Prefer a more traditional spelling of inhibited in comments and panic

messages.
This commit is contained in:
rwatson 2006-12-31 15:56:04 +00:00
parent 75d8013fc1
commit 2a3330b81a
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ setrunqueue(struct thread *td, int flags)
curthread->td_proc->p_comm);
mtx_assert(&sched_lock, MA_OWNED);
KASSERT((td->td_inhibitors == 0),
("setrunqueue: trying to run inhibitted thread"));
("setrunqueue: trying to run inhibited thread"));
KASSERT((TD_CAN_RUN(td) || TD_IS_RUNNING(td)),
("setrunqueue: bad thread state"));
TD_SET_RUNQ(td);
@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ maybe_preempt(struct thread *td)
KASSERT ((ctd->td_sched != NULL && ctd->td_sched->ts_thread == ctd),
("thread has no (or wrong) sched-private part."));
KASSERT((td->td_inhibitors == 0),
("maybe_preempt: trying to run inhibitted thread"));
("maybe_preempt: trying to run inhibited thread"));
pri = td->td_priority;
cpri = ctd->td_priority;
if (panicstr != NULL || pri >= cpri || cold /* || dumping */ ||

View File

@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ thread_single(int mode)
if (TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td2))
continue;
/*
* maybe other inhibitted states too?
* maybe other inhibited states too?
*/
if ((td2->td_flags & TDF_SINTR) &&
(td2->td_inhibitors &

View File

@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ sched_switch(struct thread *td, struct thread *newtd, int flags)
* * A followon
*/
KASSERT((newtd->td_inhibitors == 0),
("trying to run inhibitted thread"));
("trying to run inhibited thread"));
newtd->td_sched->ts_flags |= TSF_DIDRUN;
TD_SET_RUNNING(newtd);
if ((newtd->td_proc->p_flag & P_NOLOAD) == 0)