Fix clang 6.0.0 compiler warnings in binutils

Latest clang git has a warning -Wnull-pointer-arithmetic which will
trigger a -Werror failure. Addition and subtraction from a null pointer
is undefined behaviour and could be optimized into anything.

Furthermore, using the difference between two pointers and casting the
result back to a pointer is not portable since the size of ptrdiff_t
does not necessary have to be the same as size of void* (this happens
e.g. on CHERI). Using intptr_t instead fixes this portability issue and
the compiler warning.

Submitted by;	Alexander Richardson
Obtained from:	CheriBSD
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12928
MFC after:	3 days
This commit is contained in:
Dimitry Andric 2017-12-24 16:51:59 +00:00
parent 96289d0961
commit 34f4d02c2f
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -4815,7 +4815,7 @@ _bfd_elf_archive_symbol_lookup (bfd *abfd,
len = strlen (name);
copy = bfd_alloc (abfd, len);
if (copy == NULL)
return (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) 0 - 1;
return (struct elf_link_hash_entry *)(intptr_t)-1;
first = p - name + 1;
memcpy (copy, name, first);
@ -4927,7 +4927,7 @@ elf_link_add_archive_symbols (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
}
h = archive_symbol_lookup (abfd, info, symdef->name);
if (h == (struct elf_link_hash_entry *) 0 - 1)
if (h == (struct elf_link_hash_entry *)(intptr_t)-1)
goto error_return;
if (h == NULL)

View File

@ -119,11 +119,11 @@ extern "C" {
may ignore the byte-within-word field of the pointer. */
#ifndef __PTR_TO_INT
# define __PTR_TO_INT(P) ((P) - (char *) 0)
# define __PTR_TO_INT(P) ((intptr_t)(P))
#endif
#ifndef __INT_TO_PTR
# define __INT_TO_PTR(P) ((P) + (char *) 0)
# define __INT_TO_PTR(P) ((void*)(intptr_t)(P))
#endif
/* We need the type of the resulting object. If __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ is
@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ __extension__ \
__o1->maybe_empty_object = 1; \
__o1->next_free \
= __INT_TO_PTR ((__PTR_TO_INT (__o1->next_free)+__o1->alignment_mask)\
& ~ (__o1->alignment_mask)); \
& ~(intptr_t)(__o1->alignment_mask)); \
if (__o1->next_free - (char *)__o1->chunk \
> __o1->chunk_limit - (char *)__o1->chunk) \
__o1->next_free = __o1->chunk_limit; \