freebsd-skq/sys/vm/vm_phys.c

1479 lines
39 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*-
* Copyright (c) 2002-2006 Rice University
* Copyright (c) 2007 Alan L. Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
* All rights reserved.
*
* This software was developed for the FreeBSD Project by Alan L. Cox,
* Olivier Crameri, Peter Druschel, Sitaram Iyer, and Juan Navarro.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
* ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
* LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
* A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
* HOLDERS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
* INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING,
* BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS
* OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED
* AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY
* WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
* POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
/*
* Physical memory system implementation
*
* Any external functions defined by this module are only to be used by the
* virtual memory system.
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
#include "opt_ddb.h"
#include "opt_vm.h"
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/systm.h>
#include <sys/lock.h>
#include <sys/kernel.h>
#include <sys/malloc.h>
#include <sys/mutex.h>
#include <sys/proc.h>
#include <sys/queue.h>
#include <sys/rwlock.h>
#include <sys/sbuf.h>
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
#include <sys/tree.h>
#include <sys/vmmeter.h>
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
#include <sys/seq.h>
#include <ddb/ddb.h>
#include <vm/vm.h>
#include <vm/vm_param.h>
#include <vm/vm_kern.h>
#include <vm/vm_object.h>
#include <vm/vm_page.h>
#include <vm/vm_phys.h>
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
#include <vm/vm_domain.h>
_Static_assert(sizeof(long) * NBBY >= VM_PHYSSEG_MAX,
"Too many physsegs.");
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
struct mem_affinity *mem_affinity;
int *mem_locality;
#endif
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
int vm_ndomains = 1;
struct vm_phys_seg vm_phys_segs[VM_PHYSSEG_MAX];
int vm_phys_nsegs;
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg;
static int vm_phys_fictitious_cmp(struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *,
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *);
RB_HEAD(fict_tree, vm_phys_fictitious_seg) vm_phys_fictitious_tree =
RB_INITIALIZER(_vm_phys_fictitious_tree);
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg {
RB_ENTRY(vm_phys_fictitious_seg) node;
/* Memory region data */
vm_paddr_t start;
vm_paddr_t end;
vm_page_t first_page;
};
RB_GENERATE_STATIC(fict_tree, vm_phys_fictitious_seg, node,
vm_phys_fictitious_cmp);
static struct rwlock vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock;
MALLOC_DEFINE(M_FICT_PAGES, "vm_fictitious", "Fictitious VM pages");
static struct vm_freelist
vm_phys_free_queues[MAXMEMDOM][VM_NFREELIST][VM_NFREEPOOL][VM_NFREEORDER];
static int vm_nfreelists;
/*
* Provides the mapping from VM_FREELIST_* to free list indices (flind).
*/
static int vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_NFREELIST];
CTASSERT(VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT == 0);
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_ISADMA
#define VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY 16777216
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_DMA32
#define VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY ((vm_paddr_t)1 << 32)
#endif
/*
* Enforce the assumptions made by vm_phys_add_seg() and vm_phys_init() about
* the ordering of the free list boundaries.
*/
#if defined(VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY) && defined(VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY)
CTASSERT(VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY < VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY);
#endif
#if defined(VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY) && defined(VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY)
CTASSERT(VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY < VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY);
#endif
static int sysctl_vm_phys_free(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS);
SYSCTL_OID(_vm, OID_AUTO, phys_free, CTLTYPE_STRING | CTLFLAG_RD,
NULL, 0, sysctl_vm_phys_free, "A", "Phys Free Info");
static int sysctl_vm_phys_segs(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS);
SYSCTL_OID(_vm, OID_AUTO, phys_segs, CTLTYPE_STRING | CTLFLAG_RD,
NULL, 0, sysctl_vm_phys_segs, "A", "Phys Seg Info");
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
static int sysctl_vm_phys_locality(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS);
SYSCTL_OID(_vm, OID_AUTO, phys_locality, CTLTYPE_STRING | CTLFLAG_RD,
NULL, 0, sysctl_vm_phys_locality, "A", "Phys Locality Info");
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
#endif
SYSCTL_INT(_vm, OID_AUTO, ndomains, CTLFLAG_RD,
&vm_ndomains, 0, "Number of physical memory domains available.");
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
/*
* Default to first-touch + round-robin.
*/
static struct mtx vm_default_policy_mtx;
MTX_SYSINIT(vm_default_policy, &vm_default_policy_mtx, "default policy mutex",
MTX_DEF);
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
static struct vm_domain_policy vm_default_policy =
VM_DOMAIN_POLICY_STATIC_INITIALISER(VM_POLICY_FIRST_TOUCH_ROUND_ROBIN, 0);
#else
/* Use round-robin so the domain policy code will only try once per allocation */
static struct vm_domain_policy vm_default_policy =
VM_DOMAIN_POLICY_STATIC_INITIALISER(VM_POLICY_ROUND_ROBIN, 0);
#endif
static vm_page_t vm_phys_alloc_domain_pages(int domain, int flind, int pool,
int order);
static vm_page_t vm_phys_alloc_seg_contig(struct vm_phys_seg *seg,
u_long npages, vm_paddr_t low, vm_paddr_t high, u_long alignment,
vm_paddr_t boundary);
static void _vm_phys_create_seg(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end, int domain);
static void vm_phys_create_seg(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end);
static int vm_phys_paddr_to_segind(vm_paddr_t pa);
static void vm_phys_split_pages(vm_page_t m, int oind, struct vm_freelist *fl,
int order);
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
static int
sysctl_vm_default_policy(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
{
char policy_name[32];
int error;
mtx_lock(&vm_default_policy_mtx);
/* Map policy to output string */
switch (vm_default_policy.p.policy) {
case VM_POLICY_FIRST_TOUCH:
strcpy(policy_name, "first-touch");
break;
case VM_POLICY_FIRST_TOUCH_ROUND_ROBIN:
strcpy(policy_name, "first-touch-rr");
break;
case VM_POLICY_ROUND_ROBIN:
default:
strcpy(policy_name, "rr");
break;
}
mtx_unlock(&vm_default_policy_mtx);
error = sysctl_handle_string(oidp, &policy_name[0],
sizeof(policy_name), req);
if (error != 0 || req->newptr == NULL)
return (error);
mtx_lock(&vm_default_policy_mtx);
/* Set: match on the subset of policies that make sense as a default */
if (strcmp("first-touch-rr", policy_name) == 0) {
vm_domain_policy_set(&vm_default_policy,
VM_POLICY_FIRST_TOUCH_ROUND_ROBIN, 0);
} else if (strcmp("first-touch", policy_name) == 0) {
vm_domain_policy_set(&vm_default_policy,
VM_POLICY_FIRST_TOUCH, 0);
} else if (strcmp("rr", policy_name) == 0) {
vm_domain_policy_set(&vm_default_policy,
VM_POLICY_ROUND_ROBIN, 0);
} else {
error = EINVAL;
goto finish;
}
error = 0;
finish:
mtx_unlock(&vm_default_policy_mtx);
return (error);
}
SYSCTL_PROC(_vm, OID_AUTO, default_policy, CTLTYPE_STRING | CTLFLAG_RW,
0, 0, sysctl_vm_default_policy, "A",
"Default policy (rr, first-touch, first-touch-rr");
/*
* Red-black tree helpers for vm fictitious range management.
*/
static inline int
vm_phys_fictitious_in_range(struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *p,
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *range)
{
KASSERT(range->start != 0 && range->end != 0,
("Invalid range passed on search for vm_fictitious page"));
if (p->start >= range->end)
return (1);
if (p->start < range->start)
return (-1);
return (0);
}
static int
vm_phys_fictitious_cmp(struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *p1,
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *p2)
{
/* Check if this is a search for a page */
if (p1->end == 0)
return (vm_phys_fictitious_in_range(p1, p2));
KASSERT(p2->end != 0,
("Invalid range passed as second parameter to vm fictitious comparison"));
/* Searching to add a new range */
if (p1->end <= p2->start)
return (-1);
if (p1->start >= p2->end)
return (1);
panic("Trying to add overlapping vm fictitious ranges:\n"
"[%#jx:%#jx] and [%#jx:%#jx]", (uintmax_t)p1->start,
(uintmax_t)p1->end, (uintmax_t)p2->start, (uintmax_t)p2->end);
}
#ifdef notyet
static __inline int
vm_rr_selectdomain(void)
{
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
struct thread *td;
td = curthread;
td->td_dom_rr_idx++;
td->td_dom_rr_idx %= vm_ndomains;
return (td->td_dom_rr_idx);
#else
return (0);
#endif
}
#endif /* notyet */
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
/*
* Initialise a VM domain iterator.
*
* Check the thread policy, then the proc policy,
* then default to the system policy.
*
* Later on the various layers will have this logic
* plumbed into them and the phys code will be explicitly
* handed a VM domain policy to use.
*/
static void
vm_policy_iterator_init(struct vm_domain_iterator *vi)
{
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
struct vm_domain_policy lcl;
#endif
vm_domain_iterator_init(vi);
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
/* Copy out the thread policy */
vm_domain_policy_localcopy(&lcl, &curthread->td_vm_dom_policy);
if (lcl.p.policy != VM_POLICY_NONE) {
/* Thread policy is present; use it */
vm_domain_iterator_set_policy(vi, &lcl);
return;
}
vm_domain_policy_localcopy(&lcl,
&curthread->td_proc->p_vm_dom_policy);
if (lcl.p.policy != VM_POLICY_NONE) {
/* Process policy is present; use it */
vm_domain_iterator_set_policy(vi, &lcl);
return;
}
#endif
/* Use system default policy */
vm_domain_iterator_set_policy(vi, &vm_default_policy);
}
static void
vm_policy_iterator_finish(struct vm_domain_iterator *vi)
{
vm_domain_iterator_cleanup(vi);
}
boolean_t
vm_phys_domain_intersects(long mask, vm_paddr_t low, vm_paddr_t high)
{
struct vm_phys_seg *s;
int idx;
while ((idx = ffsl(mask)) != 0) {
idx--; /* ffsl counts from 1 */
mask &= ~(1UL << idx);
s = &vm_phys_segs[idx];
if (low < s->end && high > s->start)
return (TRUE);
}
return (FALSE);
}
/*
* Outputs the state of the physical memory allocator, specifically,
* the amount of physical memory in each free list.
*/
static int
sysctl_vm_phys_free(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
{
struct sbuf sbuf;
struct vm_freelist *fl;
int dom, error, flind, oind, pind;
error = sysctl_wire_old_buffer(req, 0);
if (error != 0)
return (error);
sbuf_new_for_sysctl(&sbuf, NULL, 128 * vm_ndomains, req);
for (dom = 0; dom < vm_ndomains; dom++) {
sbuf_printf(&sbuf,"\nDOMAIN %d:\n", dom);
for (flind = 0; flind < vm_nfreelists; flind++) {
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "\nFREE LIST %d:\n"
"\n ORDER (SIZE) | NUMBER"
"\n ", flind);
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++)
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, " | POOL %d", pind);
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "\n-- ");
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++)
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "-- -- ");
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "--\n");
for (oind = VM_NFREEORDER - 1; oind >= 0; oind--) {
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, " %2d (%6dK)", oind,
1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10 + oind));
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++) {
fl = vm_phys_free_queues[dom][flind][pind];
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, " | %6d",
fl[oind].lcnt);
}
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "\n");
}
}
}
error = sbuf_finish(&sbuf);
sbuf_delete(&sbuf);
return (error);
}
/*
* Outputs the set of physical memory segments.
*/
static int
sysctl_vm_phys_segs(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
{
struct sbuf sbuf;
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
int error, segind;
error = sysctl_wire_old_buffer(req, 0);
if (error != 0)
return (error);
sbuf_new_for_sysctl(&sbuf, NULL, 128, req);
for (segind = 0; segind < vm_phys_nsegs; segind++) {
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "\nSEGMENT %d:\n\n", segind);
seg = &vm_phys_segs[segind];
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "start: %#jx\n",
(uintmax_t)seg->start);
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "end: %#jx\n",
(uintmax_t)seg->end);
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "domain: %d\n", seg->domain);
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "free list: %p\n", seg->free_queues);
}
error = sbuf_finish(&sbuf);
sbuf_delete(&sbuf);
return (error);
}
/*
* Return affinity, or -1 if there's no affinity information.
*/
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
int
vm_phys_mem_affinity(int f, int t)
{
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
if (mem_locality == NULL)
return (-1);
if (f >= vm_ndomains || t >= vm_ndomains)
return (-1);
return (mem_locality[f * vm_ndomains + t]);
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
#else
return (-1);
#endif
}
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
/*
* Outputs the VM locality table.
*/
static int
sysctl_vm_phys_locality(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
{
struct sbuf sbuf;
int error, i, j;
error = sysctl_wire_old_buffer(req, 0);
if (error != 0)
return (error);
sbuf_new_for_sysctl(&sbuf, NULL, 128, req);
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "\n");
for (i = 0; i < vm_ndomains; i++) {
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "%d: ", i);
for (j = 0; j < vm_ndomains; j++) {
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "%d ", vm_phys_mem_affinity(i, j));
}
sbuf_printf(&sbuf, "\n");
}
error = sbuf_finish(&sbuf);
sbuf_delete(&sbuf);
return (error);
}
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
#endif
static void
vm_freelist_add(struct vm_freelist *fl, vm_page_t m, int order, int tail)
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
{
m->order = order;
if (tail)
TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&fl[order].pl, m, plinks.q);
else
TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&fl[order].pl, m, plinks.q);
fl[order].lcnt++;
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
}
static void
vm_freelist_rem(struct vm_freelist *fl, vm_page_t m, int order)
{
TAILQ_REMOVE(&fl[order].pl, m, plinks.q);
fl[order].lcnt--;
m->order = VM_NFREEORDER;
}
/*
* Create a physical memory segment.
*/
static void
_vm_phys_create_seg(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end, int domain)
{
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
KASSERT(vm_phys_nsegs < VM_PHYSSEG_MAX,
("vm_phys_create_seg: increase VM_PHYSSEG_MAX"));
KASSERT(domain < vm_ndomains,
("vm_phys_create_seg: invalid domain provided"));
seg = &vm_phys_segs[vm_phys_nsegs++];
while (seg > vm_phys_segs && (seg - 1)->start >= end) {
*seg = *(seg - 1);
seg--;
}
seg->start = start;
seg->end = end;
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
seg->domain = domain;
}
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
static void
vm_phys_create_seg(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end)
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
{
#ifdef VM_NUMA_ALLOC
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
int i;
if (mem_affinity == NULL) {
_vm_phys_create_seg(start, end, 0);
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
return;
}
for (i = 0;; i++) {
if (mem_affinity[i].end == 0)
panic("Reached end of affinity info");
if (mem_affinity[i].end <= start)
continue;
if (mem_affinity[i].start > start)
panic("No affinity info for start %jx",
(uintmax_t)start);
if (mem_affinity[i].end >= end) {
_vm_phys_create_seg(start, end,
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
mem_affinity[i].domain);
break;
}
_vm_phys_create_seg(start, mem_affinity[i].end,
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
mem_affinity[i].domain);
start = mem_affinity[i].end;
}
#else
_vm_phys_create_seg(start, end, 0);
#endif
Very rough first cut at NUMA support for the physical page allocator. For now it uses a very dumb first-touch allocation policy. This will change in the future. - Each architecture indicates the maximum number of supported memory domains via a new VM_NDOMAIN parameter in <machine/vmparam.h>. - Each cpu now has a PCPU_GET(domain) member to indicate the memory domain a CPU belongs to. Domain values are dense and numbered from 0. - When a platform supports multiple domains, the default freelist (VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT) is split up into N freelists, one for each domain. The MD code is required to populate an array of mem_affinity structures. Each entry in the array defines a range of memory (start and end) and a domain for the range. Multiple entries may be present for a single domain. The list is terminated by an entry where all fields are zero. This array of structures is used to split up phys_avail[] regions that fall in VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT into per-domain freelists. - Each memory domain has a separate lookup-array of freelists that is used when fulfulling a physical memory allocation. Right now the per-domain freelists are listed in a round-robin order for each domain. In the future a table such as the ACPI SLIT table may be used to order the per-domain lookup lists based on the penalty for each memory domain relative to a specific domain. The lookup lists may be examined via a new vm.phys.lookup_lists sysctl. - The first-touch policy is implemented by using PCPU_GET(domain) to pick a lookup list when allocating memory. Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-27 20:33:50 +00:00
}
/*
* Add a physical memory segment.
*/
void
vm_phys_add_seg(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end)
{
vm_paddr_t paddr;
KASSERT((start & PAGE_MASK) == 0,
("vm_phys_define_seg: start is not page aligned"));
KASSERT((end & PAGE_MASK) == 0,
("vm_phys_define_seg: end is not page aligned"));
/*
* Split the physical memory segment if it spans two or more free
* list boundaries.
*/
paddr = start;
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_ISADMA
if (paddr < VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY && end > VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY) {
vm_phys_create_seg(paddr, VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY);
paddr = VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY;
}
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_LOWMEM
if (paddr < VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY && end > VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY) {
vm_phys_create_seg(paddr, VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY);
paddr = VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY;
}
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_DMA32
if (paddr < VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY && end > VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY) {
vm_phys_create_seg(paddr, VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY);
paddr = VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY;
}
#endif
vm_phys_create_seg(paddr, end);
}
/*
* Initialize the physical memory allocator.
*
* Requires that vm_page_array is initialized!
*/
void
vm_phys_init(void)
{
struct vm_freelist *fl;
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
u_long npages;
int dom, flind, freelist, oind, pind, segind;
/*
* Compute the number of free lists, and generate the mapping from the
* manifest constants VM_FREELIST_* to the free list indices.
*
* Initially, the entries of vm_freelist_to_flind[] are set to either
* 0 or 1 to indicate which free lists should be created.
*/
npages = 0;
for (segind = vm_phys_nsegs - 1; segind >= 0; segind--) {
seg = &vm_phys_segs[segind];
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_ISADMA
if (seg->end <= VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY)
vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_ISADMA] = 1;
else
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_LOWMEM
if (seg->end <= VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY)
vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_LOWMEM] = 1;
else
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_DMA32
if (
#ifdef VM_DMA32_NPAGES_THRESHOLD
/*
* Create the DMA32 free list only if the amount of
* physical memory above physical address 4G exceeds the
* given threshold.
*/
npages > VM_DMA32_NPAGES_THRESHOLD &&
#endif
seg->end <= VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY)
vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_DMA32] = 1;
else
#endif
{
npages += atop(seg->end - seg->start);
vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT] = 1;
}
}
/* Change each entry into a running total of the free lists. */
for (freelist = 1; freelist < VM_NFREELIST; freelist++) {
vm_freelist_to_flind[freelist] +=
vm_freelist_to_flind[freelist - 1];
}
vm_nfreelists = vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_NFREELIST - 1];
KASSERT(vm_nfreelists > 0, ("vm_phys_init: no free lists"));
/* Change each entry into a free list index. */
for (freelist = 0; freelist < VM_NFREELIST; freelist++)
vm_freelist_to_flind[freelist]--;
/*
* Initialize the first_page and free_queues fields of each physical
* memory segment.
