Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* FQ_PIE - The FlowQueue-PIE scheduler/AQM
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* $FreeBSD$
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2016 Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures,
|
|
|
|
* Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
|
|
|
|
* Portions of this code were made possible in part by a gift from
|
|
|
|
* The Comcast Innovation Fund.
|
|
|
|
* Implemented by Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
* are met:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
|
|
|
|
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
|
|
|
|
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
|
|
|
|
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
|
|
|
|
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
|
|
|
|
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
|
|
|
|
* SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Important note:
|
|
|
|
* As there is no an office document for FQ-PIE specification, we used
|
|
|
|
* FQ-CoDel algorithm with some modifications to implement FQ-PIE.
|
|
|
|
* This FQ-PIE implementation is a beta version and have not been tested
|
|
|
|
* extensively. Our FQ-PIE uses stand-alone PIE AQM per sub-queue. By
|
|
|
|
* default, timestamp is used to calculate queue delay instead of departure
|
|
|
|
* rate estimation method. Although departure rate estimation is available
|
|
|
|
* as testing option, the results could be incorrect. Moreover, turning PIE on
|
|
|
|
* and off option is available but it does not work properly in this version.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef _KERNEL
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/malloc.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/socket.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/mbuf.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/lock.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/mutex.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <net/if.h> /* IFNAMSIZ */
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/in.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/ip_var.h> /* ipfw_rule_ref */
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/ip_fw.h> /* flow_id */
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/ip_dummynet.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/proc.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/rwlock.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <netpfil/ipfw/ip_fw_private.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/ip.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/ip6.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/ip_icmp.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/tcp.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netinet/udp.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/queue.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/hash.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <netpfil/ipfw/dn_heap.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netpfil/ipfw/ip_dn_private.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <netpfil/ipfw/dn_aqm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netpfil/ipfw/dn_aqm_pie.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <netpfil/ipfw/dn_sched.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#include <dn_test.h>
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define DN_SCHED_FQ_PIE 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* list of queues */
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_HEAD(fq_pie_list, fq_pie_flow) ;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* FQ_PIE parameters including PIE */
|
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_fq_pie_parms {
|
|
|
|
struct dn_aqm_pie_parms pcfg; /* PIE configuration Parameters */
|
|
|
|
/* FQ_PIE Parameters */
|
|
|
|
uint32_t flows_cnt; /* number of flows */
|
|
|
|
uint32_t limit; /* hard limit of FQ_PIE queue size*/
|
|
|
|
uint32_t quantum;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* flow (sub-queue) stats */
|
|
|
|
struct flow_stats {
|
|
|
|
uint64_t tot_pkts; /* statistics counters */
|
|
|
|
uint64_t tot_bytes;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t length; /* Queue length, in packets */
|
|
|
|
uint32_t len_bytes; /* Queue length, in bytes */
|
|
|
|
uint32_t drops;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* A flow of packets (sub-queue)*/
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow {
|
|
|
|
struct mq mq; /* list of packets */
|
|
|
|
struct flow_stats stats; /* statistics */
|
|
|
|
int deficit;
|
|
|
|
int active; /* 1: flow is active (in a list) */
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status pst; /* pie status variables */
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si_extra *psi_extra;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
STAILQ_ENTRY(fq_pie_flow) flowchain;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* extra fq_pie scheduler configurations */
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_schk {
|
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_fq_pie_parms cfg;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* fq_pie scheduler instance extra state vars.
|
|
|
|
* The purpose of separation this structure is to preserve number of active
|
|
|
|
* sub-queues and the flows array pointer even after the scheduler instance
|
|
|
|
* is destroyed.
|
|
|
|
* Preserving these varaiables allows freeing the allocated memory by
|
|
|
|
* fqpie_callout_cleanup() independently from fq_pie_free_sched().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si_extra {
|
|
|
|
uint32_t nr_active_q; /* number of active queues */
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow *flows; /* array of flows (queues) */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
/* fq_pie scheduler instance */
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si {
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_inst _si; /* standard scheduler instance. SHOULD BE FIRST */
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
struct dn_queue main_q; /* main queue is after si directly */
|
|
|
|
uint32_t perturbation; /* random value */
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_list newflows; /* list of new queues */
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_list oldflows; /* list of old queues */
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si_extra *si_extra; /* extra state vars*/
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct dn_alg fq_pie_desc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Default FQ-PIE parameters including PIE */
|
|
|
|
/* PIE defaults
|
|
|
|
* target=15ms, max_burst=150ms, max_ecnth=0.1,
|
|
|
|
* alpha=0.125, beta=1.25, tupdate=15ms
|
|
|
|
* FQ-
|
|
|
|
* flows=1024, limit=10240, quantum =1514
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_fq_pie_parms
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_sysctl = {{15000 * AQM_TIME_1US, 15000 * AQM_TIME_1US,
|
|
|
|
150000 * AQM_TIME_1US, PIE_SCALE * 0.1, PIE_SCALE * 0.125,
|
|
|
|
PIE_SCALE * 1.25, PIE_CAPDROP_ENABLED | PIE_DERAND_ENABLED},
|
|
|
|
1024, 10240, 1514};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_alpha_beta_handler(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int error;
|
|
|
|
long value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(oidp->oid_name,"alpha"))
|
|
|
|
value = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.alpha;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
value = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.beta;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value = value * 1000 / PIE_SCALE;
|
|
|
|
error = sysctl_handle_long(oidp, &value, 0, req);
|
|
|
|
if (error != 0 || req->newptr == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return (error);
|
|
|
|
if (value < 1 || value > 7 * PIE_SCALE)
|
|
|
|
return (EINVAL);
|
|
|
|
value = (value * PIE_SCALE) / 1000;
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(oidp->oid_name,"alpha"))
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.alpha = value;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.beta = value;
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_target_tupdate_maxb_handler(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int error;
|
|
|
|
long value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(oidp->oid_name,"target"))
|
|
|
|
value = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.qdelay_ref;
|
|
|
|
else if (!strcmp(oidp->oid_name,"tupdate"))
|
|
|
|
value = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.tupdate;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
value = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.max_burst;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value = value / AQM_TIME_1US;
|
|
|
|
error = sysctl_handle_long(oidp, &value, 0, req);
|
|
|
|
if (error != 0 || req->newptr == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return (error);
|
|
|
|
if (value < 1 || value > 10 * AQM_TIME_1S)
|
|
|
|
return (EINVAL);
|
|
|
|
value = value * AQM_TIME_1US;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(oidp->oid_name,"target"))
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.qdelay_ref = value;
|
|
|
|
else if (!strcmp(oidp->oid_name,"tupdate"))
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.tupdate = value;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.max_burst = value;
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_max_ecnth_handler(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int error;
|
|
|
|
long value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.max_ecnth;
|
|
|
|
value = value * 1000 / PIE_SCALE;
|
|
|
|
error = sysctl_handle_long(oidp, &value, 0, req);
|
|
|
|
if (error != 0 || req->newptr == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return (error);
|
|
|
|
if (value < 1 || value > PIE_SCALE)
|
|
|
|
return (EINVAL);
|
|
|
|
value = (value * PIE_SCALE) / 1000;
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.max_ecnth = value;
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* define FQ- PIE sysctl variables */
|
|
|
|
SYSBEGIN(f4)
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DECL(_net_inet);
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DECL(_net_inet_ip);
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_DECL(_net_inet_ip_dummynet);
|
|
|
|
static SYSCTL_NODE(_net_inet_ip_dummynet, OID_AUTO, fqpie,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_RW, 0, "FQ_PIE");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef SYSCTL_NODE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_PROC(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, target,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_LONG | CTLFLAG_RW, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_target_tupdate_maxb_handler, "L",
|
|
|
|
"queue target in microsecond");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_PROC(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, tupdate,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_LONG | CTLFLAG_RW, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_target_tupdate_maxb_handler, "L",
|
|
|
|
"the frequency of drop probability calculation in microsecond");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_PROC(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, max_burst,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_LONG | CTLFLAG_RW, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_target_tupdate_maxb_handler, "L",
|
|
|
|
"Burst allowance interval in microsecond");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_PROC(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, max_ecnth,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_LONG | CTLFLAG_RW, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_max_ecnth_handler, "L",
|
|
|
|
"ECN safeguard threshold scaled by 1000");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_PROC(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, alpha,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_LONG | CTLFLAG_RW, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_alpha_beta_handler, "L", "PIE alpha scaled by 1000");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_PROC(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, beta,
|
|
|
|
CTLTYPE_LONG | CTLFLAG_RW, NULL, 0,
|
|
|
|
fqpie_sysctl_alpha_beta_handler, "L", "beta scaled by 1000");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_UINT(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, quantum,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_RW, &fq_pie_sysctl.quantum, 1514, "quantum for FQ_PIE");
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_UINT(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, flows,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_RW, &fq_pie_sysctl.flows_cnt, 1024, "Number of queues for FQ_PIE");
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_UINT(_net_inet_ip_dummynet_fqpie, OID_AUTO, limit,
|
|
|
|
CTLFLAG_RW, &fq_pie_sysctl.limit, 10240, "limit for FQ_PIE");
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Helper function to update queue&main-queue and scheduler statistics.
|
|
|
|
* negative len & drop -> drop
|
|
|
|
* negative len -> dequeue
|
|
|
|
* positive len -> enqueue
|
|
|
|
* positive len + drop -> drop during enqueue
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
__inline static void
|
|
|
|
fq_update_stats(struct fq_pie_flow *q, struct fq_pie_si *si, int len,
|
|
|
|
int drop)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int inc = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (len < 0)
|
|
|
|
inc = -1;
|
|
|
|
else if (len > 0)
|
|
|
|
inc = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (drop) {
|
|
|
|
si->main_q.ni.drops ++;
|
|
|
|
q->stats.drops ++;
|
|
|
|
si->_si.ni.drops ++;
|
|
|
|
io_pkt_drop ++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!drop || (drop && len < 0)) {
|
|
|
|
/* Update stats for the main queue */
|
|
|
|
si->main_q.ni.length += inc;
|
|
|
|
si->main_q.ni.len_bytes += len;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*update sub-queue stats */
|
|
|
|
q->stats.length += inc;
|
|
|
|
q->stats.len_bytes += len;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*update scheduler instance stats */
|
|
|
|
si->_si.ni.length += inc;
|
|
|
|
si->_si.ni.len_bytes += len;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (inc > 0) {
|
|
|
|
si->main_q.ni.tot_bytes += len;
|
|
|
|
si->main_q.ni.tot_pkts ++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
q->stats.tot_bytes +=len;
|
|
|
|
q->stats.tot_pkts++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
si->_si.ni.tot_bytes +=len;
|
|
|
|
si->_si.ni.tot_pkts ++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Extract a packet from the head of sub-queue 'q'
|
|
|
|
* Return a packet or NULL if the queue is empty.
|
|
|
|
* If getts is set, also extract packet's timestamp from mtag.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
__inline static struct mbuf *
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_extract_head(struct fq_pie_flow *q, aqm_time_t *pkt_ts,
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si *si, int getts)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct mbuf *m = q->mq.head;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (m == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return m;
|
|
|
|
q->mq.head = m->m_nextpkt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fq_update_stats(q, si, -m->m_pkthdr.len, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (si->main_q.ni.length == 0) /* queue is now idle */
|
|
|
|
si->main_q.q_time = dn_cfg.curr_time;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (getts) {
|
|
|
|
/* extract packet timestamp*/
|
|
|
|
struct m_tag *mtag;
|
|
|
|
mtag = m_tag_locate(m, MTAG_ABI_COMPAT, DN_AQM_MTAG_TS, NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (mtag == NULL){
|
|
|
|
D("PIE timestamp mtag not found!");
|
|
|
|
*pkt_ts = 0;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
*pkt_ts = *(aqm_time_t *)(mtag + 1);
|
|
|
|
m_tag_delete(m,mtag);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return m;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Callout function for drop probability calculation
|
|
|
|
* This function is called over tupdate ms and takes pointer of FQ-PIE
|
|
|
|
* flow as an argument
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
fq_calculate_drop_prob(void *x)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow *q = (struct fq_pie_flow *) x;
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status *pst = &q->pst;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_aqm_pie_parms *pprms;
|
|
|
|
int64_t p, prob, oldprob;
|
|
|
|
aqm_time_t now;
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
int p_isneg;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
now = AQM_UNOW;
|
|
|
|
pprms = pst->parms;
|
|
|
|
prob = pst->drop_prob;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-19 08:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
/* calculate current qdelay using DRE method.
|
|
|
|
* If TS is used and no data in the queue, reset current_qdelay
|
|
|
|
* as it stays at last value during dequeue process.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (pprms->flags & PIE_DEPRATEEST_ENABLED)
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
pst->current_qdelay = ((uint64_t)q->stats.len_bytes * pst->avg_dq_time)
|
|
|
|
>> PIE_DQ_THRESHOLD_BITS;
|
2017-05-19 08:38:03 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
if (!q->stats.len_bytes)
|
|
|
|
pst->current_qdelay = 0;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* calculate drop probability */
|
|
|
|
p = (int64_t)pprms->alpha *
|
|
|
|
((int64_t)pst->current_qdelay - (int64_t)pprms->qdelay_ref);
|
|
|
|
p +=(int64_t) pprms->beta *
|
|
|
|
((int64_t)pst->current_qdelay - (int64_t)pst->qdelay_old);
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* take absolute value so right shift result is well defined */
|
|
|
|
p_isneg = p < 0;
|
|
|
|
if (p_isneg) {
|
|
|
|
p = -p;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We PIE_MAX_PROB shift by 12-bits to increase the division precision */
|
|
|
|
p *= (PIE_MAX_PROB << 12) / AQM_TIME_1S;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* auto-tune drop probability */
|
2016-06-01 20:04:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (prob < (PIE_MAX_PROB / 1000000)) /* 0.000001 */
|
|
|
|
p >>= 11 + PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS + 12;
|
|
|
|
else if (prob < (PIE_MAX_PROB / 100000)) /* 0.00001 */
|
|
|
|
p >>= 9 + PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS + 12;
|
|
|
|
else if (prob < (PIE_MAX_PROB / 10000)) /* 0.0001 */
|
|
|
|
p >>= 7 + PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS + 12;
|
|
|
|
else if (prob < (PIE_MAX_PROB / 1000)) /* 0.001 */
|
|
|
|
p >>= 5 + PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS + 12;
|
|
|
|
else if (prob < (PIE_MAX_PROB / 100)) /* 0.01 */
|
|
|
|
p >>= 3 + PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS + 12;
|
|
|
|
else if (prob < (PIE_MAX_PROB / 10)) /* 0.1 */
|
|
|
|
p >>= 1 + PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS + 12;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
2016-06-01 20:04:24 +00:00
|
|
|
p >>= PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS + 12;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oldprob = prob;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
if (p_isneg) {
|
|
|
|
prob = prob - p;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
/* check for multiplication underflow */
|
|
|
|
if (prob > oldprob) {
|
|
|
|
prob= 0;
|
|
|
|
D("underflow");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/* Cap Drop adjustment */
|
|
|
|
if ((pprms->flags & PIE_CAPDROP_ENABLED) &&
|
|
|
|
prob >= PIE_MAX_PROB / 10 &&
|
|
|
|
p > PIE_MAX_PROB / 50 ) {
|
|
|
|
p = PIE_MAX_PROB / 50;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
prob = prob + p;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
/* check for multiplication overflow */
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
if (prob<oldprob) {
|
|
|
|
D("overflow");
|
|
|
|
prob= PIE_MAX_PROB;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* decay the drop probability exponentially
|
|
|
|
* and restrict it to range 0 to PIE_MAX_PROB
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (prob < 0) {
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
prob = 0;
|
2017-05-19 01:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
if (pst->current_qdelay == 0 && pst->qdelay_old == 0) {
|
|
|
|
/* 0.98 ~= 1- 1/64 */
|
|
|
|
prob = prob - (prob >> 6);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (prob > PIE_MAX_PROB) {
|
|
|
|
prob = PIE_MAX_PROB;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pst->drop_prob = prob;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* store current delay value */
|
|
|
|
pst->qdelay_old = pst->current_qdelay;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* update burst allowance */
|
|
|
|
if ((pst->sflags & PIE_ACTIVE) && pst->burst_allowance) {
|
|
|
|
if (pst->burst_allowance > pprms->tupdate)
|
|
|
|
pst->burst_allowance -= pprms->tupdate;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
pst->burst_allowance = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pst->sflags & PIE_ACTIVE)
|
|
|
|
callout_reset_sbt(&pst->aqm_pie_callout,
|
|
|
|
(uint64_t)pprms->tupdate * SBT_1US,
|
|
|
|
0, fq_calculate_drop_prob, q, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mtx_unlock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Reset PIE variables & activate the queue
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
__inline static void
|
|
|
|
fq_activate_pie(struct fq_pie_flow *q)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status *pst = &q->pst;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_aqm_pie_parms *pprms;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mtx_lock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
|
|
|
pprms = pst->parms;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pprms = pst->parms;
|
|
|
|
pst->drop_prob = 0;
|
|
|
|
pst->qdelay_old = 0;
|
|
|
|
pst->burst_allowance = pprms->max_burst;
|
|
|
|
pst->accu_prob = 0;
|
|
|
|
pst->dq_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
pst->avg_dq_time = 0;
|
|
|
|
pst->sflags = PIE_INMEASUREMENT | PIE_ACTIVE;
|
|
|
|
pst->measurement_start = AQM_UNOW;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
callout_reset_sbt(&pst->aqm_pie_callout,
|
|
|
|
(uint64_t)pprms->tupdate * SBT_1US,
|
|
|
|
0, fq_calculate_drop_prob, q, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mtx_unlock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Deactivate PIE and stop probe update callout
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
__inline static void
|
|
|
|
fq_deactivate_pie(struct pie_status *pst)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
mtx_lock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
|
|
|
pst->sflags &= ~(PIE_ACTIVE | PIE_INMEASUREMENT);
|
|
|
|
callout_stop(&pst->aqm_pie_callout);
|
|
|
|
//D("PIE Deactivated");
|
|
|
|
mtx_unlock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Initialize PIE for sub-queue 'q'
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
pie_init(struct fq_pie_flow *q, struct fq_pie_schk *fqpie_schk)
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status *pst=&q->pst;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_aqm_pie_parms *pprms = pst->parms;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
int err = 0;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!pprms){
|
|
|
|
D("AQM_PIE is not configured");
|
|
|
|
err = EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
q->psi_extra->nr_active_q++;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* For speed optimization, we caculate 1/3 queue size once here */
|
|
|
|
// XXX limit divided by number of queues divided by 3 ???
|
|
|
|
pst->one_third_q_size = (fqpie_schk->cfg.limit /
|
|
|
|
fqpie_schk->cfg.flows_cnt) / 3;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mtx_init(&pst->lock_mtx, "mtx_pie", NULL, MTX_DEF);
|
|
|
|
callout_init_mtx(&pst->aqm_pie_callout, &pst->lock_mtx,
|
|
|
|
CALLOUT_RETURNUNLOCKED);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* callout function to destroy PIE lock, and free fq_pie flows and fq_pie si
|
|
|
|
* extra memory when number of active sub-queues reaches zero.
|
|
|
|
* 'x' is a fq_pie_flow to be destroyed
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
fqpie_callout_cleanup(void *x)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow *q = x;
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status *pst = &q->pst;
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si_extra *psi_extra;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mtx_unlock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
|
|
|
mtx_destroy(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
|
|
|
psi_extra = q->psi_extra;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DN_BH_WLOCK();
|
|
|
|
psi_extra->nr_active_q--;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* when all sub-queues are destroyed, free flows fq_pie extra vars memory */
|
|
|
|
if (!psi_extra->nr_active_q) {
|
|
|
|
free(psi_extra->flows, M_DUMMYNET);
|
|
|
|
free(psi_extra, M_DUMMYNET);
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_desc.ref_count--;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DN_BH_WUNLOCK();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Clean up PIE status for sub-queue 'q'
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
* Stop callout timer and destroy mtx using fqpie_callout_cleanup() callout.
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
pie_cleanup(struct fq_pie_flow *q)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status *pst = &q->pst;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mtx_lock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
callout_reset_sbt(&pst->aqm_pie_callout,
|
|
|
|
SBT_1US, 0, fqpie_callout_cleanup, q, 0);
|
|
|
|
mtx_unlock(&pst->lock_mtx);
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Dequeue and return a pcaket from sub-queue 'q' or NULL if 'q' is empty.
|
|
|
|
* Also, caculate depature time or queue delay using timestamp
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static struct mbuf *
|
|
|
|
pie_dequeue(struct fq_pie_flow *q, struct fq_pie_si *si)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct mbuf *m;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_aqm_pie_parms *pprms;
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status *pst;
|
|
|
|
aqm_time_t now;
|
|
|
|
aqm_time_t pkt_ts, dq_time;
|
|
|
|
int32_t w;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pst = &q->pst;
|
|
|
|
pprms = q->pst.parms;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*we extarct packet ts only when Departure Rate Estimation dis not used*/
|
|
|
|
m = fq_pie_extract_head(q, &pkt_ts, si,
|
|
|
|
!(pprms->flags & PIE_DEPRATEEST_ENABLED));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!m || !(pst->sflags & PIE_ACTIVE))
|
|
|
|
return m;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
now = AQM_UNOW;
|
|
|
|
if (pprms->flags & PIE_DEPRATEEST_ENABLED) {
|
|
|
|
/* calculate average depature time */
|
|
|
|
if(pst->sflags & PIE_INMEASUREMENT) {
|
|
|
|
pst->dq_count += m->m_pkthdr.len;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (pst->dq_count >= PIE_DQ_THRESHOLD) {
|
|
|
|
dq_time = now - pst->measurement_start;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* if we don't have old avg dq_time i.e PIE is (re)initialized,
|
|
|
|
* don't use weight to calculate new avg_dq_time
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if(pst->avg_dq_time == 0)
|
|
|
|
pst->avg_dq_time = dq_time;
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* weight = PIE_DQ_THRESHOLD/2^6, but we scaled
|
|
|
|
* weight by 2^8. Thus, scaled
|
|
|
|
* weight = PIE_DQ_THRESHOLD /2^8
|
|
|
|
* */
|
|
|
|
w = PIE_DQ_THRESHOLD >> 8;
|
|
|
|
pst->avg_dq_time = (dq_time* w
|
|
|
|
+ (pst->avg_dq_time * ((1L << 8) - w))) >> 8;
|
|
|
|
pst->sflags &= ~PIE_INMEASUREMENT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Start new measurment cycle when the queue has
|
|
|
|
* PIE_DQ_THRESHOLD worth of bytes.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if(!(pst->sflags & PIE_INMEASUREMENT) &&
|
|
|
|
q->stats.len_bytes >= PIE_DQ_THRESHOLD) {
|
|
|
|
pst->sflags |= PIE_INMEASUREMENT;
|
|
|
|
pst->measurement_start = now;
|
|
|
|
pst->dq_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Optionally, use packet timestamp to estimate queue delay */
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
pst->current_qdelay = now - pkt_ts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return m;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Enqueue a packet in q, subject to space and FQ-PIE queue management policy
|
|
|
|
* (whose parameters are in q->fs).
|
|
|
|
* Update stats for the queue and the scheduler.
|
|
|
|
* Return 0 on success, 1 on drop. The packet is consumed anyways.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
pie_enqueue(struct fq_pie_flow *q, struct mbuf* m, struct fq_pie_si *si)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
uint64_t len;
|
|
|
|
struct pie_status *pst;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_aqm_pie_parms *pprms;
|
|
|
|
int t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
len = m->m_pkthdr.len;
|
|
|
|
pst = &q->pst;
|
|
|
|
pprms = pst->parms;
|
|
|
|
t = ENQUE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* drop/mark the packet when PIE is active and burst time elapsed */
|
|
|
|
if (pst->sflags & PIE_ACTIVE && pst->burst_allowance == 0
|
|
|
|
&& drop_early(pst, q->stats.len_bytes) == DROP) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* if drop_prob over ECN threshold, drop the packet
|
|
|
|
* otherwise mark and enqueue it.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (pprms->flags & PIE_ECN_ENABLED && pst->drop_prob <
|
|
|
|
(pprms->max_ecnth << (PIE_PROB_BITS - PIE_FIX_POINT_BITS))
|
|
|
|
&& ecn_mark(m))
|
|
|
|
t = ENQUE;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
t = DROP;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Turn PIE on when 1/3 of the queue is full */
|
|
|
|
if (!(pst->sflags & PIE_ACTIVE) && q->stats.len_bytes >=
|
|
|
|
pst->one_third_q_size) {
|
|
|
|
fq_activate_pie(q);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* reset burst tolerance and optinally turn PIE off*/
|
|
|
|
if (pst->drop_prob == 0 && pst->current_qdelay < (pprms->qdelay_ref >> 1)
|
|
|
|
&& pst->qdelay_old < (pprms->qdelay_ref >> 1)) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pst->burst_allowance = pprms->max_burst;
|
|
|
|
if (pprms->flags & PIE_ON_OFF_MODE_ENABLED && q->stats.len_bytes<=0)
|
|
|
|
fq_deactivate_pie(pst);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Use timestamp if Departure Rate Estimation mode is disabled */
|
|
|
|
if (t != DROP && !(pprms->flags & PIE_DEPRATEEST_ENABLED)) {
|
|
|
|
/* Add TS to mbuf as a TAG */
|
|
|
|
struct m_tag *mtag;
|
|
|
|
mtag = m_tag_locate(m, MTAG_ABI_COMPAT, DN_AQM_MTAG_TS, NULL);
|
|
|
|
if (mtag == NULL)
|
|
|
|
mtag = m_tag_alloc(MTAG_ABI_COMPAT, DN_AQM_MTAG_TS,
|
|
|
|
sizeof(aqm_time_t), M_NOWAIT);
|
|
|
|
if (mtag == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
m_freem(m);
|
|
|
|
t = DROP;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
*(aqm_time_t *)(mtag + 1) = AQM_UNOW;
|
|
|
|
m_tag_prepend(m, mtag);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (t != DROP) {
|
|
|
|
mq_append(&q->mq, m);
|
|
|
|
fq_update_stats(q, si, len, 0);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
fq_update_stats(q, si, len, 1);
|
|
|
|
pst->accu_prob = 0;
|
|
|
|
FREE_PKT(m);
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Drop a packet form the head of FQ-PIE sub-queue */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
pie_drop_head(struct fq_pie_flow *q, struct fq_pie_si *si)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct mbuf *m = q->mq.head;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (m == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
q->mq.head = m->m_nextpkt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fq_update_stats(q, si, -m->m_pkthdr.len, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (si->main_q.ni.length == 0) /* queue is now idle */
|
|
|
|
si->main_q.q_time = dn_cfg.curr_time;
|
|
|
|
/* reset accu_prob after packet drop */
|
|
|
|
q->pst.accu_prob = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FREE_PKT(m);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Classify a packet to queue number using Jenkins hash function.
|
|
|
|
* Return: queue number
|
|
|
|
* the input of the hash are protocol no, perturbation, src IP, dst IP,
|
|
|
|
* src port, dst port,
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static inline int
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_classify_flow(struct mbuf *m, uint16_t fcount, struct fq_pie_si *si)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct ip *ip;
|
|
|
|
struct tcphdr *th;
|
|
|
|
struct udphdr *uh;
|
|
|
|
uint8_t tuple[41];
|
|
|
|
uint16_t hash=0;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-26 10:11:35 +00:00
|
|
|
ip = (struct ip *)mtodo(m, dn_tag_get(m)->iphdr_off);
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
//#ifdef INET6
|
|
|
|
struct ip6_hdr *ip6;
|
|
|
|
int isip6;
|
2017-10-26 10:11:35 +00:00
|
|
|
isip6 = (ip->ip_v == 6);
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if(isip6) {
|
2017-10-26 10:11:35 +00:00
|
|
|
ip6 = (struct ip6_hdr *)ip;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
*((uint8_t *) &tuple[0]) = ip6->ip6_nxt;
|
|
|
|
*((uint32_t *) &tuple[1]) = si->perturbation;
|
|
|
|
memcpy(&tuple[5], ip6->ip6_src.s6_addr, 16);
|
|
|
|
memcpy(&tuple[21], ip6->ip6_dst.s6_addr, 16);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (ip6->ip6_nxt) {
|
|
|
|
case IPPROTO_TCP:
|
|
|
|
th = (struct tcphdr *)(ip6 + 1);
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[37]) = th->th_dport;
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[39]) = th->th_sport;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case IPPROTO_UDP:
|
|
|
|
uh = (struct udphdr *)(ip6 + 1);
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[37]) = uh->uh_dport;
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[39]) = uh->uh_sport;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
memset(&tuple[37], 0, 4);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hash = jenkins_hash(tuple, 41, HASHINIT) % fcount;
|
|
|
|
return hash;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
//#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* IPv4 */
|
|
|
|
*((uint8_t *) &tuple[0]) = ip->ip_p;
|
|
|
|
*((uint32_t *) &tuple[1]) = si->perturbation;
|
|
|
|
*((uint32_t *) &tuple[5]) = ip->ip_src.s_addr;
|
|
|
|
*((uint32_t *) &tuple[9]) = ip->ip_dst.s_addr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (ip->ip_p) {
|
|
|
|
case IPPROTO_TCP:
|
|
|
|
th = (struct tcphdr *)(ip + 1);
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[13]) = th->th_dport;
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[15]) = th->th_sport;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case IPPROTO_UDP:
|
|
|
|
uh = (struct udphdr *)(ip + 1);
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[13]) = uh->uh_dport;
|
|
|
|
*((uint16_t *) &tuple[15]) = uh->uh_sport;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
memset(&tuple[13], 0, 4);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
hash = jenkins_hash(tuple, 17, HASHINIT) % fcount;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return hash;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Enqueue a packet into an appropriate queue according to
|
|
|
|
* FQ-CoDe; algorithm.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_enqueue(struct dn_sch_inst *_si, struct dn_queue *_q,
|
|
|
|
struct mbuf *m)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si *si;
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_schk *schk;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_fq_pie_parms *param;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_queue *mainq;
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow *flows;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
int idx, drop, i, maxidx;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mainq = (struct dn_queue *)(_si + 1);
|
|
|
|
si = (struct fq_pie_si *)_si;
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
flows = si->si_extra->flows;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
schk = (struct fq_pie_schk *)(si->_si.sched+1);
|
|
|
|
param = &schk->cfg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* classify a packet to queue number*/
|
|
|
|
idx = fq_pie_classify_flow(m, param->flows_cnt, si);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* enqueue packet into appropriate queue using PIE AQM.
|
|
|
|
* Note: 'pie_enqueue' function returns 1 only when it unable to
|
|
|
|
* add timestamp to packet (no limit check)*/
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
drop = pie_enqueue(&flows[idx], m, si);
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* pie unable to timestamp a packet */
|
|
|
|
if (drop)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If the flow (sub-queue) is not active ,then add it to tail of
|
|
|
|
* new flows list, initialize and activate it.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!flows[idx].active) {
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&si->newflows, &flows[idx], flowchain);
|
|
|
|
flows[idx].deficit = param->quantum;
|
|
|
|
fq_activate_pie(&flows[idx]);
|
|
|
|
flows[idx].active = 1;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* check the limit for all queues and remove a packet from the
|
|
|
|
* largest one
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (mainq->ni.length > schk->cfg.limit) {
|
|
|
|
/* find first active flow */
|
|
|
|
for (maxidx = 0; maxidx < schk->cfg.flows_cnt; maxidx++)
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (flows[maxidx].active)
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (maxidx < schk->cfg.flows_cnt) {
|
|
|
|
/* find the largest sub- queue */
|
|
|
|
for (i = maxidx + 1; i < schk->cfg.flows_cnt; i++)
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (flows[i].active && flows[i].stats.length >
|
|
|
|
flows[maxidx].stats.length)
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
maxidx = i;
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
pie_drop_head(&flows[maxidx], si);
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
drop = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return drop;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Dequeue a packet from an appropriate queue according to
|
|
|
|
* FQ-CoDel algorithm.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static struct mbuf *
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_dequeue(struct dn_sch_inst *_si)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si *si;
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_schk *schk;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_fq_pie_parms *param;
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow *f;
|
|
|
|
struct mbuf *mbuf;
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_list *fq_pie_flowlist;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
si = (struct fq_pie_si *)_si;
|
|
|
|
schk = (struct fq_pie_schk *)(si->_si.sched+1);
|
|
|
|
param = &schk->cfg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
/* select a list to start with */
|
|
|
|
if (STAILQ_EMPTY(&si->newflows))
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_flowlist = &si->oldflows;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_flowlist = &si->newflows;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Both new and old queue lists are empty, return NULL */
|
|
|
|
if (STAILQ_EMPTY(fq_pie_flowlist))
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f = STAILQ_FIRST(fq_pie_flowlist);
|
|
|
|
while (f != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
/* if there is no flow(sub-queue) deficit, increase deficit
|
|
|
|
* by quantum, move the flow to the tail of old flows list
|
|
|
|
* and try another flow.
|
|
|
|
* Otherwise, the flow will be used for dequeue.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (f->deficit < 0) {
|
|
|
|
f->deficit += param->quantum;
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_REMOVE_HEAD(fq_pie_flowlist, flowchain);
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&si->oldflows, f, flowchain);
|
|
|
|
} else
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f = STAILQ_FIRST(fq_pie_flowlist);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* the new flows list is empty, try old flows list */
|
|
|
|
if (STAILQ_EMPTY(fq_pie_flowlist))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Dequeue a packet from the selected flow */
|
|
|
|
mbuf = pie_dequeue(f, si);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* pie did not return a packet */
|
|
|
|
if (!mbuf) {
|
|
|
|
/* If the selected flow belongs to new flows list, then move
|
|
|
|
* it to the tail of old flows list. Otherwise, deactivate it and
|
|
|
|
* remove it from the old list and
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (fq_pie_flowlist == &si->newflows) {
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_REMOVE_HEAD(fq_pie_flowlist, flowchain);
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&si->oldflows, f, flowchain);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
f->active = 0;
|
|
|
|
fq_deactivate_pie(&f->pst);
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_REMOVE_HEAD(fq_pie_flowlist, flowchain);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* start again */
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* we have a packet to return,
|
|
|
|
* update flow deficit and return the packet*/
|
|
|
|
f->deficit -= mbuf->m_pkthdr.len;
|
|
|
|
return mbuf;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} while (1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* unreachable point */
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Initialize fq_pie scheduler instance.
|
|
|
|
* also, allocate memory for flows array.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_new_sched(struct dn_sch_inst *_si)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si *si;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_queue *q;
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_schk *schk;
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow *flows;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
si = (struct fq_pie_si *)_si;
|
|
|
|
schk = (struct fq_pie_schk *)(_si->sched+1);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if(si->si_extra) {
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
D("si already configured!");
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* init the main queue */
|
|
|
|
q = &si->main_q;
|
|
|
|
set_oid(&q->ni.oid, DN_QUEUE, sizeof(*q));
|
|
|
|
q->_si = _si;
|
|
|
|
q->fs = _si->sched->fs;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
/* allocate memory for scheduler instance extra vars */
|
|
|
|
si->si_extra = malloc(sizeof(struct fq_pie_si_extra),
|
|
|
|
M_DUMMYNET, M_NOWAIT | M_ZERO);
|
|
|
|
if (si->si_extra == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
D("cannot allocate memory for fq_pie si extra vars");
|
|
|
|
return ENOMEM ;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
/* allocate memory for flows array */
|
2018-01-11 15:29:29 +00:00
|
|
|
si->si_extra->flows = mallocarray(schk->cfg.flows_cnt,
|
|
|
|
sizeof(struct fq_pie_flow), M_DUMMYNET, M_NOWAIT | M_ZERO);
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
flows = si->si_extra->flows;
|
|
|
|
if (flows == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
free(si->si_extra, M_DUMMYNET);
|
|
|
|
si->si_extra = NULL;
|
|
|
|
D("cannot allocate memory for fq_pie flows");
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
return ENOMEM ;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* init perturbation for this si */
|
|
|
|
si->perturbation = random();
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
si->si_extra->nr_active_q = 0;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* init the old and new flows lists */
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_INIT(&si->newflows);
|
|
|
|
STAILQ_INIT(&si->oldflows);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* init the flows (sub-queues) */
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < schk->cfg.flows_cnt; i++) {
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
flows[i].pst.parms = &schk->cfg.pcfg;
|
|
|
|
flows[i].psi_extra = si->si_extra;
|
|
|
|
pie_init(&flows[i], schk);
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_desc.ref_count++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Free fq_pie scheduler instance.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_free_sched(struct dn_sch_inst *_si)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_si *si;
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_schk *schk;
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_flow *flows;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
si = (struct fq_pie_si *)_si;
|
|
|
|
schk = (struct fq_pie_schk *)(_si->sched+1);
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
flows = si->si_extra->flows;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < schk->cfg.flows_cnt; i++) {
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
pie_cleanup(&flows[i]);
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-07-12 17:32:40 +00:00
|
|
|
si->si_extra = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
Import Dummynet AQM version 0.2.1 (CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE).
Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures
Implementing AQM in FreeBSD
* Overview <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/index.html>
* Articles, Papers and Presentations
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/papers.html>
* Patches and Tools <http://caia.swin.edu.au/freebsd/aqm/downloads.html>
Overview
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in better managing
the depth of bottleneck queues in routers, switches and other places
that get congested. Solutions include transport protocol enhancements
at the end-hosts (such as delay-based or hybrid congestion control
schemes) and active queue management (AQM) schemes applied within
bottleneck queues.
The notion of AQM has been around since at least the late 1990s
(e.g. RFC 2309). In recent years the proliferation of oversized
buffers in all sorts of network devices (aka bufferbloat) has
stimulated keen community interest in four new AQM schemes -- CoDel,
FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE.
The IETF AQM working group is looking to document these schemes,
and independent implementations are a corner-stone of the IETF's
process for confirming the clarity of publicly available protocol
descriptions. While significant development work on all three schemes
has occured in the Linux kernel, there is very little in FreeBSD.
Project Goals
This project began in late 2015, and aims to design and implement
functionally-correct versions of CoDel, FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ_PIE
in FreeBSD (with code BSD-licensed as much as practical). We have
chosen to do this as extensions to FreeBSD's ipfw/dummynet firewall
and traffic shaper. Implementation of these AQM schemes in FreeBSD
will:
* Demonstrate whether the publicly available documentation is
sufficient to enable independent, functionally equivalent implementations
* Provide a broader suite of AQM options for sections the networking
community that rely on FreeBSD platforms
Program Members:
* Rasool Al Saadi (developer)
* Grenville Armitage (project lead)
Acknowledgements:
This project has been made possible in part by a gift from the
Comcast Innovation Fund.
Submitted by: Rasool Al-Saadi <ralsaadi@swin.edu.au>
X-No objection: core
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6388
2016-05-26 21:40:13 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Configure FQ-PIE scheduler.
|
|
|
|
* the configurations for the scheduler is passed fromipfw userland.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_config(struct dn_schk *_schk)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_schk *schk;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_extra_parms *ep;
|
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_fq_pie_parms *fqp_cfg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
schk = (struct fq_pie_schk *)(_schk+1);
|
|
|
|
ep = (struct dn_extra_parms *) _schk->cfg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* par array contains fq_pie configuration as follow
|
|
|
|
* PIE: 0- qdelay_ref,1- tupdate, 2- max_burst
|
|
|
|
* 3- max_ecnth, 4- alpha, 5- beta, 6- flags
|
|
|
|
* FQ_PIE: 7- quantum, 8- limit, 9- flows
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (ep && ep->oid.len ==sizeof(*ep) &&
|
|
|
|
ep->oid.subtype == DN_SCH_PARAMS) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg = &schk->cfg;
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[0] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.qdelay_ref = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.qdelay_ref;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.qdelay_ref = ep->par[0];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[1] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.tupdate = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.tupdate;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.tupdate = ep->par[1];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[2] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_burst = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.max_burst;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_burst = ep->par[2];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[3] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_ecnth = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.max_ecnth;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_ecnth = ep->par[3];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[4] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.alpha = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.alpha;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.alpha = ep->par[4];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[5] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.beta = fq_pie_sysctl.pcfg.beta;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.beta = ep->par[5];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[6] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.flags = 0;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.flags = ep->par[6];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* FQ configurations */
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[7] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->quantum = fq_pie_sysctl.quantum;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->quantum = ep->par[7];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[8] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->limit = fq_pie_sysctl.limit;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->limit = ep->par[8];
|
|
|
|
if (ep->par[9] < 0)
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->flows_cnt = fq_pie_sysctl.flows_cnt;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->flows_cnt = ep->par[9];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Bound the configurations */
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.qdelay_ref = BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->pcfg.qdelay_ref,
|
|
|
|
1, 5 * AQM_TIME_1S);
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.tupdate = BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->pcfg.tupdate,
|
|
|
|
1, 5 * AQM_TIME_1S);
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_burst = BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_burst,
|
|
|
|
0, 5 * AQM_TIME_1S);
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_ecnth = BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_ecnth,
|
|
|
|
0, PIE_SCALE);
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.alpha = BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->pcfg.alpha, 0, 7 * PIE_SCALE);
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->pcfg.beta = BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->pcfg.beta, 0, 7 * PIE_SCALE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->quantum = BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->quantum,1,9000);
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->limit= BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->limit,1,20480);
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg->flows_cnt= BOUND_VAR(fqp_cfg->flows_cnt,1,65536);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else {
|
|
|
|
D("Wrong parameters for fq_pie scheduler");
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Return FQ-PIE scheduler configurations
|
|
|
|
* the configurations for the scheduler is passed to userland.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
fq_pie_getconfig (struct dn_schk *_schk, struct dn_extra_parms *ep) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct fq_pie_schk *schk = (struct fq_pie_schk *)(_schk+1);
|
|
|
|
struct dn_sch_fq_pie_parms *fqp_cfg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fqp_cfg = &schk->cfg;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strcpy(ep->name, fq_pie_desc.name);
|
|
|
|
ep->par[0] = fqp_cfg->pcfg.qdelay_ref;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[1] = fqp_cfg->pcfg.tupdate;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[2] = fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_burst;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[3] = fqp_cfg->pcfg.max_ecnth;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[4] = fqp_cfg->pcfg.alpha;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[5] = fqp_cfg->pcfg.beta;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[6] = fqp_cfg->pcfg.flags;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ep->par[7] = fqp_cfg->quantum;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[8] = fqp_cfg->limit;
|
|
|
|
ep->par[9] = fqp_cfg->flows_cnt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* FQ-PIE scheduler descriptor
|
|
|
|
* contains the type of the scheduler, the name, the size of extra
|
|
|
|
* data structures, and function pointers.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static struct dn_alg fq_pie_desc = {
|
|
|
|
_SI( .type = ) DN_SCHED_FQ_PIE,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .name = ) "FQ_PIE",
|
|
|
|
_SI( .flags = ) 0,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_SI( .schk_datalen = ) sizeof(struct fq_pie_schk),
|
|
|
|
_SI( .si_datalen = ) sizeof(struct fq_pie_si) - sizeof(struct dn_sch_inst),
|
|
|
|
_SI( .q_datalen = ) 0,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_SI( .enqueue = ) fq_pie_enqueue,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .dequeue = ) fq_pie_dequeue,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .config = ) fq_pie_config, /* new sched i.e. sched X config ...*/
|
|
|
|
_SI( .destroy = ) NULL, /*sched x delete */
|
|
|
|
_SI( .new_sched = ) fq_pie_new_sched, /* new schd instance */
|
|
|
|
_SI( .free_sched = ) fq_pie_free_sched, /* delete schd instance */
|
|
|
|
_SI( .new_fsk = ) NULL,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .free_fsk = ) NULL,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .new_queue = ) NULL,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .free_queue = ) NULL,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .getconfig = ) fq_pie_getconfig,
|
|
|
|
_SI( .ref_count = ) 0
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECLARE_DNSCHED_MODULE(dn_fq_pie, &fq_pie_desc);
|