1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" Copyright (c) 1996-1999 Whistle Communications, Inc.
|
|
|
|
.\" All rights reserved.
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
.\"
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" Subject to the following obligations and disclaimer of warranty, use and
|
|
|
|
.\" redistribution of this software, in source or object code forms, with or
|
|
|
|
.\" without modifications are expressly permitted by Whistle Communications;
|
|
|
|
.\" provided, however, that:
|
|
|
|
.\" 1. Any and all reproductions of the source or object code must include the
|
|
|
|
.\" copyright notice above and the following disclaimer of warranties; and
|
|
|
|
.\" 2. No rights are granted, in any manner or form, to use Whistle
|
|
|
|
.\" Communications, Inc. trademarks, including the mark "WHISTLE
|
|
|
|
.\" COMMUNICATIONS" on advertising, endorsements, or otherwise except as
|
|
|
|
.\" such appears in the above copyright notice or in the software.
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
.\"
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" THIS SOFTWARE IS BEING PROVIDED BY WHISTLE COMMUNICATIONS "AS IS", AND
|
|
|
|
.\" TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, WHISTLE COMMUNICATIONS MAKES NO
|
|
|
|
.\" REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THIS SOFTWARE,
|
|
|
|
.\" INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
|
|
|
|
.\" MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT.
|
|
|
|
.\" WHISTLE COMMUNICATIONS DOES NOT WARRANT, GUARANTEE, OR MAKE ANY
|
|
|
|
.\" REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING THE USE OF, OR THE RESULTS OF THE USE OF THIS
|
|
|
|
.\" SOFTWARE IN TERMS OF ITS CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, RELIABILITY OR OTHERWISE.
|
|
|
|
.\" IN NO EVENT SHALL WHISTLE COMMUNICATIONS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES
|
|
|
|
.\" RESULTING FROM OR ARISING OUT OF ANY USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, INCLUDING
|
|
|
|
.\" WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY,
|
|
|
|
.\" PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
|
|
|
|
.\" SERVICES, LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, HOWEVER CAUSED AND UNDER ANY
|
|
|
|
.\" THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
|
|
|
|
.\" (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF
|
|
|
|
.\" THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF WHISTLE COMMUNICATIONS IS ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY
|
|
|
|
.\" OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
.\"
|
2000-10-26 15:30:44 +00:00
|
|
|
.\" Author: Archie Cobbs <archie@FreeBSD.org>
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.\" $FreeBSD$
|
|
|
|
.\" $Whistle: ng_socket.8,v 1.5 1999/01/25 23:46:27 archie Exp $
|
|
|
|
.\"
|
|
|
|
.Dd January 19, 1999
|
2000-05-04 17:54:37 +00:00
|
|
|
.Dt NG_SOCKET 4
|
2001-07-10 15:31:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Os
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh NAME
|
|
|
|
.Nm ng_socket
|
|
|
|
.Nd netgraph socket node type
|
|
|
|
.Sh SYNOPSIS
|
2005-02-05 11:31:31 +00:00
|
|
|
.In sys/types.h
|
2001-10-01 16:09:29 +00:00
|
|
|
.In netgraph/ng_socket.h
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
.Nm socket
|
2001-08-14 10:01:54 +00:00
|
|
|
node is both a
|
|
|
|
.Bx
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
socket and a netgraph node.
|
|
|
|
The
|
1999-12-21 01:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
.Nm
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
node type allows user-mode processes to participate in the kernel
|
|
|
|
.Xr netgraph 4
|
2001-08-14 10:01:54 +00:00
|
|
|
networking subsystem using the
|
|
|
|
.Bx
|
2003-06-28 23:53:39 +00:00
|
|
|
socket interface.
|
|
|
|
The process must have
|
1999-11-21 23:19:13 +00:00
|
|
|
root privileges to be able to create netgraph sockets however once created,
|
|
|
|
any process that has one may use it.
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
A new
|
1999-12-21 01:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
.Nm
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
node is created by creating a new socket of type
|
|
|
|
.Dv NG_CONTROL
|
|
|
|
in the protocol family
|
|
|
|
.Dv PF_NETGRAPH ,
|
|
|
|
using the
|
|
|
|
.Xr socket 2
|
|
|
|
system call.
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
Any control messages received by the node
|
|
|
|
and not having a cookie value of
|
1999-11-06 21:07:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.Dv NGM_SOCKET_COOKIE
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
are received by the process, using
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr recvfrom 2 ;
|
|
|
|
the socket address argument is a
|
|
|
|
.Dv "struct sockaddr_ng"
|
2003-06-28 23:53:39 +00:00
|
|
|
containing the sender's netgraph address.
|
|
|
|
Conversely, control messages can be sent to any node by calling
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr sendto 2 ,
|
|
|
|
supplying the recipient's address in a
|
|
|
|
.Dv "struct sockaddr_ng" .
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
|
.Xr bind 2
|
|
|
|
system call may be used to assign a global netgraph name to the node.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
To transmit and receive netgraph data packets, a
|
|
|
|
.Dv NG_DATA
|
|
|
|
socket must also be created using
|
|
|
|
.Xr socket 2
|
|
|
|
and associated with a
|
1999-12-21 01:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
.Nm
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
node.
|
2012-05-12 03:25:46 +00:00
|
|
|
.Dv NG_DATA
|
|
|
|
sockets do not automatically
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
have nodes associated with them; they are bound to a specific node via the
|
|
|
|
.Xr connect 2
|
2003-06-28 23:53:39 +00:00
|
|
|
system call.
|
|
|
|
The address argument is the netgraph address of the
|
1999-12-21 01:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
.Nm
|
2003-06-28 23:53:39 +00:00
|
|
|
node already created.
|
|
|
|
Once a data socket is associated with a node,
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
any data packets received by the node are read using
|
|
|
|
.Xr recvfrom 2
|
|
|
|
and any packets to be sent out from the node are written using
|
|
|
|
.Xr sendto 2 .
|
|
|
|
In the case of data sockets, the
|
|
|
|
.Dv "struct sockaddr_ng"
|
|
|
|
contains the name of the
|
|
|
|
.Em hook
|
|
|
|
on which the data was received or should be sent.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
1999-11-21 12:03:00 +00:00
|
|
|
As a special case, to allow netgraph data sockets to be used as stdin or stdout
|
|
|
|
on naive programs, a
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr sendto 2
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
with a NULL sockaddr pointer, a
|
1999-11-21 12:03:00 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr send 2
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
or a
|
1999-11-21 12:03:00 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr write 2
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
will succeed in the case where there is exactly ONE hook attached to
|
1999-11-21 12:03:00 +00:00
|
|
|
the socket node, (and thus the path is unambiguous).
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
There is a user library that simplifies using netgraph sockets; see
|
|
|
|
.Xr netgraph 3 .
|
|
|
|
.Sh HOOKS
|
|
|
|
This node type supports hooks with arbitrary names (as long as
|
|
|
|
they are unique) and always accepts hook connection requests.
|
|
|
|
.Sh CONTROL MESSAGES
|
1999-11-06 21:07:32 +00:00
|
|
|
This node type supports the generic control messages, plus the following:
|
|
|
|
.Bl -tag -width foo
|
|
|
|
.It Dv NGM_SOCK_CMD_NOLINGER
|
|
|
|
When the last hook is removed from this node, it will shut down as
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
if it had received a
|
1999-11-06 21:07:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.Dv NGM_SHUTDOWN
|
2004-07-03 18:29:24 +00:00
|
|
|
message.
|
|
|
|
Attempts to access the sockets associated will return
|
1999-11-06 21:07:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.Er ENOTCONN .
|
|
|
|
.It Dv NGM_SOCK_CMD_LINGER
|
2003-06-28 23:53:39 +00:00
|
|
|
This is the default mode.
|
|
|
|
When the last hook is removed, the node will
|
1999-11-06 21:07:32 +00:00
|
|
|
continue to exist, ready to accept new hooks until it
|
|
|
|
is explicitly shut down.
|
|
|
|
.El
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
All other messages
|
|
|
|
with neither the
|
|
|
|
.Dv NGM_SOCKET_COOKIE
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
.Dv NGM_GENERIC_COOKIE
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
will be passed unaltered up the
|
|
|
|
.Dv NG_CONTROL
|
1999-11-06 21:07:32 +00:00
|
|
|
socket.
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh SHUTDOWN
|
|
|
|
This node type shuts down and disappears when both the associated
|
|
|
|
.Dv NG_CONTROL
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
.Dv NG_DATA
|
|
|
|
sockets have been closed, or a
|
|
|
|
.Dv NGM_SHUTDOWN
|
2003-06-28 23:53:39 +00:00
|
|
|
control message is received.
|
|
|
|
In the latter case, attempts to write
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
to the still-open sockets will return
|
|
|
|
.Er ENOTCONN .
|
2001-07-14 19:41:16 +00:00
|
|
|
If the
|
1999-11-06 21:07:32 +00:00
|
|
|
.Dv NGM_SOCK_CMD_NOLINGER
|
|
|
|
message has been received, closure of the last hook will also initiate
|
|
|
|
a shutdown of the node.
|
1999-10-21 09:06:11 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
.Xr socket 2 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr netgraph 3 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr netgraph 4 ,
|
2000-05-04 17:54:37 +00:00
|
|
|
.Xr ng_ksocket 4 ,
|
|
|
|
.Xr ngctl 8
|
1999-12-21 01:25:21 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh HISTORY
|
|
|
|
The
|
|
|
|
.Nm
|
|
|
|
node type was implemented in
|
|
|
|
.Fx 4.0 .
|
|
|
|
.Sh AUTHORS
|
2014-06-26 21:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
.An Julian Elischer Aq Mt julian@FreeBSD.org
|
2005-01-21 08:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
.Sh BUGS
|
|
|
|
It is not possible to reject the connection of a hook, though any
|
|
|
|
data received on that hook can certainly be ignored.
|
|
|
|
.Pp
|
|
|
|
The controlling process is not notified of all events that an in-kernel node
|
|
|
|
would be notified of, e.g.\& a new hook, or hook removal.
|
|
|
|
Some node-initiated messages should be defined for this purpose (to be
|
|
|
|
sent up the control socket).
|