*/
#ifdef VM_PHYSSEG_SPARSE
npages = 0;
#endif
for (segind = 0; segind < vm_phys_nsegs; segind++) {
seg = &vm_phys_segs[segind];
#ifdef VM_PHYSSEG_SPARSE
seg->first_page = &vm_page_array[npages];
npages += atop(seg->end - seg->start);
#else
seg->first_page = PHYS_TO_VM_PAGE(seg->start);
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_ISADMA
if (seg->end <= VM_ISADMA_BOUNDARY) {
flind = vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_ISADMA];
KASSERT(flind >= 0,
("vm_phys_init: ISADMA flind < 0"));
} else
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_LOWMEM
if (seg->end <= VM_LOWMEM_BOUNDARY) {
flind = vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_LOWMEM];
KASSERT(flind >= 0,
("vm_phys_init: LOWMEM flind < 0"));
} else
#endif
#ifdef VM_FREELIST_DMA32
if (seg->end <= VM_DMA32_BOUNDARY) {
flind = vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_DMA32];
KASSERT(flind >= 0,
("vm_phys_init: DMA32 flind < 0"));
} else
#endif
{
flind = vm_freelist_to_flind[VM_FREELIST_DEFAULT];
KASSERT(flind >= 0,
("vm_phys_init: DEFAULT flind < 0"));
}
seg->free_queues = &vm_phys_free_queues[seg->domain][flind];
}
/*
* Initialize the free queues.
*/
for (dom = 0; dom < vm_ndomains; dom++) {
for (flind = 0; flind < vm_nfreelists; flind++) {
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++) {
fl = vm_phys_free_queues[dom][flind][pind];
for (oind = 0; oind < VM_NFREEORDER; oind++)
TAILQ_INIT(&fl[oind].pl);
}
}
}
rw_init(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock, "vmfctr");
}
/*
* Split a contiguous, power of two-sized set of physical pages.
*/
static __inline void
vm_phys_split_pages(vm_page_t m, int oind, struct vm_freelist *fl, int order)
{
vm_page_t m_buddy;
while (oind > order) {
oind--;
m_buddy = &m[1 << oind];
KASSERT(m_buddy->order == VM_NFREEORDER,
("vm_phys_split_pages: page %p has unexpected order %d",
m_buddy, m_buddy->order));
vm_freelist_add(fl, m_buddy, oind, 0);
}
}
/*
* Initialize a physical page in preparation for adding it to the free
* lists.
*/
void
vm_phys_init_page(vm_paddr_t pa)
{
vm_page_t m;
m = vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page(pa);
m->object = NULL;
m->wire_count = 0;
m->busy_lock = VPB_UNBUSIED;
m->hold_count = 0;
m->flags = m->aflags = m->oflags = 0;
m->phys_addr = pa;
m->queue = PQ_NONE;
m->psind = 0;
m->segind = vm_phys_paddr_to_segind(pa);
m->order = VM_NFREEORDER;
m->pool = VM_FREEPOOL_DEFAULT;
m->valid = m->dirty = 0;
pmap_page_init(m);
}
/*
* Allocate a contiguous, power of two-sized set of physical pages
* from the free lists.
*
* The free page queues must be locked.
*/
vm_page_t
vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order)
{
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
vm_page_t m;
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
int domain, flind;
struct vm_domain_iterator vi;
KASSERT(pool < VM_NFREEPOOL,
("vm_phys_alloc_pages: pool %d is out of range", pool));
KASSERT(order < VM_NFREEORDER,
("vm_phys_alloc_pages: order %d is out of range", order));
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
vm_policy_iterator_init(&vi);
while ((vm_domain_iterator_run(&vi, &domain)) == 0) {
for (flind = 0; flind < vm_nfreelists; flind++) {
m = vm_phys_alloc_domain_pages(domain, flind, pool,
order);
if (m != NULL)
return (m);
}
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
}
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
vm_policy_iterator_finish(&vi);
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
return (NULL);
}
/*
* Allocate a contiguous, power of two-sized set of physical pages from the
* specified free list. The free list must be specified using one of the
* manifest constants VM_FREELIST_*.
*
* The free page queues must be locked.
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
*/
vm_page_t
vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int freelist, int pool, int order)
{
vm_page_t m;
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
struct vm_domain_iterator vi;
int domain;
KASSERT(freelist < VM_NFREELIST,
("vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages: freelist %d is out of range",
freelist));
KASSERT(pool < VM_NFREEPOOL,
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
("vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages: pool %d is out of range", pool));
KASSERT(order < VM_NFREEORDER,
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
("vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages: order %d is out of range", order));
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
vm_policy_iterator_init(&vi);
while ((vm_domain_iterator_run(&vi, &domain)) == 0) {
m = vm_phys_alloc_domain_pages(domain,
vm_freelist_to_flind[freelist], pool, order);
if (m != NULL)
return (m);
}
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
vm_policy_iterator_finish(&vi);
return (NULL);
}
static vm_page_t
vm_phys_alloc_domain_pages(int domain, int flind, int pool, int order)
{
struct vm_freelist *fl;
struct vm_freelist *alt;
int oind, pind;
vm_page_t m;
mtx_assert(&vm_page_queue_free_mtx, MA_OWNED);
fl = &vm_phys_free_queues[domain][flind][pool][0];
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
for (oind = order; oind < VM_NFREEORDER; oind++) {
m = TAILQ_FIRST(&fl[oind].pl);
if (m != NULL) {
vm_freelist_rem(fl, m, oind);
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
vm_phys_split_pages(m, oind, fl, order);
return (m);
}
}
/*
* The given pool was empty. Find the largest
* contiguous, power-of-two-sized set of pages in any
* pool. Transfer these pages to the given pool, and
* use them to satisfy the allocation.
