Bring in OpenSSL checkin 19821:
Make inline assembler clang-friendly [from HEAD]. openssl/crypto/md32_common.h 1.45.2.1 -> 1.45.2.2 openssl/crypto/rc5/rc5_locl.h 1.8 -> 1.8.8.1 Approved by: simon
This commit is contained in:
parent
8aecb90468
commit
62ec0abc3c
@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
|
||||
asm ( \
|
||||
"roll %1,%0" \
|
||||
: "=r"(ret) \
|
||||
: "I"(n), "0"(a) \
|
||||
: "I"(n), "0"((unsigned int)(a)) \
|
||||
: "cc"); \
|
||||
ret; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ int HASH_FINAL (unsigned char *md, HASH_CTX *c)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef MD32_REG_T
|
||||
#if defined(__alpha) || defined(__sparcv9) || defined(__mips)
|
||||
#define MD32_REG_T long
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This comment was originaly written for MD5, which is why it
|
||||
@ -400,9 +401,15 @@ int HASH_FINAL (unsigned char *md, HASH_CTX *c)
|
||||
* Well, to be honest it should say that this *prevents*
|
||||
* performance degradation.
|
||||
* <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
|
||||
* Apparently there're LP64 compilers that generate better
|
||||
* code if A-D are declared int. Most notably GCC-x86_64
|
||||
* generates better code.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Above is not absolute and there are LP64 compilers that
|
||||
* generate better code if MD32_REG_T is defined int. The above
|
||||
* pre-processor condition reflects the circumstances under which
|
||||
* the conclusion was made and is subject to further extension.
|
||||
* <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define MD32_REG_T int
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -154,14 +154,14 @@
|
||||
# define ROTATE_l32(a,n) ({ register unsigned int ret; \
|
||||
asm ("roll %%cl,%0" \
|
||||
: "=r"(ret) \
|
||||
: "c"(n),"0"(a) \
|
||||
: "c"(n),"0"((unsigned int)(a)) \
|
||||
: "cc"); \
|
||||
ret; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
# define ROTATE_r32(a,n) ({ register unsigned int ret; \
|
||||
asm ("rorl %%cl,%0" \
|
||||
: "=r"(ret) \
|
||||
: "c"(n),"0"(a) \
|
||||
: "c"(n),"0"((unsigned int)(a)) \
|
||||
: "cc"); \
|
||||
ret; \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user