- In sched_add() special case PRI_TIMESHARE and PRI_ITHD|PRI_REALTIME. We
always place ITHD & REALTIME threads on the current queue of the current cpu. Prior to this change an interrupt thread would only ever run on one cpu.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0f35853d0
commit
2d1c8006af
@ -176,8 +176,7 @@ sched_slp_ratio(int b, int s)
|
||||
* XXX nice value should effect how interactive a kg is.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define SCHED_CURR(kg) (((kg)->kg_slptime > (kg)->kg_runtime && \
|
||||
sched_slp_ratio((kg)->kg_slptime, (kg)->kg_runtime) > 4) || \
|
||||
(kg)->kg_pri_class != PRI_TIMESHARE)
|
||||
sched_slp_ratio((kg)->kg_slptime, (kg)->kg_runtime) > 4))
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Cpu percentage computation macros and defines.
|
||||
@ -808,13 +807,27 @@ sched_add(struct kse *ke)
|
||||
KASSERT(ke->ke_proc->p_sflag & PS_INMEM,
|
||||
("sched_add: process swapped out"));
|
||||
|
||||
kseq = KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Timeshare threads get placed on the appropriate queue on their
|
||||
* bound cpu.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ke->ke_ksegrp->kg_pri_class == PRI_TIMESHARE) {
|
||||
kseq = KSEQ_CPU(ke->ke_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ke->ke_runq == NULL) {
|
||||
if (SCHED_CURR(ke->ke_ksegrp))
|
||||
ke->ke_runq = kseq->ksq_curr;
|
||||
else
|
||||
ke->ke_runq = kseq->ksq_next;
|
||||
if (ke->ke_runq == NULL) {
|
||||
if (SCHED_CURR(ke->ke_ksegrp))
|
||||
ke->ke_runq = kseq->ksq_curr;
|
||||
else
|
||||
ke->ke_runq = kseq->ksq_next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we're a real-time or interrupt thread place us on the curr
|
||||
* queue for the current processor. Hopefully this will yield the
|
||||
* lowest latency response.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
kseq = KSEQ_SELF();
|
||||
ke->ke_runq = kseq->ksq_curr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ke->ke_ksegrp->kg_runq_kses++;
|
||||
ke->ke_state = KES_ONRUNQ;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user