From 2060f8bb26dc4230327b1a81a60b60300719ee15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: nwhitehorn Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:24:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix an obvious lock escape and fix a typo in a comment. --- sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c b/sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c index 4e74572db95a..cf64af19f9f8 100644 --- a/sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c +++ b/sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c @@ -1664,8 +1664,10 @@ moea64_page_exists_quick(mmu_t mmu, pmap_t pmap, vm_page_t m) loops = 0; LOCK_TABLE(); LIST_FOREACH(pvo, vm_page_to_pvoh(m), pvo_vlink) { - if (pvo->pvo_pmap == pmap) + if (pvo->pvo_pmap == pmap) { + UNLOCK_TABLE(); return (TRUE); + } if (++loops >= 16) break; } @@ -2063,7 +2065,7 @@ moea64_pvo_enter(pmap_t pm, uma_zone_t zone, struct pvo_head *pvo_head, bootstrap = 1; } else { /* - * Note: drop the table around the UMA allocation in + * Note: drop the table lock around the UMA allocation in * case the UMA allocator needs to manipulate the page * table. The mapping we are working with is already * protected by the PMAP lock.