In r118390, the swap pager's approach to striping swap allocation over
multiple devices was changed. However, swapoff_one() was not fully and correctly converted. In particular, with r118390's introduction of a per- device blist, the maximum swap block size, "dmmax", became irrelevant to swapoff_one()'s operation. Moreover, swapoff_one() was performing out-of- range operations on the per-device blist that were silently ignored by blist_fill(). This change corrects both of these problems with swapoff_one(), which will allow us to potentially increase MAX_PAGEOUT_CLUSTER. Previously, swapoff_one() would panic inside of blist_fill() if you increased MAX_PAGEOUT_CLUSTER. Reviewed by: kib, markj MFC after: 3 days
This commit is contained in:
parent
920fd40ca7
commit
33fb89b4ed
@ -2310,9 +2310,13 @@ swapoff_one(struct swdevt *sp, struct ucred *cred)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mtx_lock(&sw_dev_mtx);
|
||||
sp->sw_flags |= SW_CLOSING;
|
||||
for (dvbase = 0; dvbase < sp->sw_end; dvbase += dmmax) {
|
||||
for (dvbase = 0; dvbase < nblks; dvbase += BLIST_BMAP_RADIX) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* blist_fill() cannot allocate more than BLIST_BMAP_RADIX
|
||||
* blocks per call.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
swap_pager_avail -= blist_fill(sp->sw_blist,
|
||||
dvbase, dmmax);
|
||||
dvbase, ulmin(nblks - dvbase, BLIST_BMAP_RADIX));
|
||||
}
|
||||
swap_total -= (vm_ooffset_t)nblks * PAGE_SIZE;
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&sw_dev_mtx);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user