From 21967caaf20a0e02ee5864ca4d372e88b8f85159 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vanhu Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:12:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Spelling fix in a comment Approved by: gnn(mentor) --- sys/netipsec/key.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sys/netipsec/key.c b/sys/netipsec/key.c index cbaa060b318d..256bdfe0f630 100644 --- a/sys/netipsec/key.c +++ b/sys/netipsec/key.c @@ -4164,7 +4164,7 @@ key_flush_sad(time_t now) /* * Actually, only send expire message if SA has been used, as it * was done before, but should we always send such message, and let IKE - * daemon decide if it should be renegociated or not ? + * daemon decide if it should be renegotiated or not ? * XXX expire message will actually NOT be sent if SA is only used * after soft lifetime has been reached, see below (DYING state) */