From 0f9e825508458c813f18229807b32e823cbc1e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pfg <pfg@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 03:19:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ndis(4): it's rather unrealistic to expect a size_t here.

int was actually OK, and u_int is more than enough.
---
 sys/compat/ndis/subr_ndis.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sys/compat/ndis/subr_ndis.c b/sys/compat/ndis/subr_ndis.c
index b66fd35aaa4d..c898f067d3dd 100644
--- a/sys/compat/ndis/subr_ndis.c
+++ b/sys/compat/ndis/subr_ndis.c
@@ -2670,7 +2670,7 @@ ndis_find_sym(lf, filename, suffix, sym)
 {
 	char			*fullsym;
 	char			*suf;
-	size_t			i;
+	u_int			i;
 
 	fullsym = ExAllocatePoolWithTag(NonPagedPool, MAXPATHLEN, 0);
 	if (fullsym == NULL)