2002-02-18 01:28:01 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" Copyright (c) 2001, 2002 Networks Associates Technology, Inc.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
.\" are met:
|
|
|
|
.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
.\" notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
.\" documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
2002-02-18 01:28:01 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" 3. The names of the authors may not be used to endorse or promote
|
|
|
|
.\" products derived from this software without specific prior written
|
|
|
|
.\" permission.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
|
|
|
|
.\" ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
.\" IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
.\" ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
|
|
|
|
.\" FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
|
|
|
|
.\" DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
|
|
|
|
.\" OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
|
|
|
|
.\" HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
.\" LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
.\" OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
|
|
|
|
.\" SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
2002-01-17 23:08:43 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" $Id: sec-doc.7,v 1.7 2001/12/22 00:14:12 rwatson Exp$
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" $FreeBSD$
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.Dd October 12, 2001
|
|
|
|
.Dt SEC-DOC 7
|
|
|
|
.Os
|
|
|
|
.Sh NAME
|
|
|
|
.Nm sec-doc
|
|
|
|
.Nd guide to adding security considerations sections to manual pages
|
|
|
|
.Sh DESCRIPTION
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
This document presents guidelines for
|
|
|
|
adding security considerations sections to manual pages.
|
|
|
|
It provides two typical examples.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
The guidelines for writing
|
|
|
|
.Fx
|
|
|
|
manual pages in
|
|
|
|
.Xr groff_mdoc 7
|
|
|
|
mandate that each manual page describing a feature of the
|
|
|
|
.Fx
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
system should contain a security considerations section
|
|
|
|
describing what security requirements can be broken
|
|
|
|
through the misuse of that feature.
|
|
|
|
When writing these sections, authors should attempt to
|
|
|
|
achieve a happy medium between two conflicting goals:
|
|
|
|
brevity and completeness.
|
|
|
|
On one hand, security consideration sections must not be too verbose,
|
|
|
|
or busy readers might be dissuaded from reading them.
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, security consideration sections must not be incomplete,
|
|
|
|
or they will fail in their purpose of
|
|
|
|
instructing the reader on how to avoid all insecure uses.
|
|
|
|
This document provides guidelines for balancing brevity and completeness
|
|
|
|
in the security consideration section for a given feature of the
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Fx
|
|
|
|
system.
|
2002-01-01 19:20:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Ss Where to Start
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Begin by listing
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
those general security requirements that can be violated
|
|
|
|
through the misuse of the feature.
|
|
|
|
As described in
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FreeBSD Security Architecture (FSA),
|
|
|
|
there are four classes of security requirements:
|
|
|
|
.Bl -hang -offset indent
|
|
|
|
.It Em integrity
|
|
|
|
(example: non-administrators should not modify system binaries),
|
|
|
|
.It Em confidentiality
|
|
|
|
(example: non-administrators should not view the shadow password file),
|
|
|
|
.It Em availability
|
|
|
|
(example: the web server should respond to client requests in a timely
|
|
|
|
fashion), and
|
|
|
|
.It Em correctness
|
|
|
|
(example: the ps program should provide exactly the process table
|
|
|
|
information listing functionality described in its documentation - no more,
|
|
|
|
no less.)
|
|
|
|
.El
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
The FSA
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
contains a list of integrity, confidentiality, availability,
|
|
|
|
and correctness requirements for the base
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Fx
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
system.
|
|
|
|
Many commands, tools, and utilities
|
|
|
|
documented in sections 1, 6, and 8 of the manual
|
|
|
|
are partly responsible for meeting these base system requirements.
|
|
|
|
Consequently, borrowing entries from the list in
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FSA
|
|
|
|
is a good way to begin the list of requirements for these commands,
|
|
|
|
tools, and utilities.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
Complex servers and subsystems may have their own integrity,
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
confidentiality, availability and correctness requirements
|
|
|
|
in addition to the system-wide ones listed in
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FSA.
