Orphaning provider with EXDEV seems weird; perhaps the author meant
ENXIO here?
This commit is contained in:
parent
31d083f28a
commit
2c9565c3a6
@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ fdc_worker(struct fdc_data *fdc)
|
||||
fd->flags |= FD_NEWDISK;
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&fdc->fdc_mtx);
|
||||
g_topology_lock();
|
||||
g_orphan_provider(fd->fd_provider, EXDEV);
|
||||
g_orphan_provider(fd->fd_provider, ENXIO);
|
||||
fd->fd_provider->flags |= G_PF_WITHER;
|
||||
fd->fd_provider =
|
||||
g_new_providerf(fd->fd_geom, fd->fd_geom->name);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user