freebsd-skq/libexec/rtld-elf/alpha/rtld_start.S

219 lines
5.6 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

1999-08-28 00:22:10 +00:00
/* $FreeBSD$ */
/* From: NetBSD: rtld_start.S,v 1.1 1996/12/16 20:38:09 cgd Exp */
/*
* Copyright 1996 Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>
Solve the dynamic linker's problems with multithreaded programs once and for all (I hope). Packages such as wine, JDK, and linuxthreads should no longer have any problems with re-entering the dynamic linker. This commit replaces the locking used in the dynamic linker with a new spinlock-based reader/writer lock implementation. Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green> argued for this from the very beginning, but it took me a long time to come around to his point of view. Spinlocks are the only kinds of locks that work with all thread packages. But on uniprocessor systems they can be inefficient, because while a contender for the lock is spinning the holder of the lock cannot make any progress toward releasing it. To alleviate this disadvantage I have borrowed a trick from Sleepycat's Berkeley DB implementation. When spinning for a lock, the requester does a nanosleep() call for 1 usec. each time around the loop. This will generally yield the CPU to other threads, allowing the lock holder to finish its business and release the lock. I chose 1 usec. as the minimum sleep which would with reasonable certainty not be rounded down to 0. The formerly machine-independent file "lockdflt.c" has been moved into the architecture-specific subdirectories by repository copy. It now contains the machine-dependent spinlocking code. For the spinlocks I used the very nifty "simple, non-scalable reader-preference lock" which I found at <http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/scott/synchronization/pseudocode/rw.html> on all CPUs except the 80386 (the specific CPU model, not the architecture). The 80386 CPU doesn't support the necessary "cmpxchg" instruction, so on that CPU a simple exclusive test-and-set lock is used instead. 80386 CPUs are detected at initialization time by trying to execute "cmpxchg" and catching the resulting SIGILL signal. To reduce contention for the locks, I have revamped a couple of key data structures, permitting all common operations to be done under non-exclusive (reader) locking. The only operations that require exclusive locking now are the rare intrusive operations such as dlopen() and dlclose(). The dllockinit() interface is now deprecated. It still exists, but only as a do-nothing stub. I plan to remove it as soon as is reasonably possible. (From the very beginning it was clearly labeled as experimental and subject to change.) As far as I know, only the linuxthreads port uses dllockinit(). This interface turned out to have several problems. As one example, when the dynamic linker called a client-supplied locking function, that function sometimes needed lazy binding, causing re-entry into the dynamic linker and a big looping mess. And in any case, it turned out to be too burdensome to require threads packages to register themselves with the dynamic linker.
2000-07-08 04:10:38 +00:00
* Copyright 2000 John D. Polstra
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
* 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products
* derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
* OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.
* IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
* INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
* NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
* DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
* THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
* (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
* THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
#include <machine/asm.h>
#include <machine/pal.h>
.extern _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
LEAF(_rtld_start, 0) /* XXX */
.set noreorder
br pv, $33
$33: LDGP(pv)
/* save away the stack pointer */
lda s0, 0(sp) /* get argc from stack */
lda sp, -16(sp) /* space for arguments */
/* save ps_strings pointer */
mov a3, s1
/* Step 1 -- Figure out the displacement */
br t2, $34 /* get our PC */
$34: ldiq t3, $34 /* get where the linker thought we were */
subq t2, t3, t8 /* calculate the displacement */
/* Step 2 -- Find bounds of global offset table */
lda t5, _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
addq t8, t5, t9 /* add the displacement */
lda t4, _DYNAMIC
addq t8, t4, t10 /* add the displacement */
/*
* Step 3 -- Every entry in the global offset table needs to
* modified for the displacement before any code will work.
*/
$35: ldq t1, 0(t9) /* load the value */
addq t8, t1, t1 /* add the displacement */
stq t1, 0(t9) /* save the new value */
lda t9, 8(t9) /* point to next entry */
cmpult t9, t10, t1 /* are we done? */
bne t1, $35 /* no, do more */
/*
* Ya! Things are far enough so we can do some dynamic linking!
