MFV r353615: 9485 Optimize possible split block search space

illumos/illumos-gate@a21fe34979
a21fe34979

https://www.illumos.org/issues/9485
  Port this commit from ZoL:
  4589f3ae4c

Author: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Obtained from:	illumos, ZoL
MFC after:	3 weeks
This commit is contained in:
Andriy Gapon 2019-10-16 06:43:22 +00:00
commit 179e6dab09
2 changed files with 308 additions and 101 deletions

View File

@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ extern boolean_t zfs_compressed_arc_enabled;
extern boolean_t zfs_abd_scatter_enabled;
extern int dmu_object_alloc_chunk_shift;
extern boolean_t zfs_force_some_double_word_sm_entries;
extern unsigned long zfs_reconstruct_indirect_damage_fraction;
static ztest_shared_opts_t *ztest_shared_opts;
static ztest_shared_opts_t ztest_opts;
@ -5696,7 +5697,8 @@ ztest_run_zdb(char *pool)
isa = strdup(isa);
/* LINTED */
(void) sprintf(bin,
"/usr/sbin%.*s/zdb -bcc%s%s -G -d -U %s %s",
"/usr/sbin%.*s/zdb -bcc%s%s -G -d -U %s "
"-o zfs_reconstruct_indirect_combinations_max=65536 %s",
isalen,
isa,
ztest_opts.zo_verbose >= 3 ? "s" : "",
@ -6653,6 +6655,13 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
*/
zfs_force_some_double_word_sm_entries = B_TRUE;
/*
* Verify that even extensively damaged split blocks with many
* segments can be reconstructed in a reasonable amount of time
* when reconstruction is known to be possible.
*/
zfs_reconstruct_indirect_damage_fraction = 4;
ztest_fd_rand = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY);
ASSERT3S(ztest_fd_rand, >=, 0);