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
Listing these additional requirements will require
|
|
|
|
some thought and analysis.
|
|
|
|
Correctness requirements will most often
|
|
|
|
deal with configuration issues,
|
|
|
|
especially in cases of programs that can load modules
|
|
|
|
containing arbitrary functionality during run-time.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
For low-level features, such as the individual functions
|
|
|
|
documented in sections 2, 3, and 9 of the manual,
|
|
|
|
it is generally sufficient to proceed with
|
|
|
|
only a single correctness requirement:
|
|
|
|
simply that the function behaves as advertised.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
A good security considerations section
|
|
|
|
should explain how the feature can be misused
|
|
|
|
to violate each general security requirement in the list.
|
|
|
|
Each explanation should be accompanied by instructions
|
|
|
|
the reader should follow in order to avoid a violation.
|
|
|
|
For the sake of brevity, assume the reader is familiar with
|
|
|
|
all of the concepts in
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FSA.
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
When referencing potential vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
described in the Secure Programming Practices man page,
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr sprog 7 ,
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
likewise cross-reference that document
|
|
|
|
rather than replicating information.
|
|
|
|
Whenever possible, refer to this document
|
|
|
|
rather than reproducing the material it contains.
|
2002-01-01 19:20:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Ss Where to Stop
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
Security problems are often interrelated;
|
|
|
|
individual problems often have far-reaching implications.
|
|
|
|
For example, the correctness of virtually any dynamically-linked program
|
|
|
|
is dependent on the correct implementation and configuration
|
|
|
|
of the run-time linker.
|
|
|
|
The correctness of this program, in turn,
|
|
|
|
depends on the correctness of its libraries,
|
|
|
|
the compiler used to build it,
|
|
|
|
the correctness of the preceding compiler that was used to build that compiler,
|
|
|
|
and so on,
|
|
|
|
as described by Thompson (see
|
|
|
|
.Sx SEE ALSO ,
|
|
|
|
below).
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
Due to the need for brevity, security consideration sections
|
|
|
|
should describe only those issues directly related to the feature
|
|
|
|
that is the subject of the manual page.
|
|
|
|
Refer to other manual pages
|
|
|
|
rather than duplicating the material found there.
|
|
|
|
Refer to generalized descriptions of problems in
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FSA
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
rather than referring to specific instances of those problems
|
|
|
|
in other manual pages.
|
|
|
|
Ideally, each specific security-relevant issue
|
|
|
|
should be described in exactly one manual page,
|
|
|
|
preferably as a specific instance of a general problem
|
|
|
|
described in
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FSA.
|
|
|
|
.Sh EXAMPLES
|
|
|
|
Security considerations sections for most individual functions can follow
|
|
|
|
this simple formula:
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
.Bl -enum -offset indent -compact
|
|
|
|
.It
|
|
|
|
Provide one or two sentences describing each potential security
|
|
|
|
problem, referencing
|
|
|
|
the FSA
|
|
|
|
to provide details whenever possible.
|
|
|
|
.It
|
|
|
|
Provide one or two sentences describing how to avoid each potential
|
|
|
|
security problem.
|
|
|
|
.It
|
|
|
|
Provide a short example in code.
|
|
|
|
.El
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
This is an example security considerations section for the
|
|
|
|
.Xr strcpy 3
|
|
|
|
manual page:
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
|
.Fn strcpy
|
|
|
|
function is easily misused in a manner which enables malicious users
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
to arbitrarily change a running program's functionality
|
|
|
|
through a buffer overflow attack.
|
|
|
|
(See
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FSA.)
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
Avoid using
|
|
|
|
.Fn strcpy .
|
|
|
|
Instead, use
|
|
|
|
.Fn strncpy
|
|
|
|
and ensure that no more characters are copied to the destination buffer
|
|
|
|
than it can hold.
|
2002-01-06 20:28:27 +00:00
|
|
|
Do not forget to NUL-terminate the destination buffer,
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
as
|
|
|
|
.Fn strncpy
|
|
|
|
will not terminate the destination string if it is truncated.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
Note that
|
|
|
|
.Fn strncpy
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
can also be problematic.
|
|
|
|
It may be a security concern for a string to be truncated at all.
|
|
|
|
Since the truncated string will not be as long as the original,
|
|
|
|
it may refer to a completely different resource
|
|
|
|
and usage of the truncated resource
|
|
|
|
could result in very incorrect behavior.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
.Bd -literal
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
foo(const char *arbitrary_string)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char onstack[8];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if defined(BAD)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2002-01-06 20:28:27 +00:00
|
|
|
* This first strcpy is bad behavior. Do not use strcpy()!
