seqc: predict false for _in_modify and type fixes for _consistent_*
seqc_consistent_* return bool, not seqc. [0] While here annotate the rarely true condition - it is expected to run into it on vare occasion (compared to the other case). Reported by: oshogbo [0] Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
This commit is contained in:
parent
39f2ea05bf
commit
17d1470975
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ seqc_read(const seqc_t *seqcp)
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
ret = atomic_load_acq_int(__DECONST(seqc_t *, seqcp));
|
||||
if (seqc_in_modify(ret)) {
|
||||
if (__predict_false(seqc_in_modify(ret))) {
|
||||
cpu_spinwait();
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -88,14 +88,14 @@ seqc_read(const seqc_t *seqcp)
|
||||
return (ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline seqc_t
|
||||
static __inline bool
|
||||
seqc_consistent_nomb(const seqc_t *seqcp, seqc_t oldseqc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
return (*seqcp == oldseqc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline seqc_t
|
||||
static __inline bool
|
||||
seqc_consistent(const seqc_t *seqcp, seqc_t oldseqc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user