freebsd-skq/usr.sbin/makefs/tests/Makefile

# $FreeBSD$

ATF_TESTS_SH+=	makefs_cd9660_tests
ATF_TESTS_SH+=	makefs_ffs_tests

BINDIR=		${TESTSDIR}

# XXX: PACKAGE support for SCRIPTS
SCRIPTS+=	makefs_tests_common.sh
SCRIPTSNAME_makefs_tests_common.sh=	makefs_tests_common.sh

TEST_METADATA.makefs_cd9660_tests+=	required_files="/sbin/mount_cd9660"

.for t in ${ATF_TESTS_SH}
TEST_METADATA.$t+=	required_user="root"
.endfor

.include <bsd.test.mk>
Correctly reintroduce the rudimentary smoke tests I botched up in r289684 MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division 2015-10-22 05:32:45 +00:00			`# $FreeBSD$`

			`ATF_TESTS_SH+= makefs_cd9660_tests`
			`ATF_TESTS_SH+= makefs_ffs_tests`

			`BINDIR= ${TESTSDIR}`

Merge ^/user/ngie/release-pkg-fix-tests to unbreak how test files are installed after r298107 Summary of changes: - Replace all instances of FILES/TESTS with ${PACKAGE}FILES. This ensures that namespacing is kept with FILES appropriately, and that this shouldn't need to be repeated if the namespace changes -- only the definition of PACKAGE needs to be changed - Allow PACKAGE to be overridden by callers instead of forcing it to always be `tests`. In the event we get to the point where things can be split up enough in the base system, it would make more sense to group the tests with the blocks they're a part of, e.g. byacc with byacc-tests, etc - Remove PACKAGE definitions where possible, i.e. where FILES wasn't used previously. - Remove unnecessary TESTSPACKAGE definitions; this has been elided into bsd.tests.mk - Remove unnecessary BINDIRs used previously with ${PACKAGE}FILES; ${PACKAGE}FILESDIR is now automatically defined in bsd.test.mk. - Fix installation of files under data/ subdirectories in lib/libc/tests/hash and lib/libc/tests/net/getaddrinfo - Remove unnecessary .include <bsd.own.mk>s (some opportunistic cleanup) Document the proposed changes in share/examples/tests/tests/... via examples so it's clear that ${PACKAGES}FILES is the suggested way forward in terms of replacing FILES. share/mk/bsd.README didn't seem like the appropriate method of communicating that info. MFC after: never probably X-MFC with: r298107 PR: 209114 Relnotes: yes Tested with: buildworld, installworld, checkworld; buildworld, packageworld Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division 2016-05-04 23:20:53 +00:00			`# XXX: PACKAGE support for SCRIPTS`
Correctly reintroduce the rudimentary smoke tests I botched up in r289684 MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division 2015-10-22 05:32:45 +00:00			`SCRIPTS+= makefs_tests_common.sh`
			`SCRIPTSNAME_makefs_tests_common.sh= makefs_tests_common.sh`

Require /sbin/mount_cd9660 when running the cd9660 tests In some cases the test system might not have mount_cd9660(8). Don't implicitly rely on it while testing cd9660 support; explicitly rely on it MFC after: 1 week Reported by: mjohnston Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division 2016-01-27 06:14:20 +00:00			`TEST_METADATA.makefs_cd9660_tests+= required_files="/sbin/mount_cd9660"`

Correctly reintroduce the rudimentary smoke tests I botched up in r289684 MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division 2015-10-22 05:32:45 +00:00			`.for t in ${ATF_TESTS_SH}`
			`TEST_METADATA.$t+= required_user="root"`
			`.endfor`

			`.include <bsd.test.mk>`