x86: Put other CPUs into tight loop when updating Intel microcode from
loaded OS. This should prevent at least some theoretical issues whith code execution on HT sibling of the core where the update is loaded. Reviewed by: markj Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation MFC after: 1 week Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20201
This commit is contained in:
parent
6c204b3a15
commit
4fb95008ed
@ -330,9 +330,26 @@ cpuctl_do_update(int cpu, cpuctl_update_args_t *data, struct thread *td)
|
||||
return (ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct ucode_update_data {
|
||||
void *ptr;
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
ucode_intel_load_rv(void *arg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ucode_update_data *d;
|
||||
|
||||
d = arg;
|
||||
if (PCPU_GET(cpuid) == d->cpu)
|
||||
d->ret = ucode_intel_load(d->ptr, true, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
update_intel(int cpu, cpuctl_update_args_t *args, struct thread *td)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ucode_update_data d;
|
||||
void *ptr;
|
||||
int is_bound, oldcpu, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -360,12 +377,11 @@ update_intel(int cpu, cpuctl_update_args_t *args, struct thread *td)
|
||||
oldcpu = td->td_oncpu;
|
||||
is_bound = cpu_sched_is_bound(td);
|
||||
set_cpu(cpu, td);
|
||||
critical_enter();
|
||||
|
||||
ret = ucode_intel_load(ptr, true, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
critical_exit();
|
||||
d.ptr = ptr;
|
||||
d.cpu = cpu;
|
||||
smp_rendezvous(NULL, ucode_intel_load_rv, NULL, &d);
|
||||
restore_cpu(oldcpu, is_bound, td);
|
||||
ret = d.ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Replace any existing update. This ensures that the new update
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user