View File

@ -206,17 +206,21 @@ uint64_t zfs_condense_min_mapping_bytes = 128 * 1024;
int zfs_condense_indirect_commit_entry_delay_ticks = 0;
/*
* If a split block contains more than this many segments, consider it too
* computationally expensive to check all (2^num_segments) possible
* combinations. Instead, try at most 2^_segments_max randomly-selected
* combinations.
*
* This is reasonable if only a few segment copies are damaged and the
* majority of segment copies are good. This allows all the segment copies to
* participate fairly in the reconstruction and prevents the repeated use of
* one bad copy.
* If an indirect split block contains more than this many possible unique
* combinations when being reconstructed, consider it too computationally
* expensive to check them all. Instead, try at most 100 randomly-selected
* combinations each time the block is accessed. This allows all segment
* copies to participate fairly in the reconstruction when all combinations
* cannot be checked and prevents repeated use of one bad copy.
*/
int zfs_reconstruct_indirect_segments_max = 10;
int zfs_reconstruct_indirect_combinations_max = 256;
/*
* Enable to simulate damaged segments and validate reconstruction.
* Used by ztest
*/
unsigned long zfs_reconstruct_indirect_damage_fraction = 0;
/*
* The indirect_child_t represents the vdev that we will read from, when we
@ -228,6 +232,13 @@ int zfs_reconstruct_indirect_segments_max = 10;
typedef struct indirect_child {
abd_t *ic_data;
vdev_t *ic_vdev;
/*
* ic_duplicate is NULL when the ic_data contents are unique, when it
* is determined to be a duplicate it references the primary child.
*/
struct indirect_child *ic_duplicate;
list_node_t ic_node; /* node on is_unique_child */
} indirect_child_t;
/*
@ -249,12 +260,14 @@ typedef struct indirect_split {
uint64_t is_target_offset; /* offset on is_vdev */
uint64_t is_size;
int is_children; /* number of entries in is_child[] */
int is_unique_children; /* number of entries in is_unique_child */
list_t is_unique_child;
/*
* is_good_child is the child that we are currently using to
* attempt reconstruction.
*/
int is_good_child;
indirect_child_t *is_good_child;
indirect_child_t is_child[1]; /* variable-length */
} indirect_split_t;
@ -266,6 +279,9 @@ typedef struct indirect_split {
typedef struct indirect_vsd {
boolean_t iv_split_block;
boolean_t iv_reconstruct;
uint64_t iv_unique_combinations;
uint64_t iv_attempts;
uint64_t iv_attempts_max;
list_t iv_splits; /* list of indirect_split_t's */
} indirect_vsd_t;
@ -283,6 +299,13 @@ vdev_indirect_map_free(zio_t *zio)
abd_free(ic->ic_data);
}
list_remove(&iv->iv_splits, is);
indirect_child_t *ic;
while ((ic = list_head(&is->is_unique_child)) != NULL)
list_remove(&is->is_unique_child, ic);
list_destroy(&is->is_unique_child);
kmem_free(is,
offsetof(indirect_split_t, is_child[is->is_children]));
}
@ -1181,6 +1204,8 @@ vdev_indirect_gather_splits(uint64_t split_offset, vdev_t *vd, uint64_t offset,
is->is_split_offset = split_offset;
is->is_target_offset = offset;
is->is_vdev = vd;
list_create(&is->is_unique_child, sizeof (indirect_child_t),
offsetof(indirect_child_t, ic_node));
/*
* Note that we only consider multiple copies of the data for
@ -1191,6 +1216,7 @@ vdev_indirect_gather_splits(uint64_t split_offset, vdev_t *vd, uint64_t offset,
if (vd->vdev_ops == &vdev_mirror_ops) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
is->is_child[i].ic_vdev = vd->vdev_child[i];
list_link_init(&is->is_child[i].ic_node);
}
} else {
is->is_child[0].ic_vdev = vd;
@ -1243,6 +1269,7 @@ vdev_indirect_read_all(zio_t *zio)
ic->ic_data = abd_alloc_sametype(zio->io_abd,
is->is_size);
ic->ic_duplicate = NULL;
zio_nowait(zio_vdev_child_io(zio, NULL,
ic->ic_vdev, is->is_target_offset, ic->ic_data,
@ -1364,7 +1391,7 @@ vdev_indirect_checksum_error(zio_t *zio,
zio_bad_cksum_t zbc = { 0 };
void *bad_buf = abd_borrow_buf_copy(ic->ic_data, is->is_size);
abd_t *good_abd = is->is_child[is->is_good_child].ic_data;
abd_t *good_abd = is->is_good_child->ic_data;
void *good_buf = abd_borrow_buf_copy(good_abd, is->is_size);
zfs_ereport_post_checksum(zio->io_spa, vd, zio,
is->is_target_offset, is->is_size, good_buf, bad_buf, &zbc);
@ -1397,21 +1424,18 @@ vdev_indirect_repair(zio_t *zio)
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
indirect_child_t *good_child = &is->is_child[is->is_good_child];
for (int c = 0; c < is->is_children; c++) {
indirect_child_t *ic = &is->is_child[c];
if (ic == good_child)
if (ic == is->is_good_child)
continue;
if (ic->ic_data == NULL)
continue;
if (abd_cmp(good_child->ic_data, ic->ic_data,
is->is_size) == 0)
if (ic->ic_duplicate == is->is_good_child)
continue;
zio_nowait(zio_vdev_child_io(zio, NULL,
ic->ic_vdev, is->is_target_offset,
good_child->ic_data, is->is_size,
is->is_good_child->ic_data, is->is_size,
ZIO_TYPE_WRITE, ZIO_PRIORITY_ASYNC_WRITE,
ZIO_FLAG_IO_REPAIR | ZIO_FLAG_SELF_HEAL,
NULL, NULL));
@ -1453,21 +1477,194 @@ vdev_indirect_all_checksum_errors(zio_t *zio)
}
}
/*
* Copy data from all the splits to a main zio then validate the checksum.
* If then checksum is successfully validated return success.
*/
static int
vdev_indirect_splits_checksum_validate(indirect_vsd_t *iv, zio_t *zio)
{
zio_bad_cksum_t zbc;
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
ASSERT3P(is->is_good_child->ic_data, !=, NULL);
