d/freebsd-skq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
ebeb088c89
freebsd-skq/share/colldef/no_NO.ISO8859-15.src

43 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add collation sequence for no_NO. The same sequence applies to nb_NO and nn_NO, which are symlinked to no_NO. The patch in the PR contained a number of errors apparently based on (sometimes incorrect) pronunciation; for instance, v and w are distinct letters and should be collated in that order, even if they are pronounced the same, while <u:> should be collated with u, even though it is often mispronounced as y. For lack of a solid reference, I have taken sv_SE and simply changed the last three letters of the alphabet. PR: conf/51920 MFC after: 2 weeks
2008-07-28 21:33:34 +00:00
# Norwegian/ISO 8859-15 (backward compatible with ASCII)
#
# (Based on the Swedish sv_SE.ISO_8859-15)
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
charmap map.ISO8859-15
order \
# controls
<NU>;...;<US>;<PA>;...;<AC>;\
#
<NS>;<SP>;!;<!I>;\";<<<>;</>/>>;<Nb>;\
<Eu>;<Ct>;<DO>;<Pd>;<Ye>;\
%;&;';\(;\);*;+;<+->;<-:>;<*X>;\,;<-->;-;.;/;\
# digits
0;(1,<1S>);(2,<2S>);(3,<3S>);4;...;9;\
#
:;\;;\<;=;>;?;<?I>;<SE>;<PI>;<Co>;<Rg>;<At>;\
# capital
(A,<A'>,<A!>,<A/>>,<A?>);\
B;(C,<C,>);(D,<D->);(E,<E'>,<E!>,<E/>>,<E:>);\
F;G;H;(I,<I'>,<I!>,<I/>>,<I:>);\
J;...;M;(N,<N?>);(O,<O'>,<O!>,<O?>,<O/>>,<OE>);\
According to a proposed Norwegian standard for alphabetization of which I've obtained a draft, <u:> is indeed equivalent to u (to my surprise), and <th> sorts immediately after z. The correct ordering is algorithmic (based on the EOR) and can not be accurately represented as a table.
2008-07-30 15:37:13 +00:00
P;Q;R;(S,<S<>);T;(U,<U'>,<U!>,<U/>>);\
V;W;X;(Y,<Y'>,<Y:>,<U:>);(Z,<Z<>);\
Add collation sequence for no_NO. The same sequence applies to nb_NO and nn_NO, which are symlinked to no_NO. The patch in the PR contained a number of errors apparently based on (sometimes incorrect) pronunciation; for instance, v and w are distinct letters and should be collated in that order, even if they are pronounced the same, while <u:> should be collated with u, even though it is often mispronounced as y. For lack of a solid reference, I have taken sv_SE and simply changed the last three letters of the alphabet. PR: conf/51920 MFC after: 2 weeks
2008-07-28 21:33:34 +00:00
<TH>;\
According to a proposed Norwegian standard for alphabetization of which I've obtained a draft, <u:> is indeed equivalent to u (to my surprise), and <th> sorts immediately after z. The correct ordering is algorithmic (based on the EOR) and can not be accurately represented as a table.
2008-07-30 15:37:13 +00:00
(<AE>,<A:>);(<O//>,<O:>);<AA>;\
Add collation sequence for no_NO. The same sequence applies to nb_NO and nn_NO, which are symlinked to no_NO. The patch in the PR contained a number of errors apparently based on (sometimes incorrect) pronunciation; for instance, v and w are distinct letters and should be collated in that order, even if they are pronounced the same, while <u:> should be collated with u, even though it is often mispronounced as y. For lack of a solid reference, I have taken sv_SE and simply changed the last three letters of the alphabet. PR: conf/51920 MFC after: 2 weeks
2008-07-28 21:33:34 +00:00
#
[;\\;];^;_;<'m>;`;\
# small
(a,<a'>,<a!>,<a/>>,<a?>);\
b;(c,<c,>);(d,<d->);(e,<e'>,<e!>,<e/>>,<e:>);\
f;g;h;(i,<i'>,<i!>,<i/>>,<i:>);\
j;...;m;(n,<n?>);(o,<o'>,<o!>,<o?>,<o/>>,<oe>);\
According to a proposed Norwegian standard for alphabetization of which I've obtained a draft, <u:> is indeed equivalent to u (to my surprise), and <th> sorts immediately after z. The correct ordering is algorithmic (based on the EOR) and can not be accurately represented as a table.
2008-07-30 15:37:13 +00:00
p;q;r;(s,<s<>,<ss>);t;(u,<u'>,<u!>,<u/>>);\
v;w;x;(y,<y'>,<y:>,<u:>);(z,<z<>);\
Add collation sequence for no_NO. The same sequence applies to nb_NO and nn_NO, which are symlinked to no_NO. The patch in the PR contained a number of errors apparently based on (sometimes incorrect) pronunciation; for instance, v and w are distinct letters and should be collated in that order, even if they are pronounced the same, while <u:> should be collated with u, even though it is often mispronounced as y. For lack of a solid reference, I have taken sv_SE and simply changed the last three letters of the alphabet. PR: conf/51920 MFC after: 2 weeks
2008-07-28 21:33:34 +00:00
<th>;\
According to a proposed Norwegian standard for alphabetization of which I've obtained a draft, <u:> is indeed equivalent to u (to my surprise), and <th> sorts immediately after z. The correct ordering is algorithmic (based on the EOR) and can not be accurately represented as a table.
2008-07-30 15:37:13 +00:00
(<ae>,<a:>);(<o//>,<o:>);<aa>;\
Add collation sequence for no_NO. The same sequence applies to nb_NO and nn_NO, which are symlinked to no_NO. The patch in the PR contained a number of errors apparently based on (sometimes incorrect) pronunciation; for instance, v and w are distinct letters and should be collated in that order, even if they are pronounced the same, while <u:> should be collated with u, even though it is often mispronounced as y. For lack of a solid reference, I have taken sv_SE and simply changed the last three letters of the alphabet. PR: conf/51920 MFC after: 2 weeks
2008-07-28 21:33:34 +00:00
#
\{;<NO>;|;\};~;<.M>;<DG>;<My>;<DT>;\
# remains
<-a>;<-o>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink