Update the mis-predicted branch PMC names (for sandy bridge) to not clash.
The SDM (June 2013) tables on these are rather confusing. Yes, they assign the same name (BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES) to two codes (C5H/00H and C5H/04H.) The latter however is the PEBS version. So, to make it easier to see the difference - and yes, we can use both without having to actually enable the PEBS specific bits! - just rename the PEBS one to _PS so there's no clashing. Tested: * Sandy bridge
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a94cdbea7
commit
81c4f79f18
@ -3282,7 +3282,7 @@ __PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_INST_RETIRED.FAR_BRANCH", IAP_EVENT_C4H_40H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES", IAP_EVENT_C5H_00H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.CONDITIONAL", IAP_EVENT_C5H_01H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.NEAR_CALL", IAP_EVENT_C5H_02H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES", IAP_EVENT_C5H_04H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES_PS", IAP_EVENT_C5H_04H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.NOT_TAKEN", IAP_EVENT_C5H_10H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.TAKEN", IAP_EVENT_C5H_20H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("FP_ASSIST.X87_OUTPUT", IAP_EVENT_CAH_02H) \
|
||||
@ -3514,7 +3514,7 @@ __PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_INST_RETIRED.FAR_BRANCH", IAP_EVENT_C4H_40H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES", IAP_EVENT_C5H_00H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.CONDITIONAL", IAP_EVENT_C5H_01H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.NEAR_CALL", IAP_EVENT_C5H_02H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES", IAP_EVENT_C5H_04H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES_PS", IAP_EVENT_C5H_04H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.NOT_TAKEN", IAP_EVENT_C5H_10H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("BR_MISP_RETIRED.TAKEN", IAP_EVENT_C5H_20H) \
|
||||
__PMC_EV_ALIAS("FP_ASSIST.X87_OUTPUT", IAP_EVENT_CAH_02H) \
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user