Fix the experimental NFS subsystem so that it uses the correct

preprocessor macro name for not requiring strict data alignment.

Suggested by:	marius
MFC after:	2 weeks
This commit is contained in:
rmacklem 2010-03-24 02:02:02 +00:00
parent 2cf63c604b
commit 823182179d

View File

@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ struct mtx nfs_slock_mutex;
/* local functions */ /* local functions */
static int nfssvc_call(struct thread *, struct nfssvc_args *, struct ucred *); static int nfssvc_call(struct thread *, struct nfssvc_args *, struct ucred *);
#if defined(__i386__) #ifdef __NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT
/* /*
* These architectures don't need re-alignment, so just return. * These architectures don't need re-alignment, so just return.
*/ */
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ newnfs_realign(struct mbuf **pm)
return; return;
} }
#else #else /* !__NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT */
/* /*
* newnfs_realign: * newnfs_realign:
* *
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ newnfs_realign(struct mbuf **pm)
pm = &m->m_next; pm = &m->m_next;
} }
} }
#endif /* !__i386__ */ #endif /* __NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT */
#ifdef notdef #ifdef notdef
static void static void