ASSERT3P(is->is_good_child->ic_duplicate, ==, NULL);
abd_copy_off(zio->io_abd, is->is_good_child->ic_data,
is->is_split_offset, 0, is->is_size);
}
return (zio_checksum_error(zio, &zbc));
}
/*
* There are relatively few possible combinations making it feasible to
* deterministically check them all. We do this by setting the good_child
* to the next unique split version. If we reach the end of the list then
* "carry over" to the next unique split version (like counting in base
* is_unique_children, but each digit can have a different base).
*/
static int
vdev_indirect_splits_enumerate_all(indirect_vsd_t *iv, zio_t *zio)
{
boolean_t more = B_TRUE;
iv->iv_attempts = 0;
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is))
is->is_good_child = list_head(&is->is_unique_child);
while (more == B_TRUE) {
iv->iv_attempts++;
more = B_FALSE;
if (vdev_indirect_splits_checksum_validate(iv, zio) == 0)
return (0);
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
is->is_good_child = list_next(&is->is_unique_child,
is->is_good_child);
if (is->is_good_child != NULL) {
more = B_TRUE;
break;
}
is->is_good_child = list_head(&is->is_unique_child);
}
}
ASSERT3S(iv->iv_attempts, <=, iv->iv_unique_combinations);
return (SET_ERROR(ECKSUM));
}
/*
* There are too many combinations to try all of them in a reasonable amount
* of time. So try a fixed number of random combinations from the unique
* split versions, after which we'll consider the block unrecoverable.
*/
static int
vdev_indirect_splits_enumerate_randomly(indirect_vsd_t *iv, zio_t *zio)
{
iv->iv_attempts = 0;
while (iv->iv_attempts < iv->iv_attempts_max) {
iv->iv_attempts++;
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
indirect_child_t *ic = list_head(&is->is_unique_child);
int children = is->is_unique_children;
for (int i = spa_get_random(children); i > 0; i--)
ic = list_next(&is->is_unique_child, ic);
ASSERT3P(ic, !=, NULL);
is->is_good_child = ic;
}
if (vdev_indirect_splits_checksum_validate(iv, zio) == 0)
return (0);
}
return (SET_ERROR(ECKSUM));
}
/*
* This is a validation function for reconstruction. It randomly selects
* a good combination, if one can be found, and then it intentionally
* damages all other segment copes by zeroing them. This forces the
* reconstruction algorithm to locate the one remaining known good copy.
*/
static int
vdev_indirect_splits_damage(indirect_vsd_t *iv, zio_t *zio)
{
/* Presume all the copies are unique for initial selection. */
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
is->is_unique_children = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < is->is_children; i++) {
indirect_child_t *ic = &is->is_child[i];
if (ic->ic_data != NULL) {
is->is_unique_children++;
list_insert_tail(&is->is_unique_child, ic);
}
}
}
/*
* Set each is_good_child to a randomly-selected child which
* is known to contain validated data.
*/
int error = vdev_indirect_splits_enumerate_randomly(iv, zio);
if (error)
goto out;
/*
* Damage all but the known good copy by zeroing it. This will
* result in two or less unique copies per indirect_child_t.
* Both may need to be checked in order to reconstruct the block.
* Set iv->iv_attempts_max such that all unique combinations will
* enumerated, but limit the damage to at most 16 indirect splits.
*/
iv->iv_attempts_max = 1;
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
for (int c = 0; c < is->is_children; c++) {
indirect_child_t *ic = &is->is_child[c];
if (ic == is->is_good_child)
continue;
if (ic->ic_data == NULL)
continue;
abd_zero(ic->ic_data, ic->ic_data->abd_size);
}
iv->iv_attempts_max *= 2;
if (iv->iv_attempts_max > (1ULL << 16)) {
iv->iv_attempts_max = UINT64_MAX;
break;
}
}
out:
/* Empty the unique children lists so they can be reconstructed. */
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
indirect_child_t *ic;
while ((ic = list_head(&is->is_unique_child)) != NULL)
list_remove(&is->is_unique_child, ic);
is->is_unique_children = 0;
}
return (error);
}
/*
* This function is called when we have read all copies of the data and need
* to try to find a combination of copies that gives us the right checksum.
*
* If we pointed to any mirror vdevs, this effectively does the job of the
* mirror. The mirror vdev code can't do its own job because we don't know
* the checksum of each split segment individually. We have to try every
* combination of copies of split segments, until we find one that checksums
* correctly. (Or until we have tried all combinations, or have tried
* 2^zfs_reconstruct_indirect_segments_max combinations. In these cases we
* set io_error to ECKSUM to propagate the error up to the user.)
* the checksum of each split segment individually.
*
* For example, if we have 3 segments in the split,
* and each points to a 2-way mirror, we will have the following pieces of
* data:
* We have to try every unique combination of copies of split segments, until
* we find one that checksums correctly. Duplicate segment copies are first
* identified and latter skipped during reconstruction. This optimization
* reduces the search space and ensures that of the remaining combinations
* at most one is correct.
*
* When the total number of combinations is small they can all be checked.
* For example, if we have 3 segments in the split, and each points to a
