Fix the experimental NFS subsystem so that it uses the correct
preprocessor macro name for not requiring strict data alignment. Suggested by: marius MFC after: 2 weeks
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6655439ed
commit
3dfe81c650
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ struct mtx nfs_slock_mutex;
|
||||
/* local functions */
|
||||
static int nfssvc_call(struct thread *, struct nfssvc_args *, struct ucred *);
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__i386__)
|
||||
#ifdef __NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* These architectures don't need re-alignment, so just return.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ newnfs_realign(struct mbuf **pm)
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#else /* !__NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* newnfs_realign:
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ newnfs_realign(struct mbuf **pm)
|
||||
pm = &m->m_next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* !__i386__ */
|
||||
#endif /* __NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef notdef
|
||||
static void
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user