vfs: support negative entry promotion in lockless lookup
Tested by: pho
This commit is contained in:
parent
4057e3eaaa
commit
8230d29357
@ -807,6 +807,15 @@ cache_negative_remove(struct namecache *ncp)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
list_locked = true;
|
||||
mtx_lock(&neglist->nl_lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We may be racing against promotion in lockless lookup.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((negstate->neg_flag & NEG_HOT) != 0) {
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&neglist->nl_lock);
|
||||
hot_locked = true;
|
||||
mtx_lock(&ncneg_hot.nl_lock);
|
||||
mtx_lock(&neglist->nl_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((negstate->neg_flag & NEG_HOT) != 0) {
|
||||
mtx_assert(&ncneg_hot.nl_lock, MA_OWNED);
|
||||
@ -3060,6 +3069,103 @@ cache_fplookup_vnode_supported(struct vnode *vp)
|
||||
return (vp->v_type != VLNK);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Move a negative entry to the hot list.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We have to take locks, but they may be contended and in the worst
|
||||
* case we may need to go off CPU. We don't want to spin within the
|
||||
* smr section and we can't block with it. Instead we are going to
|
||||
* look up the entry again.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int __noinline
|
||||
cache_fplookup_negative_promote(struct cache_fpl *fpl, struct namecache *oncp,
|
||||
uint32_t hash)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct componentname *cnp;
|
||||
struct namecache *ncp;
|
||||
struct neglist *neglist;
|
||||
struct negstate *negstate;
|
||||
struct vnode *dvp;
|
||||
u_char nc_flag;
|
||||
|
||||
cnp = fpl->cnp;
|
||||
dvp = fpl->dvp;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!vhold_smr(dvp))
|
||||
return (cache_fpl_aborted(fpl));
|
||||
|
||||
neglist = NCP2NEGLIST(oncp);
|
||||
cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
|
||||
|
||||
mtx_lock(&ncneg_hot.nl_lock);
|
||||
mtx_lock(&neglist->nl_lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For hash iteration.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cache_fpl_smr_enter(fpl);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Avoid all surprises by only succeeding if we got the same entry and
|
||||
* bailing completely otherwise.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In particular at this point there can be a new ncp which matches the
|
||||
* search but hashes to a different neglist.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
CK_LIST_FOREACH(ncp, (NCHHASH(hash)), nc_hash) {
|
||||
if (ncp == oncp)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* No match to begin with.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (__predict_false(ncp == NULL)) {
|
||||
goto out_abort;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The newly found entry may be something different...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(ncp->nc_dvp == dvp && ncp->nc_nlen == cnp->cn_namelen &&
|
||||
!bcmp(ncp->nc_name, cnp->cn_nameptr, ncp->nc_nlen))) {
|
||||
goto out_abort;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* ... and not even negative.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
nc_flag = atomic_load_char(&ncp->nc_flag);
|
||||
if ((nc_flag & NCF_NEGATIVE) == 0) {
|
||||
goto out_abort;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (__predict_false(cache_ncp_invalid(ncp))) {
|
||||
goto out_abort;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
negstate = NCP2NEGSTATE(ncp);
|
||||
if ((negstate->neg_flag & NEG_HOT) == 0) {
|
||||
numhotneg++;
|
||||
TAILQ_REMOVE(&neglist->nl_list, ncp, nc_dst);
|
||||
TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ncneg_hot.nl_list, ncp, nc_dst);
|
||||
negstate->neg_flag |= NEG_HOT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp, ncp->nc_name);
|
||||
counter_u64_add(numneghits, 1);
|
||||
cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&neglist->nl_lock);
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&ncneg_hot.nl_lock);
|
||||
vdrop(dvp);
|
||||
return (cache_fpl_handled(fpl, ENOENT));
|
||||
out_abort:
|
||||
cache_fpl_smr_exit(fpl);
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&neglist->nl_lock);
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&ncneg_hot.nl_lock);
|
||||
vdrop(dvp);
|
||||
return (cache_fpl_aborted(fpl));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The target vnode is not supported, prepare for the slow path to take over.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -3204,12 +3310,7 @@ cache_fplookup_next(struct cache_fpl *fpl)
|
||||
return (cache_fpl_partial(fpl));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!neg_hot) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* TODO
|
||||
* Promoting to hot negative requires locks, thus is
|
||||
* left not yet supported for simplicity.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return (cache_fpl_partial(fpl));
|
||||
return (cache_fplookup_negative_promote(fpl, ncp, hash));
|
||||
}
|
||||
SDT_PROBE2(vfs, namecache, lookup, hit__negative, dvp,
|
||||
ncp->nc_name);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user