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
(void)strcpy(onstack, arbitrary_string); /* BAD! */
|
|
|
|
#elif defined(BETTER)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The following two lines demonstrate better use of
|
|
|
|
* strncpy().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
(void)strncpy(onstack, arbitrary_string, sizeof(onstack) - 1);
|
|
|
|
onstack[sizeof(onstack - 1)] = '\\0';
|
|
|
|
#elif defined(BEST)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* These lines are even more robust due to testing for
|
|
|
|
* truncation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (strlen(arbitrary_string) + 1 > sizeof(onstack))
|
|
|
|
err(1, "onstack would be truncated");
|
|
|
|
(void)strncpy(onstack, arbitrary_string, sizeof(onstack));
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
.Ed
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
Security considerations sections for tools and commands
|
|
|
|
are apt to be less formulaic.
|
|
|
|
Let your list of potentially-violated security requirements
|
|
|
|
be your guide;
|
|
|
|
explain each one and list a solution in as concise a manner as possible.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
This is an example security considerations section for the
|
|
|
|
.Xr rtld 1
|
|
|
|
manual page:
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
Using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_PRELOAD environment variables,
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
malicious users can cause the dynamic linker
|
|
|
|
to link shared libraries of their own devising
|
|
|
|
into the address space of processes running non-set-user-ID/group-ID programs.
|
|
|
|
These shared libraries can arbitrarily change the functionality
|
|
|
|
of the program by replacing calls to standard library functions
|
|
|
|
with calls to their own.
|
|
|
|
Although this feature is disabled for set-user-ID and set-group-ID programs,
|
|
|
|
it can still be used to create Trojan horses in other programs.
|
|
|
|
(See
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the FSA.)
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
All users should be aware that the correct operation of non
|
|
|
|
set-user-ID/group-ID dynamically-linked programs depends on the proper
|
2001-12-30 20:34:53 +00:00
|
|
|
configuration of these environment variables,
|
|
|
|
and take care to avoid actions that might set them to values
|
|
|
|
which would cause the run-time linker
|
|
|
|
to link in shared libraries of unknown pedigree.
|
2001-12-22 22:07:02 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
.Xr groff_mdoc 7 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr security 7 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr sprog 7
|
|
|
|
.Rs
|
|
|
|
.%T "The FreeBSD Security Architecture"
|
|
|
|
.%J file:///usr/share/doc/{to be determined}
|
|
|
|
.Re
|
|
|
|
.Rs
|
|
|
|
.%A "Edward Amoroso, AT&T Bell Laboratories"
|
|
|
|
.%B "Fundamentals of Computer Security Technology"
|
|
|
|
.%I "P T R Prentice Hall"
|
|
|
|
.%D "1994"
|
|
|
|
.Re
|
|
|
|
.Rs
|
|
|
|
.%A "Ken Thompson"
|
|
|
|
.%T "Reflections on Trusting Trust"
|
|
|
|
.%J "Communications of the ACM"
|
|
|
|
.%I "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc."
|
|
|
|
.%P "761-763"
|
|
|
|
.%N "Vol. 27, No. 8"
|
|
|
|
.%D "August, 1984"
|
|
|
|
.Re
|
|
|
|
.Sh HISTORY
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
|
.Nm
|
|
|
|
manual page first appeared in
|
|
|
|
.Fx 5.0 .
|
|
|
|
.Sh AUTHORS
|
|
|
|
.An "Tim Fraser, NAI Labs CBOSS project." Aq tfraser@tislabs.com
|
|
|
|
.An "Brian Feldman, NAI Labs CBOSS project." Aq bfeldman@tislabs.com
|