Fix an inconsistency I just ran into for LDADD and DPADD. The description
for both of them use different, and presumably wrong, variables in the example. They set LDFILES and SRCLIB respectively. I guess that's what DPADD and LDADD were called first ...
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7223eeffb
commit
64b0ebf1a2
@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ LDADD Additional loader objects. Usually used for libraries.
|
||||
For example, to load with the compatibility and utility
|
||||
libraries, use:
|
||||
|
||||
LDFILES=-lutil -lcompat
|
||||
LDADD=-lutil -lcompat
|
||||
|
||||
LDFLAGS Additional loader flags.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ DPADD Additional dependencies for the program. Usually used for
|
||||
libraries. For example, to depend on the compatibility and
|
||||
utility libraries use:
|
||||
|
||||
SRCLIB=${LIBCOMPAT} ${LIBUTIL}
|
||||
DPADD=${LIBCOMPAT} ${LIBUTIL}
|
||||
|
||||
There is a predefined identifier for each (non-profiled,
|
||||
non-shared) library and object. Library file names are
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user