*/
for (oind = VM_NFREEORDER - 1; oind >= order; oind--) {
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++) {
alt = &vm_phys_free_queues[domain][flind][pind][0];
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
m = TAILQ_FIRST(&alt[oind].pl);
if (m != NULL) {
vm_freelist_rem(alt, m, oind);
Redo the page table page allocation on MIPS, as suggested by alc@. The UMA zone based allocation is replaced by a scheme that creates a new free page list for the KSEG0 region, and a new function in sys/vm that allocates pages from a specific free page list. This also fixes a race condition introduced by the UMA based page table page allocation code. Dropping the page queue and pmap locks before the call to uma_zfree, and re-acquiring them afterwards will introduce a race condtion(noted by alc@). The changes are : - Revert the earlier changes in MIPS pmap.c that added UMA zone for page table pages. - Add a new freelist VM_FREELIST_HIGHMEM to MIPS vmparam.h for memory that is not directly mapped (in 32bit kernel). Normal page allocations will first try the HIGHMEM freelist and then the default(direct mapped) freelist. - Add a new function 'vm_page_t vm_page_alloc_freelist(int flind, int order, int req)' to vm/vm_page.c to allocate a page from a specified freelist. The MIPS page table pages will be allocated using this function from the freelist containing direct mapped pages. - Move the page initialization code from vm_phys_alloc_contig() to a new function vm_page_alloc_init(), and use this function to initialize pages in vm_page_alloc_freelist() too. - Split the function vm_phys_alloc_pages(int pool, int order) to create vm_phys_alloc_freelist_pages(int flind, int pool, int order), and use this function from both vm_page_alloc_freelist() and vm_phys_alloc_pages(). Reviewed by: alc
2010-07-21 09:27:00 +00:00
vm_phys_set_pool(pool, m, oind);
vm_phys_split_pages(m, oind, fl, order);
return (m);
}
}
}
return (NULL);
}
/*
* Find the vm_page corresponding to the given physical address.
*/
vm_page_t
vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page(vm_paddr_t pa)
{
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
int segind;
for (segind = 0; segind < vm_phys_nsegs; segind++) {
seg = &vm_phys_segs[segind];
if (pa >= seg->start && pa < seg->end)
return (&seg->first_page[atop(pa - seg->start)]);
}
return (NULL);
}
vm_page_t
vm_phys_fictitious_to_vm_page(vm_paddr_t pa)
{
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg tmp, *seg;
vm_page_t m;
m = NULL;
tmp.start = pa;
tmp.end = 0;
rw_rlock(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock);
seg = RB_FIND(fict_tree, &vm_phys_fictitious_tree, &tmp);
rw_runlock(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock);
if (seg == NULL)
return (NULL);
m = &seg->first_page[atop(pa - seg->start)];
KASSERT((m->flags & PG_FICTITIOUS) != 0, ("%p not fictitious", m));
return (m);
}
static inline void
vm_phys_fictitious_init_range(vm_page_t range, vm_paddr_t start,
long page_count, vm_memattr_t memattr)
{
long i;
bzero(range, page_count * sizeof(*range));
for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
vm_page_initfake(&range[i], start + PAGE_SIZE * i, memattr);
range[i].oflags &= ~VPO_UNMANAGED;
range[i].busy_lock = VPB_UNBUSIED;
}
}
int
vm_phys_fictitious_reg_range(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end,
vm_memattr_t memattr)
{
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *seg;
vm_page_t fp;
long page_count;
#ifdef VM_PHYSSEG_DENSE
long pi, pe;
long dpage_count;
#endif
KASSERT(start < end,
("Start of segment isn't less than end (start: %jx end: %jx)",
(uintmax_t)start, (uintmax_t)end));
page_count = (end - start) / PAGE_SIZE;
#ifdef VM_PHYSSEG_DENSE
pi = atop(start);
pe = atop(end);
if (pi >= first_page && (pi - first_page) < vm_page_array_size) {
fp = &vm_page_array[pi - first_page];
if ((pe - first_page) > vm_page_array_size) {
/*
* We have a segment that starts inside
* of vm_page_array, but ends outside of it.
*
* Use vm_page_array pages for those that are
* inside of the vm_page_array range, and
* allocate the remaining ones.
*/
dpage_count = vm_page_array_size - (pi - first_page);
vm_phys_fictitious_init_range(fp, start, dpage_count,
memattr);
page_count -= dpage_count;
start += ptoa(dpage_count);
goto alloc;
}
/*
* We can allocate the full range from vm_page_array,
* so there's no need to register the range in the tree.
*/
vm_phys_fictitious_init_range(fp, start, page_count, memattr);
return (0);
} else if (pe > first_page && (pe - first_page) < vm_page_array_size) {
/*
* We have a segment that ends inside of vm_page_array,
* but starts outside of it.
*/
fp = &vm_page_array[0];
dpage_count = pe - first_page;
vm_phys_fictitious_init_range(fp, ptoa(first_page), dpage_count,
memattr);
end -= ptoa(dpage_count);
page_count -= dpage_count;
goto alloc;
} else if (pi < first_page && pe > (first_page + vm_page_array_size)) {
/*
* Trying to register a fictitious range that expands before
* and after vm_page_array.
*/
return (EINVAL);
} else {
alloc:
#endif
fp = malloc(page_count * sizeof(struct vm_page), M_FICT_PAGES,
M_WAITOK);
#ifdef VM_PHYSSEG_DENSE
}
#endif
vm_phys_fictitious_init_range(fp, start, page_count, memattr);
seg = malloc(sizeof(*seg), M_FICT_PAGES, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO);
seg->start = start;
seg->end = end;
seg->first_page = fp;
rw_wlock(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock);
RB_INSERT(fict_tree, &vm_phys_fictitious_tree, seg);
rw_wunlock(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock);
return (0);
}
void
vm_phys_fictitious_unreg_range(vm_paddr_t start, vm_paddr_t end)
{
struct vm_phys_fictitious_seg *seg, tmp;
#ifdef VM_PHYSSEG_DENSE
long pi, pe;
#endif
KASSERT(start < end,
("Start of segment isn't less than end (start: %jx end: %jx)",
(uintmax_t)start, (uintmax_t)end));
#ifdef VM_PHYSSEG_DENSE
pi = atop(start);
pe = atop(end);
if (pi >= first_page && (pi - first_page) < vm_page_array_size) {
if ((pe - first_page) <= vm_page_array_size) {
/*
* This segment was allocated using vm_page_array
* only, there's nothing to do since those pages
* were never added to the tree.
*/
return;
}
/*
* We have a segment that starts inside
* of vm_page_array, but ends outside of it.
*
* Calculate how many pages were added to the
* tree and free them.
*/
start = ptoa(first_page + vm_page_array_size);
} else if (pe > first_page && (pe - first_page) < vm_page_array_size) {
/*
* We have a segment that ends inside of vm_page_array,
* but starts outside of it.
