock(const struct lock_object *lock)
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
{
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
const struct rwlock *rw;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
struct thread *td;
Constify arguments for locking KPIs where possible. This enables locking consumers to pass their own structures around as const and be able to assert locks embedded into those structures. Reviewed by: ed, kib, jhb
2011-11-16 21:51:17 +00:00
rw = (const struct rwlock *)lock;
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
db_printf(" state: ");
if (rw->rw_lock == RW_UNLOCKED)
db_printf("UNLOCKED\n");
Add destroyed cookie values for sx locks and rwlocks as well as extra KASSERTs so that any lock operations on a destroyed lock will panic or hang.
2007-05-08 21:51:37 +00:00
else if (rw->rw_lock == RW_DESTROYED) {
db_printf("DESTROYED\n");
return;
} else if (rw->rw_lock & RW_LOCK_READ)
Print readers count as unsigned in ddb 'show lock'. Submitted by: attilio
2007-03-13 16:51:27 +00:00
db_printf("RLOCK: %ju locks\n",
(uintmax_t)(RW_READERS(rw->rw_lock)));
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
else {
- Add a rw_wowner() macro that just returns the owner of a write lock and use it in places that only care about the write owner instead of rw_owner() as a baby step towards limited read-lock owner. - Tidy the code that sets the WAITER flag bits to not duplicate a test around the atomic operation and the KTR trace in both of the lock functions.
2006-04-17 21:11:01 +00:00
td = rw_wowner(rw);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
db_printf("WLOCK: %p (tid %d, pid %d, \"%s\")\n", td,
generally we are interested in what thread did something as opposed to what process. Since threads by default have teh name of the process unless over-written with more useful information, just print the thread name instead.
2007-11-14 06:21:24 +00:00
td->td_tid, td->td_proc->p_pid, td->td_name);
Introduce a new rwlocks initialization function: rw_init_flags. This is very similar to sx_init_flags: it initializes the rwlock using special flags passed as third argument (RW_DUPOK, RW_NOPROFILE, RW_NOWITNESS, RW_QUIET, RW_RECURSE). Among these, the most important new feature is probabilly that rwlocks can be acquired recursively now (for both shared and exclusive paths). Because of the recursion counter, the ABI is changed. Tested by: Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@gufi.org> Reviewed by: jhb Approved by: jeff (mentor) Approved by: re
2007-06-26 21:31:56 +00:00
if (rw_recursed(rw))
db_printf(" recursed: %u\n", rw->rw_recurse);
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
}
db_printf(" waiters: ");
switch (rw->rw_lock & (RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS | RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS)) {
case RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS:
db_printf("readers\n");
break;
case RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS:
db_printf("writers\n");
break;
case RW_LOCK_READ_WAITERS | RW_LOCK_WRITE_WAITERS:
Fix a typo.
2007-03-12 20:10:29 +00:00
db_printf("readers and writers\n");
Add a basic reader/writer lock implementation to the kernel. This implementation is by no means perfect as far as some of the algorithms that it uses and the fact that it is missing some functionality (try locks and upgrades/downgrades are not there yet), however it does seem to work in my local testing. There is more detail in the comments in the code, but the short version follows. A reader/writer lock is very much like a regular mutex: it cannot be held across a voluntary sleep; it can be acquired in an interrupt thread; if the lock is held by a writer then the priority of any threads that block on the lock will be lent to the owner; the simple case lock operations all are done in a single atomic op. It also shares some similiarities with sx locks: it supports reader/writer semantics (multiple readers, but single writers); readers are allowed to recurse, but writers are not. We can extend this implementation further by either improving algorithms or adding new functionality, but this should at least give us a base to work with now. Reviewed by: arch (in theory) Tested on: i386 (4 cpu box with a kernel module that used 4 threads that randomly chose between read locks and write locks that ran w/o panicing for over a day solid. It usually panic'd within a few seconds when there were bugs during testing. :) The kernel module source is available on request.)
2006-01-27 23:13:26 +00:00
break;
default:
db_printf("none\n");
break;
}
}
#endif
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink