Fixup r218424: uio_yield() was scaling directly to userland priority.
When kern_yield() was introduced with the possibility to specify a new priority, the behaviour changed by not lowering priority at all in the consumers, making the yielding mechanism highly ineffective for high priority kthreads like bufdaemon, syncer, vlrudaemon, etc. There are no evidences that consumers could bear with such change in semantic and this situation could finally lead to bugs similar to the ones fixed in r244240. Re-specify userland pri for kthreads involved. Tested by: pho Reviewed by: kib, mdf MFC after: 1 week
This commit is contained in:
parent
1292747048
commit
0d14b65c78
@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ buf_daemon()
|
||||
while (numdirtybuffers > lodirtybuffers) {
|
||||
if (buf_do_flush(NULL) == 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_UNCHANGED);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_USER);
|
||||
}
|
||||
lodirtybuffers = lodirtysave;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ __mnt_vnode_next(struct vnode **mvp, struct mount *mp)
|
||||
KASSERT((*mvp)->v_mount == mp, ("marker vnode mount list mismatch"));
|
||||
if (should_yield()) {
|
||||
MNT_IUNLOCK(mp);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_UNCHANGED);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_USER);
|
||||
MNT_ILOCK(mp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
vp = TAILQ_NEXT(*mvp, v_nmntvnodes);
|
||||
|
@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ next_iter:
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
MNT_IUNLOCK(mp);
|
||||
yield:
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_UNCHANGED);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_USER);
|
||||
relock_mnt:
|
||||
MNT_ILOCK(mp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ vnlru_proc(void)
|
||||
vnlru_nowhere++;
|
||||
tsleep(vnlruproc, PPAUSE, "vlrup", hz * 3);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_UNCHANGED);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_USER);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4635,7 +4635,7 @@ __mnt_vnode_next_all(struct vnode **mvp, struct mount *mp)
|
||||
struct vnode *vp;
|
||||
|
||||
if (should_yield())
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_UNCHANGED);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_USER);
|
||||
MNT_ILOCK(mp);
|
||||
KASSERT((*mvp)->v_mount == mp, ("marker vnode mount list mismatch"));
|
||||
vp = TAILQ_NEXT(*mvp, v_nmntvnodes);
|
||||
@ -4784,7 +4784,7 @@ __mnt_vnode_next_active(struct vnode **mvp, struct mount *mp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
if (should_yield())
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_UNCHANGED);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_USER);
|
||||
mtx_lock(&vnode_free_list_mtx);
|
||||
return (mnt_vnode_next_active(mvp, mp));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ softdep_process_worklist(mp, full)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (should_yield()) {
|
||||
FREE_LOCK(&lk);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_UNCHANGED);
|
||||
kern_yield(PRI_USER);
|
||||
bwillwrite();
|
||||
ACQUIRE_LOCK(&lk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user