*/
lda a0, 0(s0) /* initial sp */
lda a1, -16(s0) /* address for exit proc */
lda a2, -8(s0) /* address for obj_main */
CALL(_rtld) /* v0 = _rtld(sp, &exit_proc, &obj_main); */
ldq a1, -16(s0) /* our atexit function */
ldq a2, -8(s0) /* obj_main entry */
lda sp, 16(sp) /* readjust our stack */
mov s0, a0 /* stack pointer */
mov s1, a3 /* ps_strings pointer */
mov v0, t12
jsr ra, (v0), 0 /* (*_start)(sp, cleanup, obj); */
ldgp gp, 0(ra)
CALL(exit)
halt
END(_rtld_start)
.set noat
.globl _rtld_bind_start
.ent _rtld_bind_start
_rtld_bind_start:
lda sp, -168(sp)
.frame sp, 168, $26
/* Preserve all registers that C normally doesn't. */
stq $26, 0(sp)
stq $0, 8(sp)
stq $1, 16(sp)
stq $2, 24(sp)
stq $3, 32(sp)
stq $4, 40(sp)
stq $5, 48(sp)
stq $6, 56(sp)
stq $7, 64(sp)
stq $8, 72(sp)
stq $16, 80(sp)
stq $17, 88(sp)
stq $18, 96(sp)
stq $19, 104(sp)
stq $20, 112(sp)
stq $21, 120(sp)
stq $22, 128(sp)
stq $23, 136(sp)
stq $24, 144(sp)
stq $25, 152(sp)
stq $29, 160(sp)
.mask 0x27ff01ff, -168
/* Set up our $gp */
br gp, $100
$100: ldgp gp, 0(gp)
.prologue 1
/* Set up the arguments for _rtld_bind. */
subq at_reg, t12, a1 /* calculate reloc offset */
ldq a0, 8(t12) /* object structure */
subq a1, 20, a1 /* = (at - t11 - 20) / 12 * 24 */
addq a1, a1, a1
CALL(_rtld_bind)
/* Move the destination address into position. */
mov $0, $27
/* Restore program registers. */
ldq $26, 0(sp)
ldq $0, 8(sp)
ldq $1, 16(sp)
ldq $2, 24(sp)
ldq $3, 32(sp)
ldq $4, 40(sp)
ldq $5, 48(sp)
ldq $6, 56(sp)
ldq $7, 64(sp)
ldq $8, 72(sp)
ldq $16, 80(sp)
ldq $17, 88(sp)
ldq $18, 96(sp)
ldq $19, 104(sp)
ldq $20, 112(sp)
ldq $21, 120(sp)
ldq $22, 128(sp)
ldq $23, 136(sp)
ldq $24, 144(sp)
ldq $25, 152(sp)
ldq $29, 160(sp)
/* Flush the Icache after having modified the .plt code. */
imb
/* Clean up and turn control to the destination */
lda sp, 168(sp)
jmp $31, ($27)
.end _rtld_bind_start
Solve the dynamic linker's problems with multithreaded programs once and for all (I hope). Packages such as wine, JDK, and linuxthreads should no longer have any problems with re-entering the dynamic linker. This commit replaces the locking used in the dynamic linker with a new spinlock-based reader/writer lock implementation. Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green> argued for this from the very beginning, but it took me a long time to come around to his point of view. Spinlocks are the only kinds of locks that work with all thread packages. But on uniprocessor systems they can be inefficient, because while a contender for the lock is spinning the holder of the lock cannot make any progress toward releasing it. To alleviate this disadvantage I have borrowed a trick from Sleepycat's Berkeley DB implementation. When spinning for a lock, the requester does a nanosleep() call for 1 usec. each time around the loop. This will generally yield the CPU to other threads, allowing the lock holder to finish its business and release the lock. I chose 1 usec. as the minimum sleep which would with reasonable certainty not be rounded down to 0. The formerly machine-independent file "lockdflt.c" has been moved into the architecture-specific subdirectories by repository copy. It now contains the machine-dependent spinlocking code. For the spinlocks I used the very nifty "simple, non-scalable reader-preference lock" which I found at <http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/scott/synchronization/pseudocode/rw.html> on all CPUs except the 80386 (the specific CPU model, not the architecture). The 80386 CPU doesn't support the necessary "cmpxchg" instruction, so on that CPU a simple exclusive test-and-set lock is used instead. 80386 CPUs are detected at initialization time by trying to execute "cmpxchg" and catching the resulting SIGILL signal. To reduce contention for the locks, I have revamped a couple of key data structures, permitting all common operations to be done under non-exclusive (reader) locking. The only operations that require exclusive locking now are the rare intrusive operations such as dlopen() and dlclose(). The dllockinit() interface is now deprecated. It still exists, but only as a do-nothing stub. I plan to remove it as soon as is reasonably possible. (From the very beginning it was clearly labeled as experimental and subject to change.) As far as I know, only the linuxthreads port uses dllockinit(). This interface turned out to have several problems. As one example, when the dynamic linker called a client-supplied locking function, that function sometimes needed lazy binding, causing re-entry into the dynamic linker and a big looping mess. And in any case, it turned out to be too burdensome to require threads packages to register themselves with the dynamic linker.
2000-07-08 04:10:38 +00:00
/*
* int cmp0_and_store_int(volatile int *p, int newval);
*
* If an int holds 0, store newval into it; else do nothing. Returns
* the previous value.
*/
LEAF(cmp0_and_store_int, 2)
1: mov a1, t0
ldl_l v0, 0(a0)
bne v0, 3f
stl_c t0, 0(a0)
beq t0, 2f
mb
RET
2: br 1b
3: RET
END(cmp0_and_store_int)
LEAF(atomic_add_int, 2)
0: ldl_l t0, 0(a0)
addq t0, a1, t0
stl_c t0, 0(a0)
beq t0, 1f
mb
RET
1: br 0b
END(atomic_add_int)
/* Atomically increment an int. */
LEAF(atomic_incr_int, 1)
0: ldl_l t0, 0(a0)
addq t0, 1, t0
stl_c t0, 0(a0)
beq t0, 1f
mb
RET
1: br 0b
END(atomic_incr_int)
/* Atomically decrement an int. */
LEAF(atomic_decr_int, 1)
0: ldl_l t0, 0(a0)
subq t0, 1, t0
stl_c t0, 0(a0)
beq t0, 1f
mb
RET
1: br 0b
END(atomic_decr_int)