*/
end = ptoa(first_page);
} else if (pi < first_page && pe > (first_page + vm_page_array_size)) {
/* Since it's not possible to register such a range, panic. */
panic(
"Unregistering not registered fictitious range [%#jx:%#jx]",
(uintmax_t)start, (uintmax_t)end);
}
#endif
tmp.start = start;
tmp.end = 0;
rw_wlock(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock);
seg = RB_FIND(fict_tree, &vm_phys_fictitious_tree, &tmp);
if (seg->start != start || seg->end != end) {
rw_wunlock(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock);
panic(
"Unregistering not registered fictitious range [%#jx:%#jx]",
(uintmax_t)start, (uintmax_t)end);
}
RB_REMOVE(fict_tree, &vm_phys_fictitious_tree, seg);
rw_wunlock(&vm_phys_fictitious_reg_lock);
free(seg->first_page, M_FICT_PAGES);
free(seg, M_FICT_PAGES);
}
/*
* Find the segment containing the given physical address.
*/
static int
vm_phys_paddr_to_segind(vm_paddr_t pa)
{
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
int segind;
for (segind = 0; segind < vm_phys_nsegs; segind++) {
seg = &vm_phys_segs[segind];
if (pa >= seg->start && pa < seg->end)
return (segind);
}
panic("vm_phys_paddr_to_segind: paddr %#jx is not in any segment" ,
(uintmax_t)pa);
}
/*
* Free a contiguous, power of two-sized set of physical pages.
*
* The free page queues must be locked.
*/
void
vm_phys_free_pages(vm_page_t m, int order)
{
struct vm_freelist *fl;
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
vm_paddr_t pa;
vm_page_t m_buddy;
KASSERT(m->order == VM_NFREEORDER,
("vm_phys_free_pages: page %p has unexpected order %d",
m, m->order));
KASSERT(m->pool < VM_NFREEPOOL,
("vm_phys_free_pages: page %p has unexpected pool %d",
m, m->pool));
KASSERT(order < VM_NFREEORDER,
("vm_phys_free_pages: order %d is out of range", order));
mtx_assert(&vm_page_queue_free_mtx, MA_OWNED);
seg = &vm_phys_segs[m->segind];
if (order < VM_NFREEORDER - 1) {
pa = VM_PAGE_TO_PHYS(m);
do {
pa ^= ((vm_paddr_t)1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + order));
if (pa < seg->start || pa >= seg->end)
break;
m_buddy = &seg->first_page[atop(pa - seg->start)];
if (m_buddy->order != order)
break;
fl = (*seg->free_queues)[m_buddy->pool];
vm_freelist_rem(fl, m_buddy, order);
if (m_buddy->pool != m->pool)
vm_phys_set_pool(m->pool, m_buddy, order);
order++;
pa &= ~(((vm_paddr_t)1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + order)) - 1);
m = &seg->first_page[atop(pa - seg->start)];
} while (order < VM_NFREEORDER - 1);
}
fl = (*seg->free_queues)[m->pool];
vm_freelist_add(fl, m, order, 1);
}
/*
* Free a contiguous, arbitrarily sized set of physical pages.
*
* The free page queues must be locked.
*/
void
vm_phys_free_contig(vm_page_t m, u_long npages)
{
u_int n;
int order;
/*
* Avoid unnecessary coalescing by freeing the pages in the largest
* possible power-of-two-sized subsets.
*/
mtx_assert(&vm_page_queue_free_mtx, MA_OWNED);
for (;; npages -= n) {
/*
* Unsigned "min" is used here so that "order" is assigned
* "VM_NFREEORDER - 1" when "m"'s physical address is zero
* or the low-order bits of its physical address are zero
* because the size of a physical address exceeds the size of
* a long.
*/
order = min(ffsl(VM_PAGE_TO_PHYS(m) >> PAGE_SHIFT) - 1,
VM_NFREEORDER - 1);
n = 1 << order;
if (npages < n)
break;
vm_phys_free_pages(m, order);
m += n;
}
/* The residual "npages" is less than "1 << (VM_NFREEORDER - 1)". */
for (; npages > 0; npages -= n) {
order = flsl(npages) - 1;
n = 1 << order;
vm_phys_free_pages(m, order);
m += n;
}
}
/*
* Scan physical memory between the specified addresses "low" and "high" for a
* run of contiguous physical pages that satisfy the specified conditions, and
* return the lowest page in the run. The specified "alignment" determines
* the alignment of the lowest physical page in the run. If the specified
* "boundary" is non-zero, then the run of physical pages cannot span a
* physical address that is a multiple of "boundary".
*
* "npages" must be greater than zero. Both "alignment" and "boundary" must
* be a power of two.
*/
vm_page_t
vm_phys_scan_contig(u_long npages, vm_paddr_t low, vm_paddr_t high,
u_long alignment, vm_paddr_t boundary, int options)
{
vm_paddr_t pa_end;
vm_page_t m_end, m_run, m_start;
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
int segind;
KASSERT(npages > 0, ("npages is 0"));
KASSERT(powerof2(alignment), ("alignment is not a power of 2"));
KASSERT(powerof2(boundary), ("boundary is not a power of 2"));
if (low >= high)
return (NULL);
for (segind = 0; segind < vm_phys_nsegs; segind++) {
seg = &vm_phys_segs[segind];
if (seg->start >= high)
break;
if (low >= seg->end)
continue;
if (low <= seg->start)
m_start = seg->first_page;
else
m_start = &seg->first_page[atop(low - seg->start)];
if (high < seg->end)
pa_end = high;
else
pa_end = seg->end;
if (pa_end - VM_PAGE_TO_PHYS(m_start) < ptoa(npages))
continue;
m_end = &seg->first_page[atop(pa_end - seg->start)];
m_run = vm_page_scan_contig(npages, m_start, m_end,
alignment, boundary, options);
if (m_run != NULL)
return (m_run);
}
return (NULL);
}
/*
* Set the pool for a contiguous, power of two-sized set of physical pages.
*/
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
void
vm_phys_set_pool(int pool, vm_page_t m, int order)
{
vm_page_t m_tmp;
for (m_tmp = m; m_tmp < &m[1 << order]; m_tmp++)
m_tmp->pool = pool;
}
/*
* Search for the given physical page "m" in the free lists. If the search
* succeeds, remove "m" from the free lists and return TRUE. Otherwise, return
* FALSE, indicating that "m" is not in the free lists.
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
*
* The free page queues must be locked.
*/
boolean_t
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
vm_phys_unfree_page(vm_page_t m)
{
struct vm_freelist *fl;
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
vm_paddr_t pa, pa_half;
vm_page_t m_set, m_tmp;
int order;
mtx_assert(&vm_page_queue_free_mtx, MA_OWNED);
/*
* First, find the contiguous, power of two-sized set of free
* physical pages containing the given physical page "m" and
* assign it to "m_set".
