d/freebsd-skq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

If we're doing a kickpcu, make sure we flush the whole RX list rather than

Browse Source 
stopping after 128 frames.

Whilst here, add in some code that lets me optionally flip back to the
original behaviour of calling ath_startrecv().
This commit is contained in:
adrian 2013-01-13 22:41:58 +00:00
parent adc48be9c2
commit 0e0daccc72
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
sys/dev/ath/if_ath_rx.c
View File

@ -845,6 +845,7 @@ ath_rx_proc(struct ath_softc *sc, int resched)
int16_t nf;
u_int64_t tsf;
int npkts = 0;
int kickpcu = 0;
/* XXX we must not hold the ATH_LOCK here */
ATH_UNLOCK_ASSERT(sc);
@ -852,6 +853,7 @@ ath_rx_proc(struct ath_softc *sc, int resched)
ATH_PCU_LOCK(sc);
sc->sc_rxproc_cnt++;
kickpcu = sc->sc_kickpcu;
ATH_PCU_UNLOCK(sc);
DPRINTF(sc, ATH_DEBUG_RX_PROC, "%s: called\n", __func__);
@ -866,7 +868,7 @@ ath_rx_proc(struct ath_softc *sc, int resched)
* latency can jump by quite a bit, causing throughput
* degredation.
*/
if (npkts >= ATH_RX_MAX)
if (!kickpcu && npkts >= ATH_RX_MAX)
break;
bf = TAILQ_FIRST(&sc->sc_rxbuf);
@ -961,6 +963,9 @@ rx_proc_next:
__func__, npkts);
/* XXX rxslink? */
#if 0
ath_startrecv(sc);
#else
/*
* XXX can we hold the PCU lock here?
* Are there any net80211 buffer calls involved?
@ -970,6 +975,7 @@ rx_proc_next:
ath_hal_rxena(ah); /* enable recv descriptors */
ath_mode_init(sc); /* set filters, etc. */
ath_hal_startpcurecv(ah); /* re-enable PCU/DMA engine */
#endif
ath_hal_intrset(ah, sc->sc_imask);
sc->sc_kickpcu = 0;