Don't specify a function name in the example SDT(9) probe. As with the
module component, it is a bug that the SDT(9) KPI allows one to specify the function component of an SDT probe. Currently, the module component is filled in automatically if left unset; this is not yet true for the function component, but will be addressed by some ongoing work. MFC after: 3 days
This commit is contained in:
parent
25e41e0131
commit
586e7e21a8
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
.\" $FreeBSD$
|
||||
.\"
|
||||
.Dd September 18, 2014
|
||||
.Dd March 8, 2015
|
||||
.Dt SDT 9
|
||||
.Os
|
||||
.Sh NAME
|
||||
@ -196,13 +196,13 @@ They are meant to be added to executable code and can be used to instrument the
|
||||
code in which they are called.
|
||||
.Sh EXAMPLES
|
||||
The following probe definition will create a DTrace probe called
|
||||
.Ql icmp::unreach:pkt-receive ,
|
||||
.Ql icmp:::receive-unreachable ,
|
||||
which would hypothetically be triggered when the kernel receives an ICMP packet
|
||||
of type Destination Unreachable:
|
||||
.Bd -literal -offset indent
|
||||
SDT_PROVIDER_DECLARE(icmp);
|
||||
|
||||
SDT_PROBE_DEFINE1(icmp, , unreach, pkt__receive,
|
||||
SDT_PROBE_DEFINE1(icmp, , , receive__unreachable,
|
||||
"struct icmp *");
|
||||
|
||||
.Ed
|
||||
@ -286,10 +286,10 @@ This manual page was written by
|
||||
.Sh BUGS
|
||||
The
|
||||
.Nm
|
||||
macros allow the module name of a probe to be specified as part of a probe
|
||||
definition.
|
||||
However, the DTrace framework uses the module name of probes to determine
|
||||
which probes should be destroyed when a kernel module is unloaded, so the module
|
||||
macros allow the module and function names of a probe to be specified as part of
|
||||
a probe definition.
|
||||
The DTrace framework uses the module name of probes to determine which probes
|
||||
should be destroyed when a kernel module is unloaded, so the module
|
||||
name of a probe should match the name of the module in which its defined.
|
||||
.Nm
|
||||
will set the module name properly if it is left unspecified in the probe
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user