d/freebsd-skq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

I asked Bosko Milekic for help with 'peak' reporting, and he suggested

Browse Source 
using the old 'cached' value but reporting it as 'cached'.

I've decided to report the 'cached' as 'peak', why?  Well because
it is the peak, the peak of what is actually allocated.  'cached'
doesn't make sense to me as a user.
This commit is contained in:
alfred 2003-12-23 14:06:24 +00:00
parent a121c1dfef
commit 52e8917de4
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
usr.bin/netstat/mbuf.c
View File

@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ mbpr(u_long mbaddr, u_long mbtaddr __unused, u_long nmbcaddr, u_long nmbufaddr,
} else { } else {
/* XXX: peak is now wrong. */ /* XXX: peak is now wrong. */
printf("%lu/%lu/%d (current/peak/max):\n", printf("%lu/%lu/%d (current/peak/max):\n",
totused[0], totused[0], nmbufs); totused[0], totnum, nmbufs);
} }
for (i = 0; cflag && i < (num_objs - 1); i++) { for (i = 0; cflag && i < (num_objs - 1); i++) {
@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ mbpr(u_long mbaddr, u_long mbtaddr __unused, u_long nmbcaddr, u_long nmbufaddr,
} else { } else {
/* XXX: peak is now wrong. */ /* XXX: peak is now wrong. */
printf("%lu/%lu/%d (current/peak/max):\n", printf("%lu/%lu/%d (current/peak/max):\n",
totused[1], totused[1], nmbclusters); totused[1], totnum, nmbclusters);
} }
for (i = 0; cflag && i < (num_objs - 1); i++) { for (i = 0; cflag && i < (num_objs - 1); i++) {
if (mbpstat[i]->mb_active == 0) if (mbpstat[i]->mb_active == 0)