*/
seg = &vm_phys_segs[m->segind];
for (m_set = m, order = 0; m_set->order == VM_NFREEORDER &&
order < VM_NFREEORDER - 1; ) {
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
order++;
pa = m->phys_addr & (~(vm_paddr_t)0 << (PAGE_SHIFT + order));
if (pa >= seg->start)
m_set = &seg->first_page[atop(pa - seg->start)];
else
return (FALSE);
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
}
if (m_set->order < order)
return (FALSE);
if (m_set->order == VM_NFREEORDER)
return (FALSE);
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
KASSERT(m_set->order < VM_NFREEORDER,
("vm_phys_unfree_page: page %p has unexpected order %d",
m_set, m_set->order));
/*
* Next, remove "m_set" from the free lists. Finally, extract
* "m" from "m_set" using an iterative algorithm: While "m_set"
* is larger than a page, shrink "m_set" by returning the half
* of "m_set" that does not contain "m" to the free lists.
*/
fl = (*seg->free_queues)[m_set->pool];
order = m_set->order;
vm_freelist_rem(fl, m_set, order);
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
while (order > 0) {
order--;
pa_half = m_set->phys_addr ^ (1 << (PAGE_SHIFT + order));
if (m->phys_addr < pa_half)
m_tmp = &seg->first_page[atop(pa_half - seg->start)];
else {
m_tmp = m_set;
m_set = &seg->first_page[atop(pa_half - seg->start)];
}
vm_freelist_add(fl, m_tmp, order, 0);
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
}
KASSERT(m_set == m, ("vm_phys_unfree_page: fatal inconsistency"));
return (TRUE);
Change the management of cached pages (PQ_CACHE) in two fundamental ways: (1) Cached pages are no longer kept in the object's resident page splay tree and memq. Instead, they are kept in a separate per-object splay tree of cached pages. However, access to this new per-object splay tree is synchronized by the _free_ page queues lock, not to be confused with the heavily contended page queues lock. Consequently, a cached page can be reclaimed by vm_page_alloc(9) without acquiring the object's lock or the page queues lock. This solves a problem independently reported by tegge@ and Isilon. Specifically, they observed the page daemon consuming a great deal of CPU time because of pages bouncing back and forth between the cache queue (PQ_CACHE) and the inactive queue (PQ_INACTIVE). The source of this problem turned out to be a deadlock avoidance strategy employed when selecting a cached page to reclaim in vm_page_select_cache(). However, the root cause was really that reclaiming a cached page required the acquisition of an object lock while the page queues lock was already held. Thus, this change addresses the problem at its root, by eliminating the need to acquire the object's lock. Moreover, keeping cached pages in the object's primary splay tree and memq was, in effect, optimizing for the uncommon case. Cached pages are reclaimed far, far more often than they are reactivated. Instead, this change makes reclamation cheaper, especially in terms of synchronization overhead, and reactivation more expensive, because reactivated pages will have to be reentered into the object's primary splay tree and memq. (2) Cached pages are now stored alongside free pages in the physical memory allocator's buddy queues, increasing the likelihood that large allocations of contiguous physical memory (i.e., superpages) will succeed. Finally, as a result of this change long-standing restrictions on when and where a cached page can be reclaimed and returned by vm_page_alloc(9) are eliminated. Specifically, calls to vm_page_alloc(9) specifying VM_ALLOC_INTERRUPT can now reclaim and return a formerly cached page. Consequently, a call to malloc(9) specifying M_NOWAIT is less likely to fail. Discussed with: many over the course of the summer, including jeff@, Justin Husted @ Isilon, peter@, tegge@ Tested by: an earlier version by kris@ Approved by: re (kensmith)
2007-09-25 06:25:06 +00:00
}
/*
2007-06-16 05:25:53 +00:00
* Allocate a contiguous set of physical pages of the given size
* "npages" from the free lists. All of the physical pages must be at
* or above the given physical address "low" and below the given
* physical address "high". The given value "alignment" determines the
* alignment of the first physical page in the set. If the given value
* "boundary" is non-zero, then the set of physical pages cannot cross
* any physical address boundary that is a multiple of that value. Both
* "alignment" and "boundary" must be a power of two.
*/
vm_page_t
vm_phys_alloc_contig(u_long npages, vm_paddr_t low, vm_paddr_t high,
u_long alignment, vm_paddr_t boundary)
{
vm_paddr_t pa_end, pa_start;
vm_page_t m_run;
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
struct vm_domain_iterator vi;
struct vm_phys_seg *seg;
int domain, segind;
KASSERT(npages > 0, ("npages is 0"));
KASSERT(powerof2(alignment), ("alignment is not a power of 2"));
KASSERT(powerof2(boundary), ("boundary is not a power of 2"));
mtx_assert(&vm_page_queue_free_mtx, MA_OWNED);
if (low >= high)
return (NULL);
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
vm_policy_iterator_init(&vi);
restartdom:
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
if (vm_domain_iterator_run(&vi, &domain) != 0) {
vm_policy_iterator_finish(&vi);
return (NULL);
}
m_run = NULL;
for (segind = vm_phys_nsegs - 1; segind >= 0; segind--) {
seg = &vm_phys_segs[segind];
if (seg->start >= high || seg->domain != domain)
continue;
if (low >= seg->end)
break;
if (low <= seg->start)
pa_start = seg->start;
else
pa_start = low;
if (high < seg->end)
pa_end = high;
else
pa_end = seg->end;
if (pa_end - pa_start < ptoa(npages))
continue;
m_run = vm_phys_alloc_seg_contig(seg, npages, low, high,
alignment, boundary);
if (m_run != NULL)
break;
}
if (m_run == NULL && !vm_domain_iterator_isdone(&vi))
goto restartdom;
vm_policy_iterator_finish(&vi);
return (m_run);
}
