MFC r273068:
Rename awk(1) implementation of GNU awk's built-in asorti() function to prevent fatal conflict should one-true-awk ever be replaced -- e.g., in an appliance -- with GNU awk. NB: Renamed my implementation to _asorti()
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1b0091ca7
commit
390b17942b
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ show_include()
|
||||
-v use_color=${USE_COLOR:-0} \
|
||||
-v re="$pattern" \
|
||||
-v show_desc=${SHOW_DESC:-0} '
|
||||
function asorti(src, dest)
|
||||
function _asorti(src, dest)
|
||||
{
|
||||
k = nitems = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ show_include()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
END {
|
||||
n = asorti(syntax, sorted_indices)
|
||||
n = _asorti(syntax, sorted_indices)
|
||||
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
|
||||
printf "%s", syntax[sorted_indices[i]]
|
||||
}' "$file" )
|
||||
|
@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ f_device_shutdown()
|
||||
f_device_sort_by_awk='
|
||||
# Variables that should be defined on the invocation line:
|
||||
# -v prop="property"
|
||||
function asorti(src, dest)
|
||||
function _asorti(src, dest)
|
||||
{
|
||||
k = nitems = 0
|
||||
for (i in src) dest[++nitems] = i
|
||||
@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ function asorti(src, dest)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
END {
|
||||
nitems = asorti(devices, devices_sorted)
|
||||
nitems = _asorti(devices, devices_sorted)
|
||||
for (i = 1; i <= nitems; i++) print devices[devices_sorted[i]]
|
||||
}
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ f_index_read()
|
||||
export msg_packages
|
||||
|
||||
eval "$( debug= f_getvar "$var_to_get" | awk -F'|' '
|
||||
function asorti(src, dest)
|
||||
function _asorti(src, dest)
|
||||
{
|
||||
k = nitems = 0
|
||||
|
||||
@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ f_index_read()
|
||||
END {
|
||||
print "_npkgs=" tpkgs # For convenience, total package count
|
||||
|
||||
n = asorti(categories, categories_sorted)
|
||||
n = _asorti(categories, categories_sorted)
|
||||
|
||||
# Produce package counts for each category
|
||||
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user