18 lines
829 B
Plaintext
18 lines
829 B
Plaintext
|
Because of frequent questions ....... here is the BC FAQ
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1) Why does BC have its own arbitrary precision number routines
|
||
|
|
(found in lib/number.c) rather than using GMP?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
GMP has "integers" (no digits after a decimal), "rational numbers"
|
||
|
|
(stored as 2 integers) and "floats". None of these will correctly
|
||
|
|
represent a POSIX BC number. Floats are the closest, but will not
|
||
|
|
behave correctly for many computations. For example, BC numbers have
|
||
|
|
a "scale" that represent the number of digits to represent after the
|
||
|
|
decimal point. The multiplying two of these numbers requires one to
|
||
|
|
calculate an exact number of digits after the decimal point regardless
|
||
|
|
of the number of digits in the integer part. GMP floats have a
|
||
|
|
"fixed, but arbitrary" mantissa and so multiplying two floats will end
|
||
|
|
up dropping digits BC must calculate.
|
||
|
|
|