If a file is specifically both included and excluded, then:
* It is not extracted (because it is excluded) * If it's not present in the archive, then an error is reported (because the file was requested and not found) * If it is present in the archive, no error is reported. Previously, this would always report an error because the exclusion prevented the entry from matching the inclusion. Also, tar is now more reluctant to report unmatched inclusions. Previously, "tar x file1 'file*'" against an archive that contained a single entry "file1" would match file1 and then report an error for the second pattern because it wasn't matched. It now considers both inclusions to be matched and reports no error.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c769e1be01
commit
37ba5a9b14
@ -156,39 +156,40 @@ lafe_excluded(struct lafe_matching *matching, const char *pathname)
|
||||
if (matching == NULL)
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Mark off any unmatched inclusions. */
|
||||
/* In particular, if a filename does appear in the archive and
|
||||
* is explicitly included and excluded, then we don't report
|
||||
* it as missing even though we don't extract it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
matched = NULL;
|
||||
for (match = matching->inclusions; match != NULL; match = match->next){
|
||||
if (match->matches == 0
|
||||
&& match_inclusion(match, pathname)) {
|
||||
matching->inclusions_unmatched_count--;
|
||||
match->matches++;
|
||||
matched = match;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Exclusions take priority */
|
||||
for (match = matching->exclusions; match != NULL; match = match->next){
|
||||
if (match_exclusion(match, pathname))
|
||||
return (1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Then check for inclusions */
|
||||
matched = NULL;
|
||||
for (match = matching->inclusions; match != NULL; match = match->next){
|
||||
if (match_inclusion(match, pathname)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If this pattern has never been matched,
|
||||
* then we're done.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (match->matches == 0) {
|
||||
match->matches++;
|
||||
matching->inclusions_unmatched_count--;
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Otherwise, remember the match but keep checking
|
||||
* in case we can tick off an unmatched pattern.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
matched = match;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We didn't find a pattern that had never been matched, but
|
||||
* we did find a match, so count it and exit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (matched != NULL) {
|
||||
matched->matches++;
|
||||
/* It's not excluded and we found an inclusion above, so it's included. */
|
||||
if (matched != NULL)
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* We didn't find an unmatched inclusion, check the remaining ones. */
|
||||
for (match = matching->inclusions; match != NULL; match = match->next){
|
||||
/* We looked at previously-unmatched inclusions already. */
|
||||
if (match->matches > 0
|
||||
&& match_inclusion(match, pathname)) {
|
||||
match->matches++;
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If there were inclusions, default is to exclude. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user