Add an initial NUMA affinity/policy configuration for threads and processes. This is based on work done by jeff@ and jhb@, as well as the numa.diff patch that has been circulating when someone asks for first-touch NUMA on -10 or -11. * Introduce a simple set of VM policy and iterator types. * tie the policy types into the vm_phys path for now, mirroring how the initial first-touch allocation work was enabled. * add syscalls to control changing thread and process defaults. * add a global NUMA VM domain policy. * implement a simple cascade policy order - if a thread policy exists, use it; if a process policy exists, use it; use the default policy. * processes inherit policies from their parent processes, threads inherit policies from their parent threads. * add a simple tool (numactl) to query and modify default thread/process policities. * add documentation for the new syscalls, for numa and for numactl. * re-enable first touch NUMA again by default, as now policies can be set in a variety of methods. This is only relevant for very specific workloads. This doesn't pretend to be a final NUMA solution. The previous defaults in -HEAD (with MAXMEMDOM set) can be achieved by 'sysctl vm.default_policy=rr'. This is only relevant if MAXMEMDOM is set to something other than 1. Ie, if you're using GENERIC or a modified kernel with non-NUMA, then this is a glorified no-op for you. Thank you to Norse Corp for giving me access to rather large (for FreeBSD!) NUMA machines in order to develop and verify this. Thank you to Dell for providing me with dual socket sandybridge and westmere v3 hardware to do NUMA development with. Thank you to Scott Long at Netflix for providing me with access to the two-socket, four-domain haswell v3 hardware. Thank you to Peter Holm for running the stress testing suite against the NUMA branch during various stages of development! Tested: * MIPS (regression testing; non-NUMA) * i386 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * amd64 (regression testing; non-NUMA GENERIC) * westmere, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * sandy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou dell!) * ivy bridge, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * westmere-EX, 4 socket / 1TB RAM (thankyou norse!) * haswell, 2 socket (thankyou norse!) * haswell v3, 2 socket (thankyou dell) * haswell v3, 2x18 core (thankyou scott long / netflix!) * Peter Holm ran a stress test suite on this work and found one issue, but has not been able to verify it (it doesn't look NUMA related, and he only saw it once over many testing runs.) * I've tested bhyve instances running in fixed NUMA domains and cpusets; all seems to work correctly. Verified: * intel-pcm - pcm-numa.x and pcm-memory.x, whilst selecting different NUMA policies for processes under test. Review: This was reviewed through phabricator (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2559) as well as privately and via emails to freebsd-arch@. The git history with specific attributes is available at https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/ in the NUMA branch (https://github.com/erikarn/freebsd/compare/local/adrian_numa_policy). This has been reviewed by a number of people (stas, rpaulo, kib, ngie, wblock) but not achieved a clear consensus. My hope is that with further exposure and testing more functionality can be implemented and evaluated. Notes: * The VM doesn't handle unbalanced domains very well, and if you have an overly unbalanced memory setup whilst under high memory pressure, VM page allocation may fail leading to a kernel panic. This was a problem in the past, but it's much more easily triggered now with these tools. * This work only controls the path through vm_phys; it doesn't yet strongly/predictably affect contigmalloc, KVA placement, UMA, etc. So, driver placement of memory isn't really guaranteed in any way. That's next on my plate. Sponsored by: Norse Corp, Inc.; Dell
2015-07-11 15:21:37 +00:00
/*
* Allocate a run of contiguous physical pages from the free list for the
* specified segment.
*/
static vm_page_t
vm_phys_alloc_seg_contig(struct vm_phys_seg *seg, u_long npages,
vm_paddr_t low, vm_paddr_t high, u_long alignment, vm_paddr_t boundary)
{
struct vm_freelist *fl;
vm_paddr_t pa, pa_end, size;
vm_page_t m, m_ret;
u_long npages_end;
int oind, order, pind;
KASSERT(npages > 0, ("npages is 0"));
KASSERT(powerof2(alignment), ("alignment is not a power of 2"));
KASSERT(powerof2(boundary), ("boundary is not a power of 2"));
mtx_assert(&vm_page_queue_free_mtx, MA_OWNED);
/* Compute the queue that is the best fit for npages. */
for (order = 0; (1 << order) < npages; order++);
/* Search for a run satisfying the specified conditions. */
size = npages << PAGE_SHIFT;
for (oind = min(order, VM_NFREEORDER - 1); oind < VM_NFREEORDER;
oind++) {
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++) {
fl = (*seg->free_queues)[pind];
TAILQ_FOREACH(m_ret, &fl[oind].pl, plinks.q) {
/*
* Is the size of this allocation request
* larger than the largest block size?
*/
if (order >= VM_NFREEORDER) {
/*
* Determine if a sufficient number of
* subsequent blocks to satisfy the
* allocation request are free.
*/
pa = VM_PAGE_TO_PHYS(m_ret);
pa_end = pa + size;
for (;;) {
pa += 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT +
VM_NFREEORDER - 1);
if (pa >= pa_end ||
pa < seg->start ||
pa >= seg->end)
break;
m = &seg->first_page[atop(pa -
seg->start)];
if (m->order != VM_NFREEORDER -
1)
break;
}
/* If not, go to the next block. */
if (pa < pa_end)
continue;
}
/*
* Determine if the blocks are within the
* given range, satisfy the given alignment,
* and do not cross the given boundary.
*/
pa = VM_PAGE_TO_PHYS(m_ret);
pa_end = pa + size;
if (pa >= low && pa_end <= high &&
(pa & (alignment - 1)) == 0 &&
rounddown2(pa ^ (pa_end - 1), boundary) == 0)
goto done;
}
}
}
return (NULL);
done:
for (m = m_ret; m < &m_ret[npages]; m = &m[1 << oind]) {
fl = (*seg->free_queues)[m->pool];
vm_freelist_rem(fl, m, m->order);
}
if (m_ret->pool != VM_FREEPOOL_DEFAULT)
vm_phys_set_pool(VM_FREEPOOL_DEFAULT, m_ret, oind);
fl = (*seg->free_queues)[m_ret->pool];
vm_phys_split_pages(m_ret, oind, fl, order);
/* Return excess pages to the free lists. */
npages_end = roundup2(npages, 1 << imin(oind, order));
if (npages < npages_end)
vm_phys_free_contig(&m_ret[npages], npages_end - npages);
return (m_ret);
}
#ifdef DDB
/*
* Show the number of physical pages in each of the free lists.
*/
DB_SHOW_COMMAND(freepages, db_show_freepages)
{
struct vm_freelist *fl;
int flind, oind, pind, dom;
for (dom = 0; dom < vm_ndomains; dom++) {
db_printf("DOMAIN: %d\n", dom);
for (flind = 0; flind < vm_nfreelists; flind++) {
db_printf("FREE LIST %d:\n"
"\n ORDER (SIZE) | NUMBER"
"\n ", flind);
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++)
db_printf(" | POOL %d", pind);
db_printf("\n-- ");
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++)
db_printf("-- -- ");
db_printf("--\n");
for (oind = VM_NFREEORDER - 1; oind >= 0; oind--) {
db_printf(" %2.2d (%6.6dK)", oind,
1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10 + oind));
for (pind = 0; pind < VM_NFREEPOOL; pind++) {
fl = vm_phys_free_queues[dom][flind][pind];
db_printf(" | %6.6d", fl[oind].lcnt);
}
db_printf("\n");
}
db_printf("\n");
}
db_printf("\n");
}
}
#endif