* 2-way mirror with unique copies, we will have the following pieces of data:
*
* | mirror child
* split | [0] [1]
@ -1494,10 +1691,10 @@ vdev_indirect_all_checksum_errors(zio_t *zio)
* data_A_1 data_B_1 data_C_1
*
* Note that the split segments may be on the same or different top-level
* vdevs. In either case, we try lots of combinations (see
* zfs_reconstruct_indirect_segments_max). This ensures that if a mirror has
* small silent errors on all of its children, we can still reconstruct the
* correct data, as long as those errors are at sufficiently-separated
* vdevs. In either case, we may need to try lots of combinations (see
* zfs_reconstruct_indirect_combinations_max). This ensures that if a mirror
* has small silent errors on all of its children, we can still reconstruct
* the correct data, as long as those errors are at sufficiently-separated
* offsets (specifically, separated by the largest block size - default of
* 128KB, but up to 16MB).
*/
@ -1505,90 +1702,91 @@ static void
vdev_indirect_reconstruct_io_done(zio_t *zio)
{
indirect_vsd_t *iv = zio->io_vsd;
uint64_t attempts = 0;
uint64_t attempts_max = 1ULL << zfs_reconstruct_indirect_segments_max;
int segments = 0;
boolean_t known_good = B_FALSE;
int error;
iv->iv_unique_combinations = 1;
iv->iv_attempts_max = UINT64_MAX;
if (zfs_reconstruct_indirect_combinations_max > 0)
iv->iv_attempts_max = zfs_reconstruct_indirect_combinations_max;
/*
* If nonzero, every 1/x blocks will be damaged, in order to validate
* reconstruction when there are split segments with damaged copies.
* Known_good will TRUE when reconstruction is known to be possible.
*/
if (zfs_reconstruct_indirect_damage_fraction != 0 &&
spa_get_random(zfs_reconstruct_indirect_damage_fraction) == 0)
known_good = (vdev_indirect_splits_damage(iv, zio) == 0);
/*
* Determine the unique children for a split segment and add them
* to the is_unique_child list. By restricting reconstruction
* to these children, only unique combinations will be considered.
* This can vastly reduce the search space when there are a large
* number of indirect splits.
*/
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is))
segments++;
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
is->is_unique_children = 0;
for (;;) {
/* copy data from splits to main zio */
int ret;
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
for (int i = 0; i < is->is_children; i++) {
indirect_child_t *ic_i = &is->is_child[i];
/*
* If this child failed, its ic_data will be NULL.
* Skip this combination.
*/
if (is->is_child[is->is_good_child].ic_data == NULL) {
ret = EIO;
goto next;
}
if (ic_i->ic_data == NULL ||
ic_i->ic_duplicate != NULL)
continue;
abd_copy_off(zio->io_abd,
is->is_child[is->is_good_child].ic_data,
is->is_split_offset, 0, is->is_size);
}
for (int j = i + 1; j < is->is_children; j++) {
indirect_child_t *ic_j = &is->is_child[j];
/* See if this checksum matches. */
zio_bad_cksum_t zbc;
ret = zio_checksum_error(zio, &zbc);
if (ret == 0) {
/* Found a matching checksum. Issue repair i/os. */
vdev_indirect_repair(zio);
zio_checksum_verified(zio);
return;
}
if (ic_j->ic_data == NULL ||
ic_j->ic_duplicate != NULL)
continue;
/*
* Checksum failed; try a different combination of split
* children.
*/
boolean_t more;
next:
more = B_FALSE;
if (segments <= zfs_reconstruct_indirect_segments_max) {
/*
* There are relatively few segments, so
* deterministically check all combinations. We do
* this by by adding one to the first split's
* good_child. If it overflows, then "carry over" to
* the next split (like counting in base is_children,
* but each digit can have a different base).
*/
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
is->is_good_child++;
if (is->is_good_child < is->is_children) {
more = B_TRUE;
break;
if (abd_cmp(ic_i->ic_data, ic_j->ic_data,
is->is_size) == 0) {
ic_j->ic_duplicate = ic_i;
}
is->is_good_child = 0;
}
} else if (++attempts < attempts_max) {
/*
* There are too many combinations to try all of them
* in a reasonable amount of time, so try a fixed
* number of random combinations, after which we'll
* consider the block unrecoverable.
*/
for (indirect_split_t *is = list_head(&iv->iv_splits);
is != NULL; is = list_next(&iv->iv_splits, is)) {
is->is_good_child =
spa_get_random(is->is_children);
}
more = B_TRUE;
is->is_unique_children++;
list_insert_tail(&is->is_unique_child, ic_i);
}
if (!more) {
/* All combinations failed. */
zio->io_error = ret;
/* Reconstruction is impossible, no valid children */
EQUIV(list_is_empty(&is->is_unique_child),
is->is_unique_children == 0);
if (list_is_empty(&is->is_unique_child)) {
zio->io_error = EIO;
vdev_indirect_all_checksum_errors(zio);
zio_checksum_verified(zio);
return;
}
iv->iv_unique_combinations *= is->is_unique_children;
}
if (iv->iv_unique_combinations <= iv->iv_attempts_max)
error = vdev_indirect_splits_enumerate_all(iv, zio);
else
error = vdev_indirect_splits_enumerate_randomly(iv, zio);
if (error != 0) {
/* All attempted combinations failed. */
ASSERT3B(known_good, ==, B_FALSE);
zio->io_error = error;
vdev_indirect_all_checksum_errors(zio);
} else {
/*
* The checksum has been successfully validated. Issue
* repair I/Os to any copies of splits which don't match
* the validated version.
*/
ASSERT0(vdev_indirect_splits_checksum_validate(iv, zio));
vdev_indirect_repair(zio);
zio_checksum_